Does carotid stenting measure up to endarterectomy? A vascular surgeon's experience

Mark K. Eskandari, G. Matthew Longo, Joseph D. Vijungco, Mark D. Morasch, William H. Pearce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: Carotid angioplasty and stenting seems to have equal or better outcomes in high-risk patients than carotid endarterectomy. Design: Single-center case-control study. Setting: University hospital tertiary referral center. Patients: Individuals (n=53) undergoing elective carotid angioplasty and stenting for cervical carotid stenosis (n= 57) between April 2001 and October 2003. All patients were referred to and treated by the primary author (M.K.E.). Results: Mean±SD age was 68.8±1.2 years (64% men [34] and 36% women [19]), and overall mean±SD rate of stenosis was 79%±10%. Preprocedural neurologic symptoms were present in 42% of the group. Indications for treatment included prior neck surgery with irradiation (4), recurrent stenosis (19), and severe comorbidities (34). Duplex scanning 24 hours after stenting showed immediate mean percentage reductions in peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity of 74% and 76%, respectively. After a 30-day follow-up period, there were no deaths and no major or minor strokes. One patient (1.7%) developed transient amaurosis fugax 12 hours after the procedure. Four patients (7.0%) experienced access-related complications. Intraoperative complications included 1 seizure (1.7%) and 1 asystolic arrest (1.7%), both treated successfully. During follow-up, 3 cases of re-stenosis (5.0%) occurred. One asymptomatic occlusion (1.7%) was detected at the 6-month follow-up visit. There have been no late carotid-related complications or deaths. Conclusions: Vascular surgeons possessing advanced catheter-based skills can safely perform carotid angioplasty and stenting and can achieve perioperative results comparable with carotid endarterectomy. Determination of the true efficacy and durability of carotid angioplasty and stenting as compared with endarterectomy awaits ongoing randomized national trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)734-738
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume139
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2004

Fingerprint

Endarterectomy
Blood Vessels
Angioplasty
Pathologic Constriction
Carotid Endarterectomy
Amaurosis Fugax
Carotid Stenosis
Intraoperative Complications
Neurologic Manifestations
Tertiary Care Centers
Case-Control Studies
Comorbidity
Seizures
Neck
Referral and Consultation
Catheters
Stroke
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Does carotid stenting measure up to endarterectomy? A vascular surgeon's experience. / Eskandari, Mark K.; Longo, G. Matthew; Vijungco, Joseph D.; Morasch, Mark D.; Pearce, William H.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 139, No. 7, 01.07.2004, p. 734-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eskandari, Mark K. ; Longo, G. Matthew ; Vijungco, Joseph D. ; Morasch, Mark D. ; Pearce, William H. / Does carotid stenting measure up to endarterectomy? A vascular surgeon's experience. In: Archives of Surgery. 2004 ; Vol. 139, No. 7. pp. 734-738.
@article{bfb95496ec884933bd27894e79a41d19,
title = "Does carotid stenting measure up to endarterectomy? A vascular surgeon's experience",
abstract = "Hypothesis: Carotid angioplasty and stenting seems to have equal or better outcomes in high-risk patients than carotid endarterectomy. Design: Single-center case-control study. Setting: University hospital tertiary referral center. Patients: Individuals (n=53) undergoing elective carotid angioplasty and stenting for cervical carotid stenosis (n= 57) between April 2001 and October 2003. All patients were referred to and treated by the primary author (M.K.E.). Results: Mean±SD age was 68.8±1.2 years (64{\%} men [34] and 36{\%} women [19]), and overall mean±SD rate of stenosis was 79{\%}±10{\%}. Preprocedural neurologic symptoms were present in 42{\%} of the group. Indications for treatment included prior neck surgery with irradiation (4), recurrent stenosis (19), and severe comorbidities (34). Duplex scanning 24 hours after stenting showed immediate mean percentage reductions in peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity of 74{\%} and 76{\%}, respectively. After a 30-day follow-up period, there were no deaths and no major or minor strokes. One patient (1.7{\%}) developed transient amaurosis fugax 12 hours after the procedure. Four patients (7.0{\%}) experienced access-related complications. Intraoperative complications included 1 seizure (1.7{\%}) and 1 asystolic arrest (1.7{\%}), both treated successfully. During follow-up, 3 cases of re-stenosis (5.0{\%}) occurred. One asymptomatic occlusion (1.7{\%}) was detected at the 6-month follow-up visit. There have been no late carotid-related complications or deaths. Conclusions: Vascular surgeons possessing advanced catheter-based skills can safely perform carotid angioplasty and stenting and can achieve perioperative results comparable with carotid endarterectomy. Determination of the true efficacy and durability of carotid angioplasty and stenting as compared with endarterectomy awaits ongoing randomized national trials.",
author = "Eskandari, {Mark K.} and Longo, {G. Matthew} and Vijungco, {Joseph D.} and Morasch, {Mark D.} and Pearce, {William H.}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.139.7.734",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "734--738",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does carotid stenting measure up to endarterectomy? A vascular surgeon's experience

AU - Eskandari, Mark K.

AU - Longo, G. Matthew

AU - Vijungco, Joseph D.

AU - Morasch, Mark D.

AU - Pearce, William H.

PY - 2004/7/1

Y1 - 2004/7/1

N2 - Hypothesis: Carotid angioplasty and stenting seems to have equal or better outcomes in high-risk patients than carotid endarterectomy. Design: Single-center case-control study. Setting: University hospital tertiary referral center. Patients: Individuals (n=53) undergoing elective carotid angioplasty and stenting for cervical carotid stenosis (n= 57) between April 2001 and October 2003. All patients were referred to and treated by the primary author (M.K.E.). Results: Mean±SD age was 68.8±1.2 years (64% men [34] and 36% women [19]), and overall mean±SD rate of stenosis was 79%±10%. Preprocedural neurologic symptoms were present in 42% of the group. Indications for treatment included prior neck surgery with irradiation (4), recurrent stenosis (19), and severe comorbidities (34). Duplex scanning 24 hours after stenting showed immediate mean percentage reductions in peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity of 74% and 76%, respectively. After a 30-day follow-up period, there were no deaths and no major or minor strokes. One patient (1.7%) developed transient amaurosis fugax 12 hours after the procedure. Four patients (7.0%) experienced access-related complications. Intraoperative complications included 1 seizure (1.7%) and 1 asystolic arrest (1.7%), both treated successfully. During follow-up, 3 cases of re-stenosis (5.0%) occurred. One asymptomatic occlusion (1.7%) was detected at the 6-month follow-up visit. There have been no late carotid-related complications or deaths. Conclusions: Vascular surgeons possessing advanced catheter-based skills can safely perform carotid angioplasty and stenting and can achieve perioperative results comparable with carotid endarterectomy. Determination of the true efficacy and durability of carotid angioplasty and stenting as compared with endarterectomy awaits ongoing randomized national trials.

AB - Hypothesis: Carotid angioplasty and stenting seems to have equal or better outcomes in high-risk patients than carotid endarterectomy. Design: Single-center case-control study. Setting: University hospital tertiary referral center. Patients: Individuals (n=53) undergoing elective carotid angioplasty and stenting for cervical carotid stenosis (n= 57) between April 2001 and October 2003. All patients were referred to and treated by the primary author (M.K.E.). Results: Mean±SD age was 68.8±1.2 years (64% men [34] and 36% women [19]), and overall mean±SD rate of stenosis was 79%±10%. Preprocedural neurologic symptoms were present in 42% of the group. Indications for treatment included prior neck surgery with irradiation (4), recurrent stenosis (19), and severe comorbidities (34). Duplex scanning 24 hours after stenting showed immediate mean percentage reductions in peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity of 74% and 76%, respectively. After a 30-day follow-up period, there were no deaths and no major or minor strokes. One patient (1.7%) developed transient amaurosis fugax 12 hours after the procedure. Four patients (7.0%) experienced access-related complications. Intraoperative complications included 1 seizure (1.7%) and 1 asystolic arrest (1.7%), both treated successfully. During follow-up, 3 cases of re-stenosis (5.0%) occurred. One asymptomatic occlusion (1.7%) was detected at the 6-month follow-up visit. There have been no late carotid-related complications or deaths. Conclusions: Vascular surgeons possessing advanced catheter-based skills can safely perform carotid angioplasty and stenting and can achieve perioperative results comparable with carotid endarterectomy. Determination of the true efficacy and durability of carotid angioplasty and stenting as compared with endarterectomy awaits ongoing randomized national trials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042780431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042780431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.139.7.734

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.139.7.734

M3 - Article

C2 - 15249405

AN - SCOPUS:3042780431

VL - 139

SP - 734

EP - 738

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 7

ER -