Does Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Functional and Radiographic Outcomes Over Nonoperative Management 5 Years After Injury?

Elizabeth A Wellsandt, Matthew J. Failla, Michael J. Axe, Lynn Snyder-Mackler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Current practice patterns for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury favor surgical reconstruction. However, long-term outcomes may not differ between patients completing operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injury. Differences in outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment of patients in the United States is largely unknown, as are outcomes in long-term strength and performance measures. Purpose: To determine if differences exist in 5-year functional and radiographic outcomes between patients completing operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injury when both groups complete a progressive criterion-based rehabilitation protocol. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: From an original group of 144 athletes, 105 participants (mean ± SD age, 34.3 ± 11.4 years) with an acute ACL rupture completed functional testing (quadriceps strength, single-legged hop, and knee joint effusion testing; patient-reported outcomes) and knee radiographs 5 years after ACL reconstruction or completion of nonoperative rehabilitation. Results: At 5 years, patients treated with ACL reconstruction versus rehabilitation alone did not differ in quadriceps strength (P =.817); performance on single-legged hop tests (P =.234-.955); activity level (P =.349-.400); subjective reports of pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and knee-related quality of life (P =.090-.941); or presence of knee osteoarthritis (P =.102-.978). When compared with patients treated nonoperatively, patients treated operatively did report greater global ratings of knee function (P =.001), and lower fear (P =.035) at 5 years but were more likely to possess knee joint effusion (P =.016). Conclusion: The current findings indicate that favorable outcomes can occur after both operative and nonoperative management approaches with the use of progressive criterion-based rehabilitation. Further study is needed to determine clinical algorithms for identifying the best candidates for surgical versus nonoperative care after ACL injury. These findings provide an opportunity to improve the educational process between patients and clinicians regarding the expected clinical course and long-term outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injuries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2103-2112
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume46
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Wounds and Injuries
Rehabilitation
Humulus
Knee
Knee Joint
Knee Osteoarthritis
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Practice Management
Therapeutics
Activities of Daily Living
Athletes
Fear
Rupture
Cohort Studies
Quality of Life
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Pain

Keywords

  • anterior cruciate ligament injury
  • fear
  • knee function
  • osteoarthritis
  • rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Does Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Functional and Radiographic Outcomes Over Nonoperative Management 5 Years After Injury? / Wellsandt, Elizabeth A; Failla, Matthew J.; Axe, Michael J.; Snyder-Mackler, Lynn.

In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 9, 01.07.2018, p. 2103-2112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6d03737c96d74f1490d8151d350b511d,
title = "Does Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Functional and Radiographic Outcomes Over Nonoperative Management 5 Years After Injury?",
abstract = "Background: Current practice patterns for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury favor surgical reconstruction. However, long-term outcomes may not differ between patients completing operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injury. Differences in outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment of patients in the United States is largely unknown, as are outcomes in long-term strength and performance measures. Purpose: To determine if differences exist in 5-year functional and radiographic outcomes between patients completing operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injury when both groups complete a progressive criterion-based rehabilitation protocol. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: From an original group of 144 athletes, 105 participants (mean ± SD age, 34.3 ± 11.4 years) with an acute ACL rupture completed functional testing (quadriceps strength, single-legged hop, and knee joint effusion testing; patient-reported outcomes) and knee radiographs 5 years after ACL reconstruction or completion of nonoperative rehabilitation. Results: At 5 years, patients treated with ACL reconstruction versus rehabilitation alone did not differ in quadriceps strength (P =.817); performance on single-legged hop tests (P =.234-.955); activity level (P =.349-.400); subjective reports of pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and knee-related quality of life (P =.090-.941); or presence of knee osteoarthritis (P =.102-.978). When compared with patients treated nonoperatively, patients treated operatively did report greater global ratings of knee function (P =.001), and lower fear (P =.035) at 5 years but were more likely to possess knee joint effusion (P =.016). Conclusion: The current findings indicate that favorable outcomes can occur after both operative and nonoperative management approaches with the use of progressive criterion-based rehabilitation. Further study is needed to determine clinical algorithms for identifying the best candidates for surgical versus nonoperative care after ACL injury. These findings provide an opportunity to improve the educational process between patients and clinicians regarding the expected clinical course and long-term outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injuries.",
keywords = "anterior cruciate ligament injury, fear, knee function, osteoarthritis, rehabilitation",
author = "Wellsandt, {Elizabeth A} and Failla, {Matthew J.} and Axe, {Michael J.} and Lynn Snyder-Mackler",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0363546518782698",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "2103--2112",
journal = "American Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Functional and Radiographic Outcomes Over Nonoperative Management 5 Years After Injury?

AU - Wellsandt, Elizabeth A

AU - Failla, Matthew J.

AU - Axe, Michael J.

AU - Snyder-Mackler, Lynn

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Background: Current practice patterns for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury favor surgical reconstruction. However, long-term outcomes may not differ between patients completing operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injury. Differences in outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment of patients in the United States is largely unknown, as are outcomes in long-term strength and performance measures. Purpose: To determine if differences exist in 5-year functional and radiographic outcomes between patients completing operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injury when both groups complete a progressive criterion-based rehabilitation protocol. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: From an original group of 144 athletes, 105 participants (mean ± SD age, 34.3 ± 11.4 years) with an acute ACL rupture completed functional testing (quadriceps strength, single-legged hop, and knee joint effusion testing; patient-reported outcomes) and knee radiographs 5 years after ACL reconstruction or completion of nonoperative rehabilitation. Results: At 5 years, patients treated with ACL reconstruction versus rehabilitation alone did not differ in quadriceps strength (P =.817); performance on single-legged hop tests (P =.234-.955); activity level (P =.349-.400); subjective reports of pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and knee-related quality of life (P =.090-.941); or presence of knee osteoarthritis (P =.102-.978). When compared with patients treated nonoperatively, patients treated operatively did report greater global ratings of knee function (P =.001), and lower fear (P =.035) at 5 years but were more likely to possess knee joint effusion (P =.016). Conclusion: The current findings indicate that favorable outcomes can occur after both operative and nonoperative management approaches with the use of progressive criterion-based rehabilitation. Further study is needed to determine clinical algorithms for identifying the best candidates for surgical versus nonoperative care after ACL injury. These findings provide an opportunity to improve the educational process between patients and clinicians regarding the expected clinical course and long-term outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injuries.

AB - Background: Current practice patterns for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury favor surgical reconstruction. However, long-term outcomes may not differ between patients completing operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injury. Differences in outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment of patients in the United States is largely unknown, as are outcomes in long-term strength and performance measures. Purpose: To determine if differences exist in 5-year functional and radiographic outcomes between patients completing operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injury when both groups complete a progressive criterion-based rehabilitation protocol. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: From an original group of 144 athletes, 105 participants (mean ± SD age, 34.3 ± 11.4 years) with an acute ACL rupture completed functional testing (quadriceps strength, single-legged hop, and knee joint effusion testing; patient-reported outcomes) and knee radiographs 5 years after ACL reconstruction or completion of nonoperative rehabilitation. Results: At 5 years, patients treated with ACL reconstruction versus rehabilitation alone did not differ in quadriceps strength (P =.817); performance on single-legged hop tests (P =.234-.955); activity level (P =.349-.400); subjective reports of pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and knee-related quality of life (P =.090-.941); or presence of knee osteoarthritis (P =.102-.978). When compared with patients treated nonoperatively, patients treated operatively did report greater global ratings of knee function (P =.001), and lower fear (P =.035) at 5 years but were more likely to possess knee joint effusion (P =.016). Conclusion: The current findings indicate that favorable outcomes can occur after both operative and nonoperative management approaches with the use of progressive criterion-based rehabilitation. Further study is needed to determine clinical algorithms for identifying the best candidates for surgical versus nonoperative care after ACL injury. These findings provide an opportunity to improve the educational process between patients and clinicians regarding the expected clinical course and long-term outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of ACL injuries.

KW - anterior cruciate ligament injury

KW - fear

KW - knee function

KW - osteoarthritis

KW - rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049011430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049011430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0363546518782698

DO - 10.1177/0363546518782698

M3 - Article

C2 - 29927640

AN - SCOPUS:85049011430

VL - 46

SP - 2103

EP - 2112

JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 9

ER -