Do the features, amenities, and quality of physical activity resources differ between city and county areas of a large rural region?

Jennie L Hill, Clarice N. Waters, Korine N. Kolivras, Paul A Estabrooks, Jamie M. Zoellner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The goal of this work was to provide a community-academic partnership with actionable information for physical activity (PA) for a rural health-disparate region. Identified PA outlets were audited and combined with survey data for 813 residents in the region. Less than a third of sampled residents (28%) met PA recommendations, with low perceptions of safety for PA. PA resource outlets in rural areas had higher numbers of incivilities. On the basis of our findings, 4 actionable strategies are recommended: shared-use agreements, reducing incivilities, addressing issues related to safety from traffic, and increasing the number of PA resources in rural areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-282
Number of pages10
JournalFamily and Community Health
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 23 2016

Fingerprint

Safety
Rural Health
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Built environment
  • Community-based participatory research
  • Physical activity
  • Rural

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Do the features, amenities, and quality of physical activity resources differ between city and county areas of a large rural region? / Hill, Jennie L; Waters, Clarice N.; Kolivras, Korine N.; Estabrooks, Paul A; Zoellner, Jamie M.

In: Family and Community Health, Vol. 39, No. 4, 23.08.2016, p. 273-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b0568176d6df4d9bbb8cbd8ebf735b94,
title = "Do the features, amenities, and quality of physical activity resources differ between city and county areas of a large rural region?",
abstract = "The goal of this work was to provide a community-academic partnership with actionable information for physical activity (PA) for a rural health-disparate region. Identified PA outlets were audited and combined with survey data for 813 residents in the region. Less than a third of sampled residents (28{\%}) met PA recommendations, with low perceptions of safety for PA. PA resource outlets in rural areas had higher numbers of incivilities. On the basis of our findings, 4 actionable strategies are recommended: shared-use agreements, reducing incivilities, addressing issues related to safety from traffic, and increasing the number of PA resources in rural areas.",
keywords = "Built environment, Community-based participatory research, Physical activity, Rural",
author = "Hill, {Jennie L} and Waters, {Clarice N.} and Kolivras, {Korine N.} and Estabrooks, {Paul A} and Zoellner, {Jamie M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1097/FCH.0000000000000119",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "273--282",
journal = "Family and Community Health",
issn = "0160-6379",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do the features, amenities, and quality of physical activity resources differ between city and county areas of a large rural region?

AU - Hill, Jennie L

AU - Waters, Clarice N.

AU - Kolivras, Korine N.

AU - Estabrooks, Paul A

AU - Zoellner, Jamie M.

PY - 2016/8/23

Y1 - 2016/8/23

N2 - The goal of this work was to provide a community-academic partnership with actionable information for physical activity (PA) for a rural health-disparate region. Identified PA outlets were audited and combined with survey data for 813 residents in the region. Less than a third of sampled residents (28%) met PA recommendations, with low perceptions of safety for PA. PA resource outlets in rural areas had higher numbers of incivilities. On the basis of our findings, 4 actionable strategies are recommended: shared-use agreements, reducing incivilities, addressing issues related to safety from traffic, and increasing the number of PA resources in rural areas.

AB - The goal of this work was to provide a community-academic partnership with actionable information for physical activity (PA) for a rural health-disparate region. Identified PA outlets were audited and combined with survey data for 813 residents in the region. Less than a third of sampled residents (28%) met PA recommendations, with low perceptions of safety for PA. PA resource outlets in rural areas had higher numbers of incivilities. On the basis of our findings, 4 actionable strategies are recommended: shared-use agreements, reducing incivilities, addressing issues related to safety from traffic, and increasing the number of PA resources in rural areas.

KW - Built environment

KW - Community-based participatory research

KW - Physical activity

KW - Rural

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983738571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983738571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000119

DO - 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000119

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 273

EP - 282

JO - Family and Community Health

JF - Family and Community Health

SN - 0160-6379

IS - 4

ER -