Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? An empirical analysis

Albert V. Carron, Lawrence R. Brawley, Mark A. Eys, Steven Bray, Kim Dorsch, Paul Estabrooks, Craig R. Hall, James Hardy, Heather Hausenblas, Ralph Madison, David Paskevich, Michelle M. Patterson, Harry Prapavessis, Kevin S. Spink, Peter C. Terry

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study's primary purpose was to examine the degree to which individual perceptions of cohesiveness reflect shared beliefs in sport teams. The secondary purposes were to examine how the type of cohesion, the task interactive nature of the group, and the absolute level of cohesion relate to the index of agreement. Teams (n = 192 containing 2, 107 athletes) were tested on the Group Environment Questionnaire. Index of agreement values were greater for the group integration (GI) manifestations of cohesiveness (GI-task, rwg(j)) = .721; GI-social, rwg(j) = .694) than for the individual attractions to the group (ATG) manifestations (ATG-task, rwg(j) = .621; ATG-social, rwg(j) = .563). No differences were found for interactive versus coactive/independent sport teams. A positive relationship was observed between the absolute level of cohesiveness and the index of agreement. Results were discussed in terms of their implication for the aggregation of individual perceptions of cohesion to represent the group construct.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)468-496
Number of pages29
JournalSmall Group Research
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2003

Fingerprint

Sports
Athletes
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Consensus
  • Group Environment Questionnaire
  • Sport teams
  • Task type

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., Eys, M. A., Bray, S., Dorsch, K., Estabrooks, P., ... Terry, P. C. (2003). Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? An empirical analysis. Small Group Research, 34(4), 468-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496403254274

Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? An empirical analysis. / Carron, Albert V.; Brawley, Lawrence R.; Eys, Mark A.; Bray, Steven; Dorsch, Kim; Estabrooks, Paul; Hall, Craig R.; Hardy, James; Hausenblas, Heather; Madison, Ralph; Paskevich, David; Patterson, Michelle M.; Prapavessis, Harry; Spink, Kevin S.; Terry, Peter C.

In: Small Group Research, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.08.2003, p. 468-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Carron, AV, Brawley, LR, Eys, MA, Bray, S, Dorsch, K, Estabrooks, P, Hall, CR, Hardy, J, Hausenblas, H, Madison, R, Paskevich, D, Patterson, MM, Prapavessis, H, Spink, KS & Terry, PC 2003, 'Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? An empirical analysis', Small Group Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 468-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496403254274
Carron, Albert V. ; Brawley, Lawrence R. ; Eys, Mark A. ; Bray, Steven ; Dorsch, Kim ; Estabrooks, Paul ; Hall, Craig R. ; Hardy, James ; Hausenblas, Heather ; Madison, Ralph ; Paskevich, David ; Patterson, Michelle M. ; Prapavessis, Harry ; Spink, Kevin S. ; Terry, Peter C. / Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? An empirical analysis. In: Small Group Research. 2003 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 468-496.
@article{1198857a64a04c30b68c6b6cb8897742,
title = "Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs?: An empirical analysis",
abstract = "This study's primary purpose was to examine the degree to which individual perceptions of cohesiveness reflect shared beliefs in sport teams. The secondary purposes were to examine how the type of cohesion, the task interactive nature of the group, and the absolute level of cohesion relate to the index of agreement. Teams (n = 192 containing 2, 107 athletes) were tested on the Group Environment Questionnaire. Index of agreement values were greater for the group integration (GI) manifestations of cohesiveness (GI-task, rwg(j)) = .721; GI-social, rwg(j) = .694) than for the individual attractions to the group (ATG) manifestations (ATG-task, rwg(j) = .621; ATG-social, rwg(j) = .563). No differences were found for interactive versus coactive/independent sport teams. A positive relationship was observed between the absolute level of cohesiveness and the index of agreement. Results were discussed in terms of their implication for the aggregation of individual perceptions of cohesion to represent the group construct.",
keywords = "Consensus, Group Environment Questionnaire, Sport teams, Task type",
author = "Carron, {Albert V.} and Brawley, {Lawrence R.} and Eys, {Mark A.} and Steven Bray and Kim Dorsch and Paul Estabrooks and Hall, {Craig R.} and James Hardy and Heather Hausenblas and Ralph Madison and David Paskevich and Patterson, {Michelle M.} and Harry Prapavessis and Spink, {Kevin S.} and Terry, {Peter C.}",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1046496403254274",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "468--496",
journal = "Small Group Research",
issn = "1046-4964",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs?

T2 - An empirical analysis

AU - Carron, Albert V.

AU - Brawley, Lawrence R.

AU - Eys, Mark A.

AU - Bray, Steven

AU - Dorsch, Kim

AU - Estabrooks, Paul

AU - Hall, Craig R.

AU - Hardy, James

AU - Hausenblas, Heather

AU - Madison, Ralph

AU - Paskevich, David

AU - Patterson, Michelle M.

AU - Prapavessis, Harry

AU - Spink, Kevin S.

AU - Terry, Peter C.

PY - 2003/8/1

Y1 - 2003/8/1

N2 - This study's primary purpose was to examine the degree to which individual perceptions of cohesiveness reflect shared beliefs in sport teams. The secondary purposes were to examine how the type of cohesion, the task interactive nature of the group, and the absolute level of cohesion relate to the index of agreement. Teams (n = 192 containing 2, 107 athletes) were tested on the Group Environment Questionnaire. Index of agreement values were greater for the group integration (GI) manifestations of cohesiveness (GI-task, rwg(j)) = .721; GI-social, rwg(j) = .694) than for the individual attractions to the group (ATG) manifestations (ATG-task, rwg(j) = .621; ATG-social, rwg(j) = .563). No differences were found for interactive versus coactive/independent sport teams. A positive relationship was observed between the absolute level of cohesiveness and the index of agreement. Results were discussed in terms of their implication for the aggregation of individual perceptions of cohesion to represent the group construct.

AB - This study's primary purpose was to examine the degree to which individual perceptions of cohesiveness reflect shared beliefs in sport teams. The secondary purposes were to examine how the type of cohesion, the task interactive nature of the group, and the absolute level of cohesion relate to the index of agreement. Teams (n = 192 containing 2, 107 athletes) were tested on the Group Environment Questionnaire. Index of agreement values were greater for the group integration (GI) manifestations of cohesiveness (GI-task, rwg(j)) = .721; GI-social, rwg(j) = .694) than for the individual attractions to the group (ATG) manifestations (ATG-task, rwg(j) = .621; ATG-social, rwg(j) = .563). No differences were found for interactive versus coactive/independent sport teams. A positive relationship was observed between the absolute level of cohesiveness and the index of agreement. Results were discussed in terms of their implication for the aggregation of individual perceptions of cohesion to represent the group construct.

KW - Consensus

KW - Group Environment Questionnaire

KW - Sport teams

KW - Task type

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042206521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042206521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1046496403254274

DO - 10.1177/1046496403254274

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0042206521

VL - 34

SP - 468

EP - 496

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

SN - 1046-4964

IS - 4

ER -