Do Clerkship Directors Think Medical Students Are Prepared for the Clerkship Years?

Donna M. Windish, Paul Mark Paulman, Allan H. Goroll, Eric B. Bass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. Educators have begun to question whethei medical students are adequately prepared for the core clerkships. Inadequate preclerkship preparation may hinder learning and may be predictive of future achievement. This study assessed and compared the views of clerkship directors regarding student preparation for the core clinical clerkships in six key competencies. Method. In 2002, a national survey was conducted of 190 clerkship directors in internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, and psychiatry from 32 U.S. medical schools. Clerkship directors were asked to report their views on the appropriate level of student preparation needed to begin the core clinical clerkships (none, minimal, intermediate, advanced), and the adequacy of that preparation (ranging from "much less" to "much more than necessary") in six key clinical competencies. Results. A total of 140 clerkship directors responded (74%). The majority reported that students need at least intermediate ability in five of six competencies: communication (96%), professionalism (96%), interviewing/physical examination (78%), life-cycle stages (57%), epidemiology/probabilistic thinking (56%), and systems of care (27%). Thirty to fifty percent of clerkship directors felt students are less prepared than necessary in the six competencies. Views were similar across all specialties and generally did not differ by other clerkship director characteristics. Conclusions. Almost half of clerkship directors were concerned that students do not receive adequate preparation in key competencies before starting the core clinical clerkships. Many medical schools may need to give more attention to the preclerkship preparation of students in these high-priority areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-61
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Medical Students
medical student
director
Clinical Clerkship
Students
Medical Schools
student
Obstetric Surgical Procedures
medicine
Aptitude
Clinical Competence
gynecology
Internal Medicine
Systems Analysis
Life Cycle Stages
Gynecology
obstetrics
Physical Examination
Psychiatry
epidemiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Do Clerkship Directors Think Medical Students Are Prepared for the Clerkship Years? / Windish, Donna M.; Paulman, Paul Mark; Goroll, Allan H.; Bass, Eric B.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 79, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 56-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Windish, Donna M. ; Paulman, Paul Mark ; Goroll, Allan H. ; Bass, Eric B. / Do Clerkship Directors Think Medical Students Are Prepared for the Clerkship Years?. In: Academic Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 79, No. 1. pp. 56-61.
@article{bdd56b5187c74bf8a820075b9679fb0a,
title = "Do Clerkship Directors Think Medical Students Are Prepared for the Clerkship Years?",
abstract = "Purpose. Educators have begun to question whethei medical students are adequately prepared for the core clerkships. Inadequate preclerkship preparation may hinder learning and may be predictive of future achievement. This study assessed and compared the views of clerkship directors regarding student preparation for the core clinical clerkships in six key competencies. Method. In 2002, a national survey was conducted of 190 clerkship directors in internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, and psychiatry from 32 U.S. medical schools. Clerkship directors were asked to report their views on the appropriate level of student preparation needed to begin the core clinical clerkships (none, minimal, intermediate, advanced), and the adequacy of that preparation (ranging from {"}much less{"} to {"}much more than necessary{"}) in six key clinical competencies. Results. A total of 140 clerkship directors responded (74{\%}). The majority reported that students need at least intermediate ability in five of six competencies: communication (96{\%}), professionalism (96{\%}), interviewing/physical examination (78{\%}), life-cycle stages (57{\%}), epidemiology/probabilistic thinking (56{\%}), and systems of care (27{\%}). Thirty to fifty percent of clerkship directors felt students are less prepared than necessary in the six competencies. Views were similar across all specialties and generally did not differ by other clerkship director characteristics. Conclusions. Almost half of clerkship directors were concerned that students do not receive adequate preparation in key competencies before starting the core clinical clerkships. Many medical schools may need to give more attention to the preclerkship preparation of students in these high-priority areas.",
author = "Windish, {Donna M.} and Paulman, {Paul Mark} and Goroll, {Allan H.} and Bass, {Eric B.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00001888-200401000-00013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "56--61",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Clerkship Directors Think Medical Students Are Prepared for the Clerkship Years?

AU - Windish, Donna M.

AU - Paulman, Paul Mark

AU - Goroll, Allan H.

AU - Bass, Eric B.

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Purpose. Educators have begun to question whethei medical students are adequately prepared for the core clerkships. Inadequate preclerkship preparation may hinder learning and may be predictive of future achievement. This study assessed and compared the views of clerkship directors regarding student preparation for the core clinical clerkships in six key competencies. Method. In 2002, a national survey was conducted of 190 clerkship directors in internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, and psychiatry from 32 U.S. medical schools. Clerkship directors were asked to report their views on the appropriate level of student preparation needed to begin the core clinical clerkships (none, minimal, intermediate, advanced), and the adequacy of that preparation (ranging from "much less" to "much more than necessary") in six key clinical competencies. Results. A total of 140 clerkship directors responded (74%). The majority reported that students need at least intermediate ability in five of six competencies: communication (96%), professionalism (96%), interviewing/physical examination (78%), life-cycle stages (57%), epidemiology/probabilistic thinking (56%), and systems of care (27%). Thirty to fifty percent of clerkship directors felt students are less prepared than necessary in the six competencies. Views were similar across all specialties and generally did not differ by other clerkship director characteristics. Conclusions. Almost half of clerkship directors were concerned that students do not receive adequate preparation in key competencies before starting the core clinical clerkships. Many medical schools may need to give more attention to the preclerkship preparation of students in these high-priority areas.

AB - Purpose. Educators have begun to question whethei medical students are adequately prepared for the core clerkships. Inadequate preclerkship preparation may hinder learning and may be predictive of future achievement. This study assessed and compared the views of clerkship directors regarding student preparation for the core clinical clerkships in six key competencies. Method. In 2002, a national survey was conducted of 190 clerkship directors in internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, and psychiatry from 32 U.S. medical schools. Clerkship directors were asked to report their views on the appropriate level of student preparation needed to begin the core clinical clerkships (none, minimal, intermediate, advanced), and the adequacy of that preparation (ranging from "much less" to "much more than necessary") in six key clinical competencies. Results. A total of 140 clerkship directors responded (74%). The majority reported that students need at least intermediate ability in five of six competencies: communication (96%), professionalism (96%), interviewing/physical examination (78%), life-cycle stages (57%), epidemiology/probabilistic thinking (56%), and systems of care (27%). Thirty to fifty percent of clerkship directors felt students are less prepared than necessary in the six competencies. Views were similar across all specialties and generally did not differ by other clerkship director characteristics. Conclusions. Almost half of clerkship directors were concerned that students do not receive adequate preparation in key competencies before starting the core clinical clerkships. Many medical schools may need to give more attention to the preclerkship preparation of students in these high-priority areas.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346963300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346963300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001888-200401000-00013

DO - 10.1097/00001888-200401000-00013

M3 - Article

C2 - 14690998

AN - SCOPUS:0346963300

VL - 79

SP - 56

EP - 61

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 1

ER -