Divergent Selection for Heat Loss in Mice: II. Correlated Responses in Feed Intake, Body Mass, Body Composition, and Number Born Through Fifteen Generations

M. K. Nielsen, B. A. Freking, L. D. Jones, S. M. Nelson, T. L. Vorderstrasse, B. A. Hussey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Divergent selection for heat loss (kcal·kg-.75·d-1), measured in 9- to 11-wk-old male mice, was conducted for 15 generations. Selection for high (MH) and low (ML) heat loss and unselected control (MC) occurred in each of three replicates for a total of nine unique lines. Feed intake in males was measured during Generations 9 through 15. Body mass at commencement of mating in females and at time of measurement of heat loss in males was recorded. Body fat percentage at 12 wk for animals of Generations 6, 10, and 14 was predicted as a function of electrical conductivity and body mass. Litter size was recorded for all generations, and components of litter size were evaluated at Generation 11 in one replicate and Generation 12 in the other two replicates. Feed intake changed in the same direction as heat loss for the MH and ML selections; at Generation 15, the difference between MH and ML (P < .002) was 20.6% of the MC mean. Body mass did not change with selection for heat loss. Differences in body fat percentage were not significant in earlier generations, but at Generation 14, MH and ML were significantly (P < .01) different with MH mice having the lowest fat percentage; MC was intermediate. Selection had a significant (MH vs ML; P < .01) effect on litter size, causing an increase in MH and a decrease in ML. This difference was explained by a difference (P < .01) in ovulation rate. There was no asymmetry of response in feed intake, fatness, litter size, or number of ovulations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1469-1476
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of animal science
Volume75
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1997

Fingerprint

correlated responses
Body Composition
Litter Size
body composition
feed intake
litter size
Hot Temperature
heat
mice
Ovulation
body fat
ovulation
Adipose Tissue
Electric Conductivity
electrical conductivity
Fats
lipids
animals

Keywords

  • Body Composition
  • Feed Intake
  • Heat Loss
  • Litter Size
  • Mice
  • Selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Genetics

Cite this

Divergent Selection for Heat Loss in Mice : II. Correlated Responses in Feed Intake, Body Mass, Body Composition, and Number Born Through Fifteen Generations. / Nielsen, M. K.; Freking, B. A.; Jones, L. D.; Nelson, S. M.; Vorderstrasse, T. L.; Hussey, B. A.

In: Journal of animal science, Vol. 75, No. 6, 06.1997, p. 1469-1476.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nielsen, M. K. ; Freking, B. A. ; Jones, L. D. ; Nelson, S. M. ; Vorderstrasse, T. L. ; Hussey, B. A. / Divergent Selection for Heat Loss in Mice : II. Correlated Responses in Feed Intake, Body Mass, Body Composition, and Number Born Through Fifteen Generations. In: Journal of animal science. 1997 ; Vol. 75, No. 6. pp. 1469-1476.
@article{731ba3079dda405a846ab0cb96a8dcd7,
title = "Divergent Selection for Heat Loss in Mice: II. Correlated Responses in Feed Intake, Body Mass, Body Composition, and Number Born Through Fifteen Generations",
abstract = "Divergent selection for heat loss (kcal·kg-.75·d-1), measured in 9- to 11-wk-old male mice, was conducted for 15 generations. Selection for high (MH) and low (ML) heat loss and unselected control (MC) occurred in each of three replicates for a total of nine unique lines. Feed intake in males was measured during Generations 9 through 15. Body mass at commencement of mating in females and at time of measurement of heat loss in males was recorded. Body fat percentage at 12 wk for animals of Generations 6, 10, and 14 was predicted as a function of electrical conductivity and body mass. Litter size was recorded for all generations, and components of litter size were evaluated at Generation 11 in one replicate and Generation 12 in the other two replicates. Feed intake changed in the same direction as heat loss for the MH and ML selections; at Generation 15, the difference between MH and ML (P < .002) was 20.6{\%} of the MC mean. Body mass did not change with selection for heat loss. Differences in body fat percentage were not significant in earlier generations, but at Generation 14, MH and ML were significantly (P < .01) different with MH mice having the lowest fat percentage; MC was intermediate. Selection had a significant (MH vs ML; P < .01) effect on litter size, causing an increase in MH and a decrease in ML. This difference was explained by a difference (P < .01) in ovulation rate. There was no asymmetry of response in feed intake, fatness, litter size, or number of ovulations.",
keywords = "Body Composition, Feed Intake, Heat Loss, Litter Size, Mice, Selection",
author = "Nielsen, {M. K.} and Freking, {B. A.} and Jones, {L. D.} and Nelson, {S. M.} and Vorderstrasse, {T. L.} and Hussey, {B. A.}",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
doi = "10.2527/1997.7561469x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "1469--1476",
journal = "Journal of Animal Science",
issn = "0021-8812",
publisher = "American Society of Animal Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Divergent Selection for Heat Loss in Mice

T2 - II. Correlated Responses in Feed Intake, Body Mass, Body Composition, and Number Born Through Fifteen Generations

AU - Nielsen, M. K.

AU - Freking, B. A.

AU - Jones, L. D.

AU - Nelson, S. M.

AU - Vorderstrasse, T. L.

AU - Hussey, B. A.

PY - 1997/6

Y1 - 1997/6

N2 - Divergent selection for heat loss (kcal·kg-.75·d-1), measured in 9- to 11-wk-old male mice, was conducted for 15 generations. Selection for high (MH) and low (ML) heat loss and unselected control (MC) occurred in each of three replicates for a total of nine unique lines. Feed intake in males was measured during Generations 9 through 15. Body mass at commencement of mating in females and at time of measurement of heat loss in males was recorded. Body fat percentage at 12 wk for animals of Generations 6, 10, and 14 was predicted as a function of electrical conductivity and body mass. Litter size was recorded for all generations, and components of litter size were evaluated at Generation 11 in one replicate and Generation 12 in the other two replicates. Feed intake changed in the same direction as heat loss for the MH and ML selections; at Generation 15, the difference between MH and ML (P < .002) was 20.6% of the MC mean. Body mass did not change with selection for heat loss. Differences in body fat percentage were not significant in earlier generations, but at Generation 14, MH and ML were significantly (P < .01) different with MH mice having the lowest fat percentage; MC was intermediate. Selection had a significant (MH vs ML; P < .01) effect on litter size, causing an increase in MH and a decrease in ML. This difference was explained by a difference (P < .01) in ovulation rate. There was no asymmetry of response in feed intake, fatness, litter size, or number of ovulations.

AB - Divergent selection for heat loss (kcal·kg-.75·d-1), measured in 9- to 11-wk-old male mice, was conducted for 15 generations. Selection for high (MH) and low (ML) heat loss and unselected control (MC) occurred in each of three replicates for a total of nine unique lines. Feed intake in males was measured during Generations 9 through 15. Body mass at commencement of mating in females and at time of measurement of heat loss in males was recorded. Body fat percentage at 12 wk for animals of Generations 6, 10, and 14 was predicted as a function of electrical conductivity and body mass. Litter size was recorded for all generations, and components of litter size were evaluated at Generation 11 in one replicate and Generation 12 in the other two replicates. Feed intake changed in the same direction as heat loss for the MH and ML selections; at Generation 15, the difference between MH and ML (P < .002) was 20.6% of the MC mean. Body mass did not change with selection for heat loss. Differences in body fat percentage were not significant in earlier generations, but at Generation 14, MH and ML were significantly (P < .01) different with MH mice having the lowest fat percentage; MC was intermediate. Selection had a significant (MH vs ML; P < .01) effect on litter size, causing an increase in MH and a decrease in ML. This difference was explained by a difference (P < .01) in ovulation rate. There was no asymmetry of response in feed intake, fatness, litter size, or number of ovulations.

KW - Body Composition

KW - Feed Intake

KW - Heat Loss

KW - Litter Size

KW - Mice

KW - Selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031154228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031154228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2527/1997.7561469x

DO - 10.2527/1997.7561469x

M3 - Article

C2 - 9250506

AN - SCOPUS:0031154228

VL - 75

SP - 1469

EP - 1476

JO - Journal of Animal Science

JF - Journal of Animal Science

SN - 0021-8812

IS - 6

ER -