Distributed Cognition in Cancer Treatment Decision Making: An Application of the DECIDE Decision-Making Styles Typology

Janice L. Krieger, Jessica L. Krok-Schoen, Phokeng M. Dailey, Angela Palmer-Wackerly, Nancy Schoenberg, Electra D. Paskett, Mark Dignan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Distributed cognition occurs when cognitive and affective schemas are shared between two or more people during interpersonal discussion. Although extant research focuses on distributed cognition in decision making between health care providers and patients, studies show that caregivers are also highly influential in the treatment decisions of patients. However, there are little empirical data describing how and when families exert influence. The current article addresses this gap by examining decisional support in the context of cancer randomized clinical trial (RCT) decision making. Data are drawn from in-depth interviews with rural, Appalachian cancer patients (N = 46). Analysis of transcript data yielded empirical support for four distinct models of health decision making. The implications of these findings for developing interventions to improve the quality of treatment decision making and overall well-being are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1146-1159
Number of pages14
JournalQualitative Health Research
Volume27
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Cognition
Decision Making
Neoplasms
Health Personnel
Caregivers
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Interviews
Health
Research
Clinical Decision-Making

Keywords

  • In-depth qualitative interviews
  • USA
  • cancer
  • communication
  • health disparities
  • region: Appalachia
  • treatment decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Distributed Cognition in Cancer Treatment Decision Making : An Application of the DECIDE Decision-Making Styles Typology. / Krieger, Janice L.; Krok-Schoen, Jessica L.; Dailey, Phokeng M.; Palmer-Wackerly, Angela; Schoenberg, Nancy; Paskett, Electra D.; Dignan, Mark.

In: Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 27, No. 8, 01.07.2017, p. 1146-1159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krieger, Janice L. ; Krok-Schoen, Jessica L. ; Dailey, Phokeng M. ; Palmer-Wackerly, Angela ; Schoenberg, Nancy ; Paskett, Electra D. ; Dignan, Mark. / Distributed Cognition in Cancer Treatment Decision Making : An Application of the DECIDE Decision-Making Styles Typology. In: Qualitative Health Research. 2017 ; Vol. 27, No. 8. pp. 1146-1159.
@article{ec515f02b031497aaa087f74512f0b20,
title = "Distributed Cognition in Cancer Treatment Decision Making: An Application of the DECIDE Decision-Making Styles Typology",
abstract = "Distributed cognition occurs when cognitive and affective schemas are shared between two or more people during interpersonal discussion. Although extant research focuses on distributed cognition in decision making between health care providers and patients, studies show that caregivers are also highly influential in the treatment decisions of patients. However, there are little empirical data describing how and when families exert influence. The current article addresses this gap by examining decisional support in the context of cancer randomized clinical trial (RCT) decision making. Data are drawn from in-depth interviews with rural, Appalachian cancer patients (N = 46). Analysis of transcript data yielded empirical support for four distinct models of health decision making. The implications of these findings for developing interventions to improve the quality of treatment decision making and overall well-being are discussed.",
keywords = "In-depth qualitative interviews, USA, cancer, communication, health disparities, region: Appalachia, treatment decision making",
author = "Krieger, {Janice L.} and Krok-Schoen, {Jessica L.} and Dailey, {Phokeng M.} and Angela Palmer-Wackerly and Nancy Schoenberg and Paskett, {Electra D.} and Mark Dignan",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1049732316645321",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1146--1159",
journal = "Qualitative Health Research",
issn = "1049-7323",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distributed Cognition in Cancer Treatment Decision Making

T2 - An Application of the DECIDE Decision-Making Styles Typology

AU - Krieger, Janice L.

AU - Krok-Schoen, Jessica L.

AU - Dailey, Phokeng M.

AU - Palmer-Wackerly, Angela

AU - Schoenberg, Nancy

AU - Paskett, Electra D.

AU - Dignan, Mark

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Distributed cognition occurs when cognitive and affective schemas are shared between two or more people during interpersonal discussion. Although extant research focuses on distributed cognition in decision making between health care providers and patients, studies show that caregivers are also highly influential in the treatment decisions of patients. However, there are little empirical data describing how and when families exert influence. The current article addresses this gap by examining decisional support in the context of cancer randomized clinical trial (RCT) decision making. Data are drawn from in-depth interviews with rural, Appalachian cancer patients (N = 46). Analysis of transcript data yielded empirical support for four distinct models of health decision making. The implications of these findings for developing interventions to improve the quality of treatment decision making and overall well-being are discussed.

AB - Distributed cognition occurs when cognitive and affective schemas are shared between two or more people during interpersonal discussion. Although extant research focuses on distributed cognition in decision making between health care providers and patients, studies show that caregivers are also highly influential in the treatment decisions of patients. However, there are little empirical data describing how and when families exert influence. The current article addresses this gap by examining decisional support in the context of cancer randomized clinical trial (RCT) decision making. Data are drawn from in-depth interviews with rural, Appalachian cancer patients (N = 46). Analysis of transcript data yielded empirical support for four distinct models of health decision making. The implications of these findings for developing interventions to improve the quality of treatment decision making and overall well-being are discussed.

KW - In-depth qualitative interviews

KW - USA

KW - cancer

KW - communication

KW - health disparities

KW - region: Appalachia

KW - treatment decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020675548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020675548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049732316645321

DO - 10.1177/1049732316645321

M3 - Article

C2 - 27179018

AN - SCOPUS:85020675548

VL - 27

SP - 1146

EP - 1159

JO - Qualitative Health Research

JF - Qualitative Health Research

SN - 1049-7323

IS - 8

ER -