Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans

Alyson Gruhlke, Cori Birkholz, Stephen T Neely, Judy Kopun, Hongyang Tan, Walt Jesteadt, Kendra K Schmid, Michael P Gorga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves (STCs) were measured in 65 hearing-impaired (HI) subjects at f2 frequencies of 2.0, 2.8, 4.0, and 5.6 kHz and L2 levels relative to sensation level (SL) from 10 dB to as much as 50 dB. Best frequency, cochlear-Amplifier gain (tip-to-tail difference, T-T), and tuning (Q ERB) were estimated from STCs. As with normal-hearing (NH) subjects, T-T differences and QERB decreased as L2 increased. T-T differences and QERB were reduced in HI ears (compared to normal) for conditions in which L2 was fixed relative to behavioral threshold (dB SL). When STCs were compared with L2 at constant sound pressure levels (dB SPL), differences between NH and HI subjects were reduced. The large effect of level and small effect of hearing loss were both confirmed by statistical analyses. Therefore, the magnitude of the differences in DPOAE STCs between NH and HI subjects is mainly dependent on the manner in which level (L2) is specified. Although this conclusion may appear to be at odds with previous, invasive measures of cochlear-response gain and tuning, the apparent inconsistency may be resolved when the manner of specifying stimulus level is taken into account.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3292-3304
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume132
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2012

Fingerprint

hearing
tuning
retarding
curves
products
auditory defects
ear
sound pressure
Tuning
Suppression
Hearing Impairment
stimuli
amplifiers
thresholds
Hearing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans. / Gruhlke, Alyson; Birkholz, Cori; Neely, Stephen T; Kopun, Judy; Tan, Hongyang; Jesteadt, Walt; Schmid, Kendra K; Gorga, Michael P.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 132, No. 5, 01.11.2012, p. 3292-3304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c28d361062ef468f9d922f43347f2a16,
title = "Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans",
abstract = "Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves (STCs) were measured in 65 hearing-impaired (HI) subjects at f2 frequencies of 2.0, 2.8, 4.0, and 5.6 kHz and L2 levels relative to sensation level (SL) from 10 dB to as much as 50 dB. Best frequency, cochlear-Amplifier gain (tip-to-tail difference, T-T), and tuning (Q ERB) were estimated from STCs. As with normal-hearing (NH) subjects, T-T differences and QERB decreased as L2 increased. T-T differences and QERB were reduced in HI ears (compared to normal) for conditions in which L2 was fixed relative to behavioral threshold (dB SL). When STCs were compared with L2 at constant sound pressure levels (dB SPL), differences between NH and HI subjects were reduced. The large effect of level and small effect of hearing loss were both confirmed by statistical analyses. Therefore, the magnitude of the differences in DPOAE STCs between NH and HI subjects is mainly dependent on the manner in which level (L2) is specified. Although this conclusion may appear to be at odds with previous, invasive measures of cochlear-response gain and tuning, the apparent inconsistency may be resolved when the manner of specifying stimulus level is taken into account.",
author = "Alyson Gruhlke and Cori Birkholz and Neely, {Stephen T} and Judy Kopun and Hongyang Tan and Walt Jesteadt and Schmid, {Kendra K} and Gorga, {Michael P}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.4754525",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
pages = "3292--3304",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans

AU - Gruhlke, Alyson

AU - Birkholz, Cori

AU - Neely, Stephen T

AU - Kopun, Judy

AU - Tan, Hongyang

AU - Jesteadt, Walt

AU - Schmid, Kendra K

AU - Gorga, Michael P

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves (STCs) were measured in 65 hearing-impaired (HI) subjects at f2 frequencies of 2.0, 2.8, 4.0, and 5.6 kHz and L2 levels relative to sensation level (SL) from 10 dB to as much as 50 dB. Best frequency, cochlear-Amplifier gain (tip-to-tail difference, T-T), and tuning (Q ERB) were estimated from STCs. As with normal-hearing (NH) subjects, T-T differences and QERB decreased as L2 increased. T-T differences and QERB were reduced in HI ears (compared to normal) for conditions in which L2 was fixed relative to behavioral threshold (dB SL). When STCs were compared with L2 at constant sound pressure levels (dB SPL), differences between NH and HI subjects were reduced. The large effect of level and small effect of hearing loss were both confirmed by statistical analyses. Therefore, the magnitude of the differences in DPOAE STCs between NH and HI subjects is mainly dependent on the manner in which level (L2) is specified. Although this conclusion may appear to be at odds with previous, invasive measures of cochlear-response gain and tuning, the apparent inconsistency may be resolved when the manner of specifying stimulus level is taken into account.

AB - Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves (STCs) were measured in 65 hearing-impaired (HI) subjects at f2 frequencies of 2.0, 2.8, 4.0, and 5.6 kHz and L2 levels relative to sensation level (SL) from 10 dB to as much as 50 dB. Best frequency, cochlear-Amplifier gain (tip-to-tail difference, T-T), and tuning (Q ERB) were estimated from STCs. As with normal-hearing (NH) subjects, T-T differences and QERB decreased as L2 increased. T-T differences and QERB were reduced in HI ears (compared to normal) for conditions in which L2 was fixed relative to behavioral threshold (dB SL). When STCs were compared with L2 at constant sound pressure levels (dB SPL), differences between NH and HI subjects were reduced. The large effect of level and small effect of hearing loss were both confirmed by statistical analyses. Therefore, the magnitude of the differences in DPOAE STCs between NH and HI subjects is mainly dependent on the manner in which level (L2) is specified. Although this conclusion may appear to be at odds with previous, invasive measures of cochlear-response gain and tuning, the apparent inconsistency may be resolved when the manner of specifying stimulus level is taken into account.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869102722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869102722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.4754525

DO - 10.1121/1.4754525

M3 - Article

C2 - 23145613

AN - SCOPUS:84869102722

VL - 132

SP - 3292

EP - 3304

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 5

ER -