Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans

Michael P Gorga, Stephen T Neely, Judy Kopun, Hongyang Tan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression data as a function of suppressor level (L 3) for f 2 frequencies from 0.5 to 8 kHz and L 2 levels from 10 to 60 dB sensation level were used to construct suppression tuning curves (STCs). DPOAE levels in the presence of suppressors were converted into decrement versus L 3 functions, and the L 3 levels resulting in 3 dB decrements were derived by transformed linear regression. These L 3 levels were plotted as a function of f 3 to construct STCs. When f 3 is represented on an octave scale, STCs were similar in shape across f 2 frequency. These STCs were analyzed to provide estimates of gain (tip-to-tail difference) and tuning (Q ERB). Both gain and tuning decreased as L 2 increased, regardless of f 2, but the trend with f 2 was not monotonic. A roughly linear relation was observed between gain and tuning at each frequency, such that gain increased by 4-16 dB (mean ≈ 5 dB) for every unit increase in Q ERB, although the pattern varied with frequency. These findings suggest consistent nonlinear processing across a wide frequency range in humans, although the nonlinear operation range is frequency dependent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)817-827
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume129
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

tuning
retarding
curves
products
suppressors
frequency ranges
octaves
Tuning
Suppression
regression analysis
trends
estimates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans. / Gorga, Michael P; Neely, Stephen T; Kopun, Judy; Tan, Hongyang.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 129, No. 2, 01.02.2011, p. 817-827.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd445a0d36c6424a928cf90f170fde35,
title = "Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans",
abstract = "Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression data as a function of suppressor level (L 3) for f 2 frequencies from 0.5 to 8 kHz and L 2 levels from 10 to 60 dB sensation level were used to construct suppression tuning curves (STCs). DPOAE levels in the presence of suppressors were converted into decrement versus L 3 functions, and the L 3 levels resulting in 3 dB decrements were derived by transformed linear regression. These L 3 levels were plotted as a function of f 3 to construct STCs. When f 3 is represented on an octave scale, STCs were similar in shape across f 2 frequency. These STCs were analyzed to provide estimates of gain (tip-to-tail difference) and tuning (Q ERB). Both gain and tuning decreased as L 2 increased, regardless of f 2, but the trend with f 2 was not monotonic. A roughly linear relation was observed between gain and tuning at each frequency, such that gain increased by 4-16 dB (mean ≈ 5 dB) for every unit increase in Q ERB, although the pattern varied with frequency. These findings suggest consistent nonlinear processing across a wide frequency range in humans, although the nonlinear operation range is frequency dependent.",
author = "Gorga, {Michael P} and Neely, {Stephen T} and Judy Kopun and Hongyang Tan",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.3531864",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "817--827",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans

AU - Gorga, Michael P

AU - Neely, Stephen T

AU - Kopun, Judy

AU - Tan, Hongyang

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression data as a function of suppressor level (L 3) for f 2 frequencies from 0.5 to 8 kHz and L 2 levels from 10 to 60 dB sensation level were used to construct suppression tuning curves (STCs). DPOAE levels in the presence of suppressors were converted into decrement versus L 3 functions, and the L 3 levels resulting in 3 dB decrements were derived by transformed linear regression. These L 3 levels were plotted as a function of f 3 to construct STCs. When f 3 is represented on an octave scale, STCs were similar in shape across f 2 frequency. These STCs were analyzed to provide estimates of gain (tip-to-tail difference) and tuning (Q ERB). Both gain and tuning decreased as L 2 increased, regardless of f 2, but the trend with f 2 was not monotonic. A roughly linear relation was observed between gain and tuning at each frequency, such that gain increased by 4-16 dB (mean ≈ 5 dB) for every unit increase in Q ERB, although the pattern varied with frequency. These findings suggest consistent nonlinear processing across a wide frequency range in humans, although the nonlinear operation range is frequency dependent.

AB - Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression data as a function of suppressor level (L 3) for f 2 frequencies from 0.5 to 8 kHz and L 2 levels from 10 to 60 dB sensation level were used to construct suppression tuning curves (STCs). DPOAE levels in the presence of suppressors were converted into decrement versus L 3 functions, and the L 3 levels resulting in 3 dB decrements were derived by transformed linear regression. These L 3 levels were plotted as a function of f 3 to construct STCs. When f 3 is represented on an octave scale, STCs were similar in shape across f 2 frequency. These STCs were analyzed to provide estimates of gain (tip-to-tail difference) and tuning (Q ERB). Both gain and tuning decreased as L 2 increased, regardless of f 2, but the trend with f 2 was not monotonic. A roughly linear relation was observed between gain and tuning at each frequency, such that gain increased by 4-16 dB (mean ≈ 5 dB) for every unit increase in Q ERB, although the pattern varied with frequency. These findings suggest consistent nonlinear processing across a wide frequency range in humans, although the nonlinear operation range is frequency dependent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952136143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952136143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.3531864

DO - 10.1121/1.3531864

M3 - Article

C2 - 21361440

AN - SCOPUS:79952136143

VL - 129

SP - 817

EP - 827

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 2

ER -