Disparities in children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the United States, 2007

Gopal K. Singh, Mohammad Siahpush, Michael D. Kogan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) or secondhand smoke in the home. METHODS: The 2007 National Survey of Children's Health (N = 90 853) was used to calculate the prevalence of children's exposure to ETS. State-level data on home smoking ban from the 2006 -2007 Current Population Survey-Tobacco Use Supplement were used to supplement analyses. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds of exposure. RESULTS: In 2007, 7.6% of US children, or 5.5 million children, lived in households where someone smoked inside the home. The prevalence varied from a low of 1.1% for Utah and 1.9% for California to a high of 17.9% for West Virginia and 17.6% in Kentucky. After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, children in Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania had 12 times higher odds and those in Wisconsin, Missouri, Delaware, and the District of Columbia had 10 times higher odds of being exposed to ETS than children in Utah. Compared with children from higher socioeconomic backgrounds, Hispanic ethnicity, and non-English-speaking households, children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds had 7.3 to 10.6 times higher adjusted odds; non-Hispanic white, black, American Indian, and mixed-race children had 2.0 to 2.6 times higher odds; and children from English-speaking households had 4.1 times higher odds of ETS exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable disparities exist in children's exposure to ETS, with geographic pattern strongly related to home smoking ban. Greater exposure to ETS among children in several states and disadvantaged socioeconomic groups is likely to exacerbate existing health disparities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-13
Number of pages10
JournalPediatrics
Volume126
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2010

Fingerprint

Environmental Exposure
Smoke
Tobacco
Smoking
Tobacco Smoke Pollution
North American Indians
Tobacco Use
Vulnerable Populations
Hispanic Americans
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Children's exposure to ETS
  • Geographic disparity
  • Home smoking ban
  • Race/ethnicity
  • Secondhand smoke
  • Socioeconomic status
  • State
  • United states

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Disparities in children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the United States, 2007. / Singh, Gopal K.; Siahpush, Mohammad; Kogan, Michael D.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 126, No. 1, 01.07.2010, p. 4-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{98f72d3b420d48628ea5f8dd52f91c1f,
title = "Disparities in children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the United States, 2007",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: This study examined racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) or secondhand smoke in the home. METHODS: The 2007 National Survey of Children's Health (N = 90 853) was used to calculate the prevalence of children's exposure to ETS. State-level data on home smoking ban from the 2006 -2007 Current Population Survey-Tobacco Use Supplement were used to supplement analyses. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds of exposure. RESULTS: In 2007, 7.6{\%} of US children, or 5.5 million children, lived in households where someone smoked inside the home. The prevalence varied from a low of 1.1{\%} for Utah and 1.9{\%} for California to a high of 17.9{\%} for West Virginia and 17.6{\%} in Kentucky. After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, children in Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania had 12 times higher odds and those in Wisconsin, Missouri, Delaware, and the District of Columbia had 10 times higher odds of being exposed to ETS than children in Utah. Compared with children from higher socioeconomic backgrounds, Hispanic ethnicity, and non-English-speaking households, children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds had 7.3 to 10.6 times higher adjusted odds; non-Hispanic white, black, American Indian, and mixed-race children had 2.0 to 2.6 times higher odds; and children from English-speaking households had 4.1 times higher odds of ETS exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable disparities exist in children's exposure to ETS, with geographic pattern strongly related to home smoking ban. Greater exposure to ETS among children in several states and disadvantaged socioeconomic groups is likely to exacerbate existing health disparities.",
keywords = "Children's exposure to ETS, Geographic disparity, Home smoking ban, Race/ethnicity, Secondhand smoke, Socioeconomic status, State, United states",
author = "Singh, {Gopal K.} and Mohammad Siahpush and Kogan, {Michael D.}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2009-2744",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "4--13",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disparities in children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the United States, 2007

AU - Singh, Gopal K.

AU - Siahpush, Mohammad

AU - Kogan, Michael D.

PY - 2010/7/1

Y1 - 2010/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study examined racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) or secondhand smoke in the home. METHODS: The 2007 National Survey of Children's Health (N = 90 853) was used to calculate the prevalence of children's exposure to ETS. State-level data on home smoking ban from the 2006 -2007 Current Population Survey-Tobacco Use Supplement were used to supplement analyses. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds of exposure. RESULTS: In 2007, 7.6% of US children, or 5.5 million children, lived in households where someone smoked inside the home. The prevalence varied from a low of 1.1% for Utah and 1.9% for California to a high of 17.9% for West Virginia and 17.6% in Kentucky. After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, children in Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania had 12 times higher odds and those in Wisconsin, Missouri, Delaware, and the District of Columbia had 10 times higher odds of being exposed to ETS than children in Utah. Compared with children from higher socioeconomic backgrounds, Hispanic ethnicity, and non-English-speaking households, children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds had 7.3 to 10.6 times higher adjusted odds; non-Hispanic white, black, American Indian, and mixed-race children had 2.0 to 2.6 times higher odds; and children from English-speaking households had 4.1 times higher odds of ETS exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable disparities exist in children's exposure to ETS, with geographic pattern strongly related to home smoking ban. Greater exposure to ETS among children in several states and disadvantaged socioeconomic groups is likely to exacerbate existing health disparities.

AB - OBJECTIVES: This study examined racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) or secondhand smoke in the home. METHODS: The 2007 National Survey of Children's Health (N = 90 853) was used to calculate the prevalence of children's exposure to ETS. State-level data on home smoking ban from the 2006 -2007 Current Population Survey-Tobacco Use Supplement were used to supplement analyses. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds of exposure. RESULTS: In 2007, 7.6% of US children, or 5.5 million children, lived in households where someone smoked inside the home. The prevalence varied from a low of 1.1% for Utah and 1.9% for California to a high of 17.9% for West Virginia and 17.6% in Kentucky. After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, children in Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania had 12 times higher odds and those in Wisconsin, Missouri, Delaware, and the District of Columbia had 10 times higher odds of being exposed to ETS than children in Utah. Compared with children from higher socioeconomic backgrounds, Hispanic ethnicity, and non-English-speaking households, children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds had 7.3 to 10.6 times higher adjusted odds; non-Hispanic white, black, American Indian, and mixed-race children had 2.0 to 2.6 times higher odds; and children from English-speaking households had 4.1 times higher odds of ETS exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable disparities exist in children's exposure to ETS, with geographic pattern strongly related to home smoking ban. Greater exposure to ETS among children in several states and disadvantaged socioeconomic groups is likely to exacerbate existing health disparities.

KW - Children's exposure to ETS

KW - Geographic disparity

KW - Home smoking ban

KW - Race/ethnicity

KW - Secondhand smoke

KW - Socioeconomic status

KW - State

KW - United states

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954357111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954357111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2009-2744

DO - 10.1542/peds.2009-2744

M3 - Article

C2 - 20587673

AN - SCOPUS:77954357111

VL - 126

SP - 4

EP - 13

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 1

ER -