Disparate degrees of hypervariable loop flexibility control T-cell receptor cross-reactivity, specificity, and binding mechanism

Daniel R. Scott, Oleg Y. Borbulevych, Kurt H. Piepenbrink, Steven A. Corcelli, Brian M. Baker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) recognize multiple antigenic peptides bound and presented by major histocompatibility complex molecules. TCR cross-reactivity has been attributed in part to the flexibility of TCR complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops, yet there have been limited direct studies of loop dynamics to determine the extent of its role. Here we studied the flexibility of the binding loops of the αβ TCR A6 using crystallographic, spectroscopic, and computational methods. A significant role for flexibility in binding and cross-reactivity was indicated only for the CDR3α and CDR3β hypervariable loops. Examination of the energy landscapes of these two loops indicated that CDR3β possesses a broad, smooth energy landscape, leading to rapid sampling in the free TCR of a range of conformations compatible with different ligands. The landscape for CDR3α is more rugged, resulting in more limited conformational sampling that leads to specificity for a reduced set of peptides as well as the major histocompatibility complex protein. In addition to informing on the mechanisms of cross-reactivity and specificity, the energy landscapes of the two loops indicate a complex mechanism for TCR binding, incorporating elements of both conformational selection and induced fit in a manner that blends features of popular models for TCR recognition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)385-400
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Molecular Biology
Volume414
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2 2011

Fingerprint

T-Cell Antigen Receptor
Major Histocompatibility Complex
Complementarity Determining Regions
Peptides
Ligands
Proteins

Keywords

  • conformational selection
  • cross-reactivity
  • immune recognition
  • induced fit
  • specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Structural Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Disparate degrees of hypervariable loop flexibility control T-cell receptor cross-reactivity, specificity, and binding mechanism. / Scott, Daniel R.; Borbulevych, Oleg Y.; Piepenbrink, Kurt H.; Corcelli, Steven A.; Baker, Brian M.

In: Journal of Molecular Biology, Vol. 414, No. 3, 02.12.2011, p. 385-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, Daniel R. ; Borbulevych, Oleg Y. ; Piepenbrink, Kurt H. ; Corcelli, Steven A. ; Baker, Brian M. / Disparate degrees of hypervariable loop flexibility control T-cell receptor cross-reactivity, specificity, and binding mechanism. In: Journal of Molecular Biology. 2011 ; Vol. 414, No. 3. pp. 385-400.
@article{e26f1e9a4512418bb1b746c1719da4fa,
title = "Disparate degrees of hypervariable loop flexibility control T-cell receptor cross-reactivity, specificity, and binding mechanism",
abstract = "αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) recognize multiple antigenic peptides bound and presented by major histocompatibility complex molecules. TCR cross-reactivity has been attributed in part to the flexibility of TCR complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops, yet there have been limited direct studies of loop dynamics to determine the extent of its role. Here we studied the flexibility of the binding loops of the αβ TCR A6 using crystallographic, spectroscopic, and computational methods. A significant role for flexibility in binding and cross-reactivity was indicated only for the CDR3α and CDR3β hypervariable loops. Examination of the energy landscapes of these two loops indicated that CDR3β possesses a broad, smooth energy landscape, leading to rapid sampling in the free TCR of a range of conformations compatible with different ligands. The landscape for CDR3α is more rugged, resulting in more limited conformational sampling that leads to specificity for a reduced set of peptides as well as the major histocompatibility complex protein. In addition to informing on the mechanisms of cross-reactivity and specificity, the energy landscapes of the two loops indicate a complex mechanism for TCR binding, incorporating elements of both conformational selection and induced fit in a manner that blends features of popular models for TCR recognition.",
keywords = "conformational selection, cross-reactivity, immune recognition, induced fit, specificity",
author = "Scott, {Daniel R.} and Borbulevych, {Oleg Y.} and Piepenbrink, {Kurt H.} and Corcelli, {Steven A.} and Baker, {Brian M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmb.2011.10.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "414",
pages = "385--400",
journal = "Journal of Molecular Biology",
issn = "0022-2836",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disparate degrees of hypervariable loop flexibility control T-cell receptor cross-reactivity, specificity, and binding mechanism

AU - Scott, Daniel R.

AU - Borbulevych, Oleg Y.

AU - Piepenbrink, Kurt H.

AU - Corcelli, Steven A.

AU - Baker, Brian M.

PY - 2011/12/2

Y1 - 2011/12/2

N2 - αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) recognize multiple antigenic peptides bound and presented by major histocompatibility complex molecules. TCR cross-reactivity has been attributed in part to the flexibility of TCR complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops, yet there have been limited direct studies of loop dynamics to determine the extent of its role. Here we studied the flexibility of the binding loops of the αβ TCR A6 using crystallographic, spectroscopic, and computational methods. A significant role for flexibility in binding and cross-reactivity was indicated only for the CDR3α and CDR3β hypervariable loops. Examination of the energy landscapes of these two loops indicated that CDR3β possesses a broad, smooth energy landscape, leading to rapid sampling in the free TCR of a range of conformations compatible with different ligands. The landscape for CDR3α is more rugged, resulting in more limited conformational sampling that leads to specificity for a reduced set of peptides as well as the major histocompatibility complex protein. In addition to informing on the mechanisms of cross-reactivity and specificity, the energy landscapes of the two loops indicate a complex mechanism for TCR binding, incorporating elements of both conformational selection and induced fit in a manner that blends features of popular models for TCR recognition.

AB - αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) recognize multiple antigenic peptides bound and presented by major histocompatibility complex molecules. TCR cross-reactivity has been attributed in part to the flexibility of TCR complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops, yet there have been limited direct studies of loop dynamics to determine the extent of its role. Here we studied the flexibility of the binding loops of the αβ TCR A6 using crystallographic, spectroscopic, and computational methods. A significant role for flexibility in binding and cross-reactivity was indicated only for the CDR3α and CDR3β hypervariable loops. Examination of the energy landscapes of these two loops indicated that CDR3β possesses a broad, smooth energy landscape, leading to rapid sampling in the free TCR of a range of conformations compatible with different ligands. The landscape for CDR3α is more rugged, resulting in more limited conformational sampling that leads to specificity for a reduced set of peptides as well as the major histocompatibility complex protein. In addition to informing on the mechanisms of cross-reactivity and specificity, the energy landscapes of the two loops indicate a complex mechanism for TCR binding, incorporating elements of both conformational selection and induced fit in a manner that blends features of popular models for TCR recognition.

KW - conformational selection

KW - cross-reactivity

KW - immune recognition

KW - induced fit

KW - specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82555168290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82555168290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.10.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 22019736

AN - SCOPUS:82555168290

VL - 414

SP - 385

EP - 400

JO - Journal of Molecular Biology

JF - Journal of Molecular Biology

SN - 0022-2836

IS - 3

ER -