Disarmament Decisions as Social Dilemmas

John T. Chibnall, Richard L Wiener

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The individual deciding on a nuclear weapons production policy is faced with a dilemma in which a choice must be made to support one of several conflicting defense policies. In order to investigate the social‐psychological variables that are related to armament policy decision making, a telephone survey was conducted in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Adult subjects (N= 110) responded to questions concerned with cognitive, attitudinal, and emotional responses to nuclear arms. Participants were also asked to choose a weapons production policy for the United States under conditions of continued and decreased Soviet nuclear arms production. Results indicated that respondents decisions about nuclear weapons production were related to their support for deterrence, the availability of their nuclear‐related images, their emotional response to nuclear war, their attributions of responsibility for the prevention of nuclear war, and their political party affiliation. Distinctions between antinuclear decision‐makers and pronuclear decision‐makers are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)867-879
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume18
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

Fingerprint

Nuclear Weapons
Weapons
Policy Making
Telephone
Decision Making
Surveys and Questionnaires
Warfare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Disarmament Decisions as Social Dilemmas. / Chibnall, John T.; Wiener, Richard L.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 10, 01.01.1988, p. 867-879.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chibnall, John T. ; Wiener, Richard L. / Disarmament Decisions as Social Dilemmas. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1988 ; Vol. 18, No. 10. pp. 867-879.
@article{d9b47285e24e4db083f53dc84154c272,
title = "Disarmament Decisions as Social Dilemmas",
abstract = "The individual deciding on a nuclear weapons production policy is faced with a dilemma in which a choice must be made to support one of several conflicting defense policies. In order to investigate the social‐psychological variables that are related to armament policy decision making, a telephone survey was conducted in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Adult subjects (N= 110) responded to questions concerned with cognitive, attitudinal, and emotional responses to nuclear arms. Participants were also asked to choose a weapons production policy for the United States under conditions of continued and decreased Soviet nuclear arms production. Results indicated that respondents decisions about nuclear weapons production were related to their support for deterrence, the availability of their nuclear‐related images, their emotional response to nuclear war, their attributions of responsibility for the prevention of nuclear war, and their political party affiliation. Distinctions between antinuclear decision‐makers and pronuclear decision‐makers are discussed.",
author = "Chibnall, {John T.} and Wiener, {Richard L}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01180.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "867--879",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disarmament Decisions as Social Dilemmas

AU - Chibnall, John T.

AU - Wiener, Richard L

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - The individual deciding on a nuclear weapons production policy is faced with a dilemma in which a choice must be made to support one of several conflicting defense policies. In order to investigate the social‐psychological variables that are related to armament policy decision making, a telephone survey was conducted in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Adult subjects (N= 110) responded to questions concerned with cognitive, attitudinal, and emotional responses to nuclear arms. Participants were also asked to choose a weapons production policy for the United States under conditions of continued and decreased Soviet nuclear arms production. Results indicated that respondents decisions about nuclear weapons production were related to their support for deterrence, the availability of their nuclear‐related images, their emotional response to nuclear war, their attributions of responsibility for the prevention of nuclear war, and their political party affiliation. Distinctions between antinuclear decision‐makers and pronuclear decision‐makers are discussed.

AB - The individual deciding on a nuclear weapons production policy is faced with a dilemma in which a choice must be made to support one of several conflicting defense policies. In order to investigate the social‐psychological variables that are related to armament policy decision making, a telephone survey was conducted in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Adult subjects (N= 110) responded to questions concerned with cognitive, attitudinal, and emotional responses to nuclear arms. Participants were also asked to choose a weapons production policy for the United States under conditions of continued and decreased Soviet nuclear arms production. Results indicated that respondents decisions about nuclear weapons production were related to their support for deterrence, the availability of their nuclear‐related images, their emotional response to nuclear war, their attributions of responsibility for the prevention of nuclear war, and their political party affiliation. Distinctions between antinuclear decision‐makers and pronuclear decision‐makers are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039685480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039685480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01180.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01180.x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 867

EP - 879

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 10

ER -