Direct comparison of feature tracking and autocorrelation for velocity estimation

Gregory R. Bashford, Derek J. Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Feature tracking is an algorithm for estimating tissue motion and blood flow using pulse-echo ultrasound. It was proposed as a computationally simpler alternative to other techniques such as autocorrelation and time-domain cross correlation. The advantage of feature tracking is that it selectively extracts easily identifiable parts of the speckle signal (e.g., the local maxima), reducing the amount of information being processed. Studies on feature tracking to date have used stationary, speckle-generating targets to simulate blood flow. Also, feature tracking has not been compared with accepted commercial methods. This study directly compares feature tracking performance with the complex autocorrelation method, which is the most common color flow algorithm. Experiments were performed with both a rotating string phantom and a commercial flow phantom surrounded by tissue-mimicking material, using 2.25 MHz and 3.5 MHz transducers, under more realistic signal-to-clutter (-15 to -35 dB) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (15 dB to 3 dB) than previous translating-phantom tests. The feature tracking approach is shown to produce mean estimates comparable to autocorrelation (R 2 = 0.9954 and 0.9960 for 6-sample and 12-sample autocorrelation, respectively, and R 2 = 0.9998 for both 6-sample and 12-sample feature tracking) for velocities ranging from 10 to 100 cm/s. The variance of feature-tracking estimates is shown to compare favorably to the complex autocorrelation approach using the same number of ensemble flow samples (19 to 28% lower standard deviation for 3.5 MHz, 36 to 55% lower standard deviation for 2.25 MHz). However, linear regression of the feature locations does not produce an appreciable improvement in estimation variance. Discussion of the need for further research, particularly in the areas of feature detection and feature correspondence, is given

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4154636
Pages (from-to)757-767
Number of pages11
JournalIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

Autocorrelation
autocorrelation
Speckle
Blood
Tissue
blood flow
standard deviation
Linear regression
Transducers
Signal to noise ratio
Ultrasonics
translating
clutter
Color
estimates
cross correlation
regression analysis
echoes
transducers
signal to noise ratios

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Instrumentation
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Direct comparison of feature tracking and autocorrelation for velocity estimation. / Bashford, Gregory R.; Robinson, Derek J.

In: IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, Vol. 54, No. 4, 4154636, 01.12.2007, p. 757-767.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d1694cf532348c3a91d48ed0d7d83b2,
title = "Direct comparison of feature tracking and autocorrelation for velocity estimation",
abstract = "Feature tracking is an algorithm for estimating tissue motion and blood flow using pulse-echo ultrasound. It was proposed as a computationally simpler alternative to other techniques such as autocorrelation and time-domain cross correlation. The advantage of feature tracking is that it selectively extracts easily identifiable parts of the speckle signal (e.g., the local maxima), reducing the amount of information being processed. Studies on feature tracking to date have used stationary, speckle-generating targets to simulate blood flow. Also, feature tracking has not been compared with accepted commercial methods. This study directly compares feature tracking performance with the complex autocorrelation method, which is the most common color flow algorithm. Experiments were performed with both a rotating string phantom and a commercial flow phantom surrounded by tissue-mimicking material, using 2.25 MHz and 3.5 MHz transducers, under more realistic signal-to-clutter (-15 to -35 dB) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (15 dB to 3 dB) than previous translating-phantom tests. The feature tracking approach is shown to produce mean estimates comparable to autocorrelation (R 2 = 0.9954 and 0.9960 for 6-sample and 12-sample autocorrelation, respectively, and R 2 = 0.9998 for both 6-sample and 12-sample feature tracking) for velocities ranging from 10 to 100 cm/s. The variance of feature-tracking estimates is shown to compare favorably to the complex autocorrelation approach using the same number of ensemble flow samples (19 to 28{\%} lower standard deviation for 3.5 MHz, 36 to 55{\%} lower standard deviation for 2.25 MHz). However, linear regression of the feature locations does not produce an appreciable improvement in estimation variance. Discussion of the need for further research, particularly in the areas of feature detection and feature correspondence, is given",
author = "Bashford, {Gregory R.} and Robinson, {Derek J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TUFFC.2007.309",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "757--767",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control",
issn = "0885-3010",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direct comparison of feature tracking and autocorrelation for velocity estimation

AU - Bashford, Gregory R.

AU - Robinson, Derek J.

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Feature tracking is an algorithm for estimating tissue motion and blood flow using pulse-echo ultrasound. It was proposed as a computationally simpler alternative to other techniques such as autocorrelation and time-domain cross correlation. The advantage of feature tracking is that it selectively extracts easily identifiable parts of the speckle signal (e.g., the local maxima), reducing the amount of information being processed. Studies on feature tracking to date have used stationary, speckle-generating targets to simulate blood flow. Also, feature tracking has not been compared with accepted commercial methods. This study directly compares feature tracking performance with the complex autocorrelation method, which is the most common color flow algorithm. Experiments were performed with both a rotating string phantom and a commercial flow phantom surrounded by tissue-mimicking material, using 2.25 MHz and 3.5 MHz transducers, under more realistic signal-to-clutter (-15 to -35 dB) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (15 dB to 3 dB) than previous translating-phantom tests. The feature tracking approach is shown to produce mean estimates comparable to autocorrelation (R 2 = 0.9954 and 0.9960 for 6-sample and 12-sample autocorrelation, respectively, and R 2 = 0.9998 for both 6-sample and 12-sample feature tracking) for velocities ranging from 10 to 100 cm/s. The variance of feature-tracking estimates is shown to compare favorably to the complex autocorrelation approach using the same number of ensemble flow samples (19 to 28% lower standard deviation for 3.5 MHz, 36 to 55% lower standard deviation for 2.25 MHz). However, linear regression of the feature locations does not produce an appreciable improvement in estimation variance. Discussion of the need for further research, particularly in the areas of feature detection and feature correspondence, is given

AB - Feature tracking is an algorithm for estimating tissue motion and blood flow using pulse-echo ultrasound. It was proposed as a computationally simpler alternative to other techniques such as autocorrelation and time-domain cross correlation. The advantage of feature tracking is that it selectively extracts easily identifiable parts of the speckle signal (e.g., the local maxima), reducing the amount of information being processed. Studies on feature tracking to date have used stationary, speckle-generating targets to simulate blood flow. Also, feature tracking has not been compared with accepted commercial methods. This study directly compares feature tracking performance with the complex autocorrelation method, which is the most common color flow algorithm. Experiments were performed with both a rotating string phantom and a commercial flow phantom surrounded by tissue-mimicking material, using 2.25 MHz and 3.5 MHz transducers, under more realistic signal-to-clutter (-15 to -35 dB) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (15 dB to 3 dB) than previous translating-phantom tests. The feature tracking approach is shown to produce mean estimates comparable to autocorrelation (R 2 = 0.9954 and 0.9960 for 6-sample and 12-sample autocorrelation, respectively, and R 2 = 0.9998 for both 6-sample and 12-sample feature tracking) for velocities ranging from 10 to 100 cm/s. The variance of feature-tracking estimates is shown to compare favorably to the complex autocorrelation approach using the same number of ensemble flow samples (19 to 28% lower standard deviation for 3.5 MHz, 36 to 55% lower standard deviation for 2.25 MHz). However, linear regression of the feature locations does not produce an appreciable improvement in estimation variance. Discussion of the need for further research, particularly in the areas of feature detection and feature correspondence, is given

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248584825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248584825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TUFFC.2007.309

DO - 10.1109/TUFFC.2007.309

M3 - Article

C2 - 17441585

AN - SCOPUS:34248584825

VL - 54

SP - 757

EP - 767

JO - IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control

JF - IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control

SN - 0885-3010

IS - 4

M1 - 4154636

ER -