Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence: An international consensus

Mona M. Baharestani, Joyce M. Black, Keryln Carville, Michael Clark, Janet E. Cuddigan, Carol Dealey, Tom Defloor, Keith G. Harding, Nils A. Lahmann, Maarten J. Lubbers, Courtney H. Lyder, Takehiko Ohura, Heather L. Orsted, Steve I. Reger, Marco Romanelli, Hiromi Sanada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence data are increasingly being used as indicators of quality of care and the efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention protocols. In some health care systems, the occurrence of pressure ulcers is also being linked to reimbursement. The wider use of these epidemiological analyses necessitates that all those involved in pressure ulcer care and prevention have a clear understanding of the definitions and implications of prevalence and incidence rates. In addition, an appreciation of the potential difficulties in conducting prevalence and incidence studies and the possible explanations for differences between studies are important. An international group of experts has worked to produce a consensus document that aims to delineate and discuss the important issues involved, and to provide guidance on approaches to conducting and interpreting pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence studies. The group's main findings are summarised in this paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-104
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Wound Journal
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2009

Fingerprint

Pressure Ulcer
Incidence
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Quality of Health Care
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Incidence
  • Pressure ulcer
  • Prevalence
  • Prevention
  • Quality of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Cite this

Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence : An international consensus. / Baharestani, Mona M.; Black, Joyce M.; Carville, Keryln; Clark, Michael; Cuddigan, Janet E.; Dealey, Carol; Defloor, Tom; Harding, Keith G.; Lahmann, Nils A.; Lubbers, Maarten J.; Lyder, Courtney H.; Ohura, Takehiko; Orsted, Heather L.; Reger, Steve I.; Romanelli, Marco; Sanada, Hiromi.

In: International Wound Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.04.2009, p. 97-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baharestani, MM, Black, JM, Carville, K, Clark, M, Cuddigan, JE, Dealey, C, Defloor, T, Harding, KG, Lahmann, NA, Lubbers, MJ, Lyder, CH, Ohura, T, Orsted, HL, Reger, SI, Romanelli, M & Sanada, H 2009, 'Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence: An international consensus', International Wound Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00593.x
Baharestani, Mona M. ; Black, Joyce M. ; Carville, Keryln ; Clark, Michael ; Cuddigan, Janet E. ; Dealey, Carol ; Defloor, Tom ; Harding, Keith G. ; Lahmann, Nils A. ; Lubbers, Maarten J. ; Lyder, Courtney H. ; Ohura, Takehiko ; Orsted, Heather L. ; Reger, Steve I. ; Romanelli, Marco ; Sanada, Hiromi. / Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence : An international consensus. In: International Wound Journal. 2009 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 97-104.
@article{81e49ba44e314a3a9da09347baa7d779,
title = "Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence: An international consensus",
abstract = "Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence data are increasingly being used as indicators of quality of care and the efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention protocols. In some health care systems, the occurrence of pressure ulcers is also being linked to reimbursement. The wider use of these epidemiological analyses necessitates that all those involved in pressure ulcer care and prevention have a clear understanding of the definitions and implications of prevalence and incidence rates. In addition, an appreciation of the potential difficulties in conducting prevalence and incidence studies and the possible explanations for differences between studies are important. An international group of experts has worked to produce a consensus document that aims to delineate and discuss the important issues involved, and to provide guidance on approaches to conducting and interpreting pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence studies. The group's main findings are summarised in this paper.",
keywords = "Incidence, Pressure ulcer, Prevalence, Prevention, Quality of care",
author = "Baharestani, {Mona M.} and Black, {Joyce M.} and Keryln Carville and Michael Clark and Cuddigan, {Janet E.} and Carol Dealey and Tom Defloor and Harding, {Keith G.} and Lahmann, {Nils A.} and Lubbers, {Maarten J.} and Lyder, {Courtney H.} and Takehiko Ohura and Orsted, {Heather L.} and Reger, {Steve I.} and Marco Romanelli and Hiromi Sanada",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00593.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "97--104",
journal = "International Wound Journal",
issn = "1742-4801",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence

T2 - An international consensus

AU - Baharestani, Mona M.

AU - Black, Joyce M.

AU - Carville, Keryln

AU - Clark, Michael

AU - Cuddigan, Janet E.

AU - Dealey, Carol

AU - Defloor, Tom

AU - Harding, Keith G.

AU - Lahmann, Nils A.

AU - Lubbers, Maarten J.

AU - Lyder, Courtney H.

AU - Ohura, Takehiko

AU - Orsted, Heather L.

AU - Reger, Steve I.

AU - Romanelli, Marco

AU - Sanada, Hiromi

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence data are increasingly being used as indicators of quality of care and the efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention protocols. In some health care systems, the occurrence of pressure ulcers is also being linked to reimbursement. The wider use of these epidemiological analyses necessitates that all those involved in pressure ulcer care and prevention have a clear understanding of the definitions and implications of prevalence and incidence rates. In addition, an appreciation of the potential difficulties in conducting prevalence and incidence studies and the possible explanations for differences between studies are important. An international group of experts has worked to produce a consensus document that aims to delineate and discuss the important issues involved, and to provide guidance on approaches to conducting and interpreting pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence studies. The group's main findings are summarised in this paper.

AB - Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence data are increasingly being used as indicators of quality of care and the efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention protocols. In some health care systems, the occurrence of pressure ulcers is also being linked to reimbursement. The wider use of these epidemiological analyses necessitates that all those involved in pressure ulcer care and prevention have a clear understanding of the definitions and implications of prevalence and incidence rates. In addition, an appreciation of the potential difficulties in conducting prevalence and incidence studies and the possible explanations for differences between studies are important. An international group of experts has worked to produce a consensus document that aims to delineate and discuss the important issues involved, and to provide guidance on approaches to conducting and interpreting pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence studies. The group's main findings are summarised in this paper.

KW - Incidence

KW - Pressure ulcer

KW - Prevalence

KW - Prevention

KW - Quality of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65349151294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65349151294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00593.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00593.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19432659

AN - SCOPUS:65349151294

VL - 6

SP - 97

EP - 104

JO - International Wound Journal

JF - International Wound Journal

SN - 1742-4801

IS - 2

ER -