Differential diagnosis of proximal biliary obstruction

Chandrakanth Are, Mithat Gonen, Michael D'Angelica, Ronald P. DeMatteo, Yuman Fong, Leslie H. Blumgart, William R. Jarnagin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Obstruction at the hepatic duct confluence is generally due to hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). However, in up to 15% of patients, hilar obstruction could be due to alternative diagnoses other than HCCA. The aim of this study was to determine preoperative criteria that could differentiate HCCA from the alternative diagnoses. Methods: All patients with hilar obstruction presumed to represent HCCA were included (1997-2001). The extent of disease was assessed preoperatively with computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and Duplex ultrasonography, and these findings were correlated to the final histopathology. Results: A total of 171 patients were included in the study, with HCCA being the most common diagnosis (141 patients [82.4%], group I). Alternative diagnoses other than HCCA were encountered in 30 patients (17.5%, group II) and included benign stricture (9 patients [5.2%]) and other malignancy (21 patients [12%]). There was a higher incidence of involvement of the second-order bile ducts in group I (26% vs 3% in group II, P < .01). Vascular involvement and lobar atrophy were more common in group I (58% and 41%) when compared with group II (16% and 6%, P < .005 and P < .002). The combination of these 2 findings (vascular invasion + lobar atrophy) was reliable for discriminating patients with HCCA from the alternative diagnoses. (38% in group I and 3.3% in group II, P < .001). Conclusions: Involvement of second-order bile ducts, vascular invasion, and lobar atrophy are more likely in patients with HCCA. The combination of vascular invasion and lobar atrophy significantly increases the diagnostic likelihood of HCCA. The absence of these findings should raise awareness of the possibility of an alternative diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)756-763
Number of pages8
JournalSurgery
Volume140
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2006

Fingerprint

Klatskin Tumor
Differential Diagnosis
Atrophy
Blood Vessels
Bile Ducts
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography
Common Hepatic Duct
Ultrasonography
Pathologic Constriction
Tomography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Are, C., Gonen, M., D'Angelica, M., DeMatteo, R. P., Fong, Y., Blumgart, L. H., & Jarnagin, W. R. (2006). Differential diagnosis of proximal biliary obstruction. Surgery, 140(5), 756-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.03.028

Differential diagnosis of proximal biliary obstruction. / Are, Chandrakanth; Gonen, Mithat; D'Angelica, Michael; DeMatteo, Ronald P.; Fong, Yuman; Blumgart, Leslie H.; Jarnagin, William R.

In: Surgery, Vol. 140, No. 5, 01.11.2006, p. 756-763.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Are, C, Gonen, M, D'Angelica, M, DeMatteo, RP, Fong, Y, Blumgart, LH & Jarnagin, WR 2006, 'Differential diagnosis of proximal biliary obstruction', Surgery, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 756-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.03.028
Are C, Gonen M, D'Angelica M, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH et al. Differential diagnosis of proximal biliary obstruction. Surgery. 2006 Nov 1;140(5):756-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.03.028
Are, Chandrakanth ; Gonen, Mithat ; D'Angelica, Michael ; DeMatteo, Ronald P. ; Fong, Yuman ; Blumgart, Leslie H. ; Jarnagin, William R. / Differential diagnosis of proximal biliary obstruction. In: Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 140, No. 5. pp. 756-763.
@article{0993273d3da342a7afdc69e7a64def2d,
title = "Differential diagnosis of proximal biliary obstruction",
abstract = "Background: Obstruction at the hepatic duct confluence is generally due to hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). However, in up to 15{\%} of patients, hilar obstruction could be due to alternative diagnoses other than HCCA. The aim of this study was to determine preoperative criteria that could differentiate HCCA from the alternative diagnoses. Methods: All patients with hilar obstruction presumed to represent HCCA were included (1997-2001). The extent of disease was assessed preoperatively with computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and Duplex ultrasonography, and these findings were correlated to the final histopathology. Results: A total of 171 patients were included in the study, with HCCA being the most common diagnosis (141 patients [82.4{\%}], group I). Alternative diagnoses other than HCCA were encountered in 30 patients (17.5{\%}, group II) and included benign stricture (9 patients [5.2{\%}]) and other malignancy (21 patients [12{\%}]). There was a higher incidence of involvement of the second-order bile ducts in group I (26{\%} vs 3{\%} in group II, P < .01). Vascular involvement and lobar atrophy were more common in group I (58{\%} and 41{\%}) when compared with group II (16{\%} and 6{\%}, P < .005 and P < .002). The combination of these 2 findings (vascular invasion + lobar atrophy) was reliable for discriminating patients with HCCA from the alternative diagnoses. (38{\%} in group I and 3.3{\%} in group II, P < .001). Conclusions: Involvement of second-order bile ducts, vascular invasion, and lobar atrophy are more likely in patients with HCCA. The combination of vascular invasion and lobar atrophy significantly increases the diagnostic likelihood of HCCA. The absence of these findings should raise awareness of the possibility of an alternative diagnosis.",
author = "Chandrakanth Are and Mithat Gonen and Michael D'Angelica and DeMatteo, {Ronald P.} and Yuman Fong and Blumgart, {Leslie H.} and Jarnagin, {William R.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.surg.2006.03.028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
pages = "756--763",
journal = "Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0039-6060",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential diagnosis of proximal biliary obstruction

AU - Are, Chandrakanth

AU - Gonen, Mithat

AU - D'Angelica, Michael

AU - DeMatteo, Ronald P.

AU - Fong, Yuman

AU - Blumgart, Leslie H.

AU - Jarnagin, William R.

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - Background: Obstruction at the hepatic duct confluence is generally due to hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). However, in up to 15% of patients, hilar obstruction could be due to alternative diagnoses other than HCCA. The aim of this study was to determine preoperative criteria that could differentiate HCCA from the alternative diagnoses. Methods: All patients with hilar obstruction presumed to represent HCCA were included (1997-2001). The extent of disease was assessed preoperatively with computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and Duplex ultrasonography, and these findings were correlated to the final histopathology. Results: A total of 171 patients were included in the study, with HCCA being the most common diagnosis (141 patients [82.4%], group I). Alternative diagnoses other than HCCA were encountered in 30 patients (17.5%, group II) and included benign stricture (9 patients [5.2%]) and other malignancy (21 patients [12%]). There was a higher incidence of involvement of the second-order bile ducts in group I (26% vs 3% in group II, P < .01). Vascular involvement and lobar atrophy were more common in group I (58% and 41%) when compared with group II (16% and 6%, P < .005 and P < .002). The combination of these 2 findings (vascular invasion + lobar atrophy) was reliable for discriminating patients with HCCA from the alternative diagnoses. (38% in group I and 3.3% in group II, P < .001). Conclusions: Involvement of second-order bile ducts, vascular invasion, and lobar atrophy are more likely in patients with HCCA. The combination of vascular invasion and lobar atrophy significantly increases the diagnostic likelihood of HCCA. The absence of these findings should raise awareness of the possibility of an alternative diagnosis.

AB - Background: Obstruction at the hepatic duct confluence is generally due to hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). However, in up to 15% of patients, hilar obstruction could be due to alternative diagnoses other than HCCA. The aim of this study was to determine preoperative criteria that could differentiate HCCA from the alternative diagnoses. Methods: All patients with hilar obstruction presumed to represent HCCA were included (1997-2001). The extent of disease was assessed preoperatively with computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and Duplex ultrasonography, and these findings were correlated to the final histopathology. Results: A total of 171 patients were included in the study, with HCCA being the most common diagnosis (141 patients [82.4%], group I). Alternative diagnoses other than HCCA were encountered in 30 patients (17.5%, group II) and included benign stricture (9 patients [5.2%]) and other malignancy (21 patients [12%]). There was a higher incidence of involvement of the second-order bile ducts in group I (26% vs 3% in group II, P < .01). Vascular involvement and lobar atrophy were more common in group I (58% and 41%) when compared with group II (16% and 6%, P < .005 and P < .002). The combination of these 2 findings (vascular invasion + lobar atrophy) was reliable for discriminating patients with HCCA from the alternative diagnoses. (38% in group I and 3.3% in group II, P < .001). Conclusions: Involvement of second-order bile ducts, vascular invasion, and lobar atrophy are more likely in patients with HCCA. The combination of vascular invasion and lobar atrophy significantly increases the diagnostic likelihood of HCCA. The absence of these findings should raise awareness of the possibility of an alternative diagnosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750455509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750455509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2006.03.028

DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2006.03.028

M3 - Article

C2 - 17084718

AN - SCOPUS:33750455509

VL - 140

SP - 756

EP - 763

JO - Surgery (United States)

JF - Surgery (United States)

SN - 0039-6060

IS - 5

ER -