Differential contribution of genomic regions to marked genetic variation and prediction of quantitative traits in broiler chickens

Rostam Abdollahi-Arpanahi, Gota Morota, Bruno D. Valente, Andreas Kranis, Guilherme J.M. Rosa, Daniel Gianola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Genome-wide association studies in humans have found enrichment of trait-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in coding regions of the genome and depletion of these in intergenic regions. However, a recent release of the ENCyclopedia of DNA elements showed that ~80 % of the human genome has a biochemical function. Similar studies on the chicken genome are lacking, thus assessing the relative contribution of its genic and non-genic regions to variation is relevant for biological studies and genetic improvement of chicken populations. Methods: A dataset including 1351 birds that were genotyped with the 600K Affymetrix platform was used. We partitioned SNPs according to genome annotation data into six classes to characterize the relative contribution of genic and non-genic regions to genetic variation as well as their predictive power using all available quality-filtered SNPs. Target traits were body weight, ultrasound measurement of breast muscle and hen house egg production in broiler chickens. Six genomic regions were considered: intergenic regions, introns, missense, synonymous, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions, and regions that are located 5 kb upstream and downstream of coding genes. Genomic relationship matrices were constructed for each genomic region and fitted in the models, separately or simultaneously. Kernel-based ridge regression was used to estimate variance components and assess predictive ability. Contribution of each class of genomic regions to dominance variance was also considered. Results: Variance component estimates indicated that all genomic regions contributed to marked additive genetic variation and that the class of synonymous regions tended to have the greatest contribution. The marked dominance genetic variation explained by each class of genomic regions was similar and negligible (~0.05). In terms of prediction mean-square error, the whole-genome approach showed the best predictive ability. Conclusions: All genic and non-genic regions contributed to phenotypic variation for the three traits studied. Overall, the contribution of additive genetic variance to the total genetic variance was much greater than that of dominance variance. Our results show that all genomic regions are important for the prediction of the targeted traits, and the whole-genome approach was reaffirmed as the best tool for genome-enabled prediction of quantitative traits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number10
JournalGenetics Selection Evolution
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 3 2016

Fingerprint

quantitative traits
genetic variation
Chickens
genomics
broiler chickens
Genome
genome
prediction
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Intergenic DNA
single nucleotide polymorphism
dominance (genetics)
genetic variance
intergenic DNA
Encyclopedias
chickens
5' Untranslated Regions
Genome-Wide Association Study
polymorphism
3' Untranslated Regions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Genetics

Cite this

Differential contribution of genomic regions to marked genetic variation and prediction of quantitative traits in broiler chickens. / Abdollahi-Arpanahi, Rostam; Morota, Gota; Valente, Bruno D.; Kranis, Andreas; Rosa, Guilherme J.M.; Gianola, Daniel.

In: Genetics Selection Evolution, Vol. 48, No. 1, 10, 03.02.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abdollahi-Arpanahi, Rostam ; Morota, Gota ; Valente, Bruno D. ; Kranis, Andreas ; Rosa, Guilherme J.M. ; Gianola, Daniel. / Differential contribution of genomic regions to marked genetic variation and prediction of quantitative traits in broiler chickens. In: Genetics Selection Evolution. 2016 ; Vol. 48, No. 1.
@article{5456fad47beb40f5892fb12aec47cf23,
title = "Differential contribution of genomic regions to marked genetic variation and prediction of quantitative traits in broiler chickens",
abstract = "Background: Genome-wide association studies in humans have found enrichment of trait-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in coding regions of the genome and depletion of these in intergenic regions. However, a recent release of the ENCyclopedia of DNA elements showed that ~80 {\%} of the human genome has a biochemical function. Similar studies on the chicken genome are lacking, thus assessing the relative contribution of its genic and non-genic regions to variation is relevant for biological studies and genetic improvement of chicken populations. Methods: A dataset including 1351 birds that were genotyped with the 600K Affymetrix platform was used. We partitioned SNPs according to genome annotation data into six classes to characterize the relative contribution of genic and non-genic regions to genetic variation as well as their predictive power using all available quality-filtered SNPs. Target traits were body weight, ultrasound measurement of breast muscle and hen house egg production in broiler chickens. Six genomic regions were considered: intergenic regions, introns, missense, synonymous, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions, and regions that are located 5 kb upstream and downstream of coding genes. Genomic relationship matrices were constructed for each genomic region and fitted in the models, separately or simultaneously. Kernel-based ridge regression was used to estimate variance components and assess predictive ability. Contribution of each class of genomic regions to dominance variance was also considered. Results: Variance component estimates indicated that all genomic regions contributed to marked additive genetic variation and that the class of synonymous regions tended to have the greatest contribution. The marked dominance genetic variation explained by each class of genomic regions was similar and negligible (~0.05). In terms of prediction mean-square error, the whole-genome approach showed the best predictive ability. Conclusions: All genic and non-genic regions contributed to phenotypic variation for the three traits studied. Overall, the contribution of additive genetic variance to the total genetic variance was much greater than that of dominance variance. Our results show that all genomic regions are important for the prediction of the targeted traits, and the whole-genome approach was reaffirmed as the best tool for genome-enabled prediction of quantitative traits.",
author = "Rostam Abdollahi-Arpanahi and Gota Morota and Valente, {Bruno D.} and Andreas Kranis and Rosa, {Guilherme J.M.} and Daniel Gianola",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1186/s12711-016-0187-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
journal = "Genetics Selection Evolution",
issn = "0999-193X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential contribution of genomic regions to marked genetic variation and prediction of quantitative traits in broiler chickens

AU - Abdollahi-Arpanahi, Rostam

AU - Morota, Gota

AU - Valente, Bruno D.

AU - Kranis, Andreas

AU - Rosa, Guilherme J.M.

AU - Gianola, Daniel

PY - 2016/2/3

Y1 - 2016/2/3

N2 - Background: Genome-wide association studies in humans have found enrichment of trait-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in coding regions of the genome and depletion of these in intergenic regions. However, a recent release of the ENCyclopedia of DNA elements showed that ~80 % of the human genome has a biochemical function. Similar studies on the chicken genome are lacking, thus assessing the relative contribution of its genic and non-genic regions to variation is relevant for biological studies and genetic improvement of chicken populations. Methods: A dataset including 1351 birds that were genotyped with the 600K Affymetrix platform was used. We partitioned SNPs according to genome annotation data into six classes to characterize the relative contribution of genic and non-genic regions to genetic variation as well as their predictive power using all available quality-filtered SNPs. Target traits were body weight, ultrasound measurement of breast muscle and hen house egg production in broiler chickens. Six genomic regions were considered: intergenic regions, introns, missense, synonymous, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions, and regions that are located 5 kb upstream and downstream of coding genes. Genomic relationship matrices were constructed for each genomic region and fitted in the models, separately or simultaneously. Kernel-based ridge regression was used to estimate variance components and assess predictive ability. Contribution of each class of genomic regions to dominance variance was also considered. Results: Variance component estimates indicated that all genomic regions contributed to marked additive genetic variation and that the class of synonymous regions tended to have the greatest contribution. The marked dominance genetic variation explained by each class of genomic regions was similar and negligible (~0.05). In terms of prediction mean-square error, the whole-genome approach showed the best predictive ability. Conclusions: All genic and non-genic regions contributed to phenotypic variation for the three traits studied. Overall, the contribution of additive genetic variance to the total genetic variance was much greater than that of dominance variance. Our results show that all genomic regions are important for the prediction of the targeted traits, and the whole-genome approach was reaffirmed as the best tool for genome-enabled prediction of quantitative traits.

AB - Background: Genome-wide association studies in humans have found enrichment of trait-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in coding regions of the genome and depletion of these in intergenic regions. However, a recent release of the ENCyclopedia of DNA elements showed that ~80 % of the human genome has a biochemical function. Similar studies on the chicken genome are lacking, thus assessing the relative contribution of its genic and non-genic regions to variation is relevant for biological studies and genetic improvement of chicken populations. Methods: A dataset including 1351 birds that were genotyped with the 600K Affymetrix platform was used. We partitioned SNPs according to genome annotation data into six classes to characterize the relative contribution of genic and non-genic regions to genetic variation as well as their predictive power using all available quality-filtered SNPs. Target traits were body weight, ultrasound measurement of breast muscle and hen house egg production in broiler chickens. Six genomic regions were considered: intergenic regions, introns, missense, synonymous, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions, and regions that are located 5 kb upstream and downstream of coding genes. Genomic relationship matrices were constructed for each genomic region and fitted in the models, separately or simultaneously. Kernel-based ridge regression was used to estimate variance components and assess predictive ability. Contribution of each class of genomic regions to dominance variance was also considered. Results: Variance component estimates indicated that all genomic regions contributed to marked additive genetic variation and that the class of synonymous regions tended to have the greatest contribution. The marked dominance genetic variation explained by each class of genomic regions was similar and negligible (~0.05). In terms of prediction mean-square error, the whole-genome approach showed the best predictive ability. Conclusions: All genic and non-genic regions contributed to phenotypic variation for the three traits studied. Overall, the contribution of additive genetic variance to the total genetic variance was much greater than that of dominance variance. Our results show that all genomic regions are important for the prediction of the targeted traits, and the whole-genome approach was reaffirmed as the best tool for genome-enabled prediction of quantitative traits.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956699517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956699517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12711-016-0187-z

DO - 10.1186/s12711-016-0187-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 26842494

AN - SCOPUS:84956699517

VL - 48

JO - Genetics Selection Evolution

JF - Genetics Selection Evolution

SN - 0999-193X

IS - 1

M1 - 10

ER -