Differences among estimates of critical power and anaerobic work capacity derived from five mathematical models and the three-minute all-out test

Haley C. Bergstrom, Terry J. Housh, Jorge M. Zuniga, Daniel A. Traylor, Robert W. Lewis, Clayton L. Camic, Richard J. Schmidt, Glen O. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bergstrom, HC, Housh, TJ, Zuniga, JM, Traylor, DA, Lewis, RW Jr, Camic, CL, Schmidt, RJ, and Johnson, GO. Differences among estimates of critical power and anaerobic work capacity derived from five mathematical models and the three-minute all-out test. J Strength Cond Res 28(3): 592-600, 2014- Estimates of critical power (CP) and anaerobic work capacity (AWC) from the power output vs. time relationship have been derived from various mathematical models. The purpose of this study was to examine estimates of CP and AWC from the multiple work bout, 2- and 3-parameter models, and those from the 3-minute all-out CP (CP3min) test. Nine college-aged subjects performed a maximal incremental test to determine the peak oxygen consumption rate and the gas exchange threshold. On separate days, each subject completed 4 randomly ordered constant power output rides to exhaustion to estimate CP and AWC from 5 regression models (2 linear, 2 nonlinear, and 1 exponential). During the final visit, CP and AWC were estimated from the CP3min test. The nonlinear 3-parameter (Nonlinear-3) model produced the lowest estimate of CP. The exponential (EXP) model and the CP3min test were not statistically different and produced the highest estimates of CP. Critical power estimated from the Nonlinear-3 model was 14% less than those from the EXP model and the CP3min test and 4-6% less than those from the linear models. Furthermore, the Nonlinear-3 and nonlinear 2-parameter (Nonlinear-2) models produced significantly greater estimates of AWC than did the linear models and CP3min. The current findings suggested that the Nonlinear-3 model may provide estimates of CP and AWC that more accurately reflect the asymptote of the power output vs. time relationship, the demarcation of the heavy and severe exercise intensity domains, and anaerobic capabilities than will the linear models and CP3min test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)592-600
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of strength and conditioning research
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Theoretical Models
Linear Models
Oxygen Consumption
Gases

Keywords

  • Aerobic exercise
  • Anaerobic exercise
  • Exercise testing
  • Fatigue thresholds
  • Theoretical model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Differences among estimates of critical power and anaerobic work capacity derived from five mathematical models and the three-minute all-out test. / Bergstrom, Haley C.; Housh, Terry J.; Zuniga, Jorge M.; Traylor, Daniel A.; Lewis, Robert W.; Camic, Clayton L.; Schmidt, Richard J.; Johnson, Glen O.

In: Journal of strength and conditioning research, Vol. 28, No. 3, 03.2014, p. 592-600.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bergstrom, Haley C. ; Housh, Terry J. ; Zuniga, Jorge M. ; Traylor, Daniel A. ; Lewis, Robert W. ; Camic, Clayton L. ; Schmidt, Richard J. ; Johnson, Glen O. / Differences among estimates of critical power and anaerobic work capacity derived from five mathematical models and the three-minute all-out test. In: Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 592-600.
@article{50f8fa91c0da433c973191017577f5d3,
title = "Differences among estimates of critical power and anaerobic work capacity derived from five mathematical models and the three-minute all-out test",
abstract = "Bergstrom, HC, Housh, TJ, Zuniga, JM, Traylor, DA, Lewis, RW Jr, Camic, CL, Schmidt, RJ, and Johnson, GO. Differences among estimates of critical power and anaerobic work capacity derived from five mathematical models and the three-minute all-out test. J Strength Cond Res 28(3): 592-600, 2014- Estimates of critical power (CP) and anaerobic work capacity (AWC) from the power output vs. time relationship have been derived from various mathematical models. The purpose of this study was to examine estimates of CP and AWC from the multiple work bout, 2- and 3-parameter models, and those from the 3-minute all-out CP (CP3min) test. Nine college-aged subjects performed a maximal incremental test to determine the peak oxygen consumption rate and the gas exchange threshold. On separate days, each subject completed 4 randomly ordered constant power output rides to exhaustion to estimate CP and AWC from 5 regression models (2 linear, 2 nonlinear, and 1 exponential). During the final visit, CP and AWC were estimated from the CP3min test. The nonlinear 3-parameter (Nonlinear-3) model produced the lowest estimate of CP. The exponential (EXP) model and the CP3min test were not statistically different and produced the highest estimates of CP. Critical power estimated from the Nonlinear-3 model was 14{\%} less than those from the EXP model and the CP3min test and 4-6{\%} less than those from the linear models. Furthermore, the Nonlinear-3 and nonlinear 2-parameter (Nonlinear-2) models produced significantly greater estimates of AWC than did the linear models and CP3min. The current findings suggested that the Nonlinear-3 model may provide estimates of CP and AWC that more accurately reflect the asymptote of the power output vs. time relationship, the demarcation of the heavy and severe exercise intensity domains, and anaerobic capabilities than will the linear models and CP3min test.",
keywords = "Aerobic exercise, Anaerobic exercise, Exercise testing, Fatigue thresholds, Theoretical model",
author = "Bergstrom, {Haley C.} and Housh, {Terry J.} and Zuniga, {Jorge M.} and Traylor, {Daniel A.} and Lewis, {Robert W.} and Camic, {Clayton L.} and Schmidt, {Richard J.} and Johnson, {Glen O.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829b576d",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "592--600",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences among estimates of critical power and anaerobic work capacity derived from five mathematical models and the three-minute all-out test

AU - Bergstrom, Haley C.

AU - Housh, Terry J.

AU - Zuniga, Jorge M.

AU - Traylor, Daniel A.

AU - Lewis, Robert W.

AU - Camic, Clayton L.

AU - Schmidt, Richard J.

AU - Johnson, Glen O.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Bergstrom, HC, Housh, TJ, Zuniga, JM, Traylor, DA, Lewis, RW Jr, Camic, CL, Schmidt, RJ, and Johnson, GO. Differences among estimates of critical power and anaerobic work capacity derived from five mathematical models and the three-minute all-out test. J Strength Cond Res 28(3): 592-600, 2014- Estimates of critical power (CP) and anaerobic work capacity (AWC) from the power output vs. time relationship have been derived from various mathematical models. The purpose of this study was to examine estimates of CP and AWC from the multiple work bout, 2- and 3-parameter models, and those from the 3-minute all-out CP (CP3min) test. Nine college-aged subjects performed a maximal incremental test to determine the peak oxygen consumption rate and the gas exchange threshold. On separate days, each subject completed 4 randomly ordered constant power output rides to exhaustion to estimate CP and AWC from 5 regression models (2 linear, 2 nonlinear, and 1 exponential). During the final visit, CP and AWC were estimated from the CP3min test. The nonlinear 3-parameter (Nonlinear-3) model produced the lowest estimate of CP. The exponential (EXP) model and the CP3min test were not statistically different and produced the highest estimates of CP. Critical power estimated from the Nonlinear-3 model was 14% less than those from the EXP model and the CP3min test and 4-6% less than those from the linear models. Furthermore, the Nonlinear-3 and nonlinear 2-parameter (Nonlinear-2) models produced significantly greater estimates of AWC than did the linear models and CP3min. The current findings suggested that the Nonlinear-3 model may provide estimates of CP and AWC that more accurately reflect the asymptote of the power output vs. time relationship, the demarcation of the heavy and severe exercise intensity domains, and anaerobic capabilities than will the linear models and CP3min test.

AB - Bergstrom, HC, Housh, TJ, Zuniga, JM, Traylor, DA, Lewis, RW Jr, Camic, CL, Schmidt, RJ, and Johnson, GO. Differences among estimates of critical power and anaerobic work capacity derived from five mathematical models and the three-minute all-out test. J Strength Cond Res 28(3): 592-600, 2014- Estimates of critical power (CP) and anaerobic work capacity (AWC) from the power output vs. time relationship have been derived from various mathematical models. The purpose of this study was to examine estimates of CP and AWC from the multiple work bout, 2- and 3-parameter models, and those from the 3-minute all-out CP (CP3min) test. Nine college-aged subjects performed a maximal incremental test to determine the peak oxygen consumption rate and the gas exchange threshold. On separate days, each subject completed 4 randomly ordered constant power output rides to exhaustion to estimate CP and AWC from 5 regression models (2 linear, 2 nonlinear, and 1 exponential). During the final visit, CP and AWC were estimated from the CP3min test. The nonlinear 3-parameter (Nonlinear-3) model produced the lowest estimate of CP. The exponential (EXP) model and the CP3min test were not statistically different and produced the highest estimates of CP. Critical power estimated from the Nonlinear-3 model was 14% less than those from the EXP model and the CP3min test and 4-6% less than those from the linear models. Furthermore, the Nonlinear-3 and nonlinear 2-parameter (Nonlinear-2) models produced significantly greater estimates of AWC than did the linear models and CP3min. The current findings suggested that the Nonlinear-3 model may provide estimates of CP and AWC that more accurately reflect the asymptote of the power output vs. time relationship, the demarcation of the heavy and severe exercise intensity domains, and anaerobic capabilities than will the linear models and CP3min test.

KW - Aerobic exercise

KW - Anaerobic exercise

KW - Exercise testing

KW - Fatigue thresholds

KW - Theoretical model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898032106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898032106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829b576d

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829b576d

M3 - Article

C2 - 24566607

AN - SCOPUS:84898032106

VL - 28

SP - 592

EP - 600

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 3

ER -