Did community greening reduce crime? Evidence from New Haven, CT, 1996–2007

Dexter H. Locke, Seunghoon Han, Michelle C. Kondo, Colleen Murphy-Dunning, Mary Cox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For some volunteers, neighborhood safety is one of the reasons for becoming involved in community greening. For example, many volunteers of the Community Greenspace program at the Urban Resources Initiative in New Haven, Connecticut believe that there is a potential reduction in crime from community greening activities, even though it is not an explicit goal of the program. These types of community-led interventions are distinct from both existing tree canopy and large-scale municipally led initiatives. These types of interventions remain understudied with respect to the potential for reducing crime. We therefore used a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DID) approach to test whether more than a decade of street tree planting (1996–2007) in New Haven had an effect on crime levels at planting sites (n = 300) compared to control sites that received no Community Greenspace-planted trees (n = 893). We examined violent, property, and misdemeanor crimes (comprised of vandalism, prostitution, and narcotics crimes) individually and jointly to test for crime-type specific effects, while controlling for sociodemographic factors and spatio-temporal trends. In general, we found a null relationship between trees planted and crime on block faces per year at the p < 0.05 level. Increases in crime were not observed on treatment sites. We discuss implications for tree inventories and monitoring, study design, and techniques to assess impacts of tree planting efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-79
Number of pages8
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume161
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

crime
greenspace
tree planting
prostitution
canopy
safety
monitoring
resource

Keywords

  • Community-based greening
  • Crime
  • Difference-in-differences
  • New Haven, CT
  • Street trees
  • Urban vegetation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Did community greening reduce crime? Evidence from New Haven, CT, 1996–2007. / Locke, Dexter H.; Han, Seunghoon; Kondo, Michelle C.; Murphy-Dunning, Colleen; Cox, Mary.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 161, 01.05.2017, p. 72-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Locke, Dexter H. ; Han, Seunghoon ; Kondo, Michelle C. ; Murphy-Dunning, Colleen ; Cox, Mary. / Did community greening reduce crime? Evidence from New Haven, CT, 1996–2007. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2017 ; Vol. 161. pp. 72-79.
@article{5c3167f6f0854004960ea531b62bffdc,
title = "Did community greening reduce crime? Evidence from New Haven, CT, 1996–2007",
abstract = "For some volunteers, neighborhood safety is one of the reasons for becoming involved in community greening. For example, many volunteers of the Community Greenspace program at the Urban Resources Initiative in New Haven, Connecticut believe that there is a potential reduction in crime from community greening activities, even though it is not an explicit goal of the program. These types of community-led interventions are distinct from both existing tree canopy and large-scale municipally led initiatives. These types of interventions remain understudied with respect to the potential for reducing crime. We therefore used a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DID) approach to test whether more than a decade of street tree planting (1996–2007) in New Haven had an effect on crime levels at planting sites (n = 300) compared to control sites that received no Community Greenspace-planted trees (n = 893). We examined violent, property, and misdemeanor crimes (comprised of vandalism, prostitution, and narcotics crimes) individually and jointly to test for crime-type specific effects, while controlling for sociodemographic factors and spatio-temporal trends. In general, we found a null relationship between trees planted and crime on block faces per year at the p < 0.05 level. Increases in crime were not observed on treatment sites. We discuss implications for tree inventories and monitoring, study design, and techniques to assess impacts of tree planting efforts.",
keywords = "Community-based greening, Crime, Difference-in-differences, New Haven, CT, Street trees, Urban vegetation",
author = "Locke, {Dexter H.} and Seunghoon Han and Kondo, {Michelle C.} and Colleen Murphy-Dunning and Mary Cox",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "161",
pages = "72--79",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Did community greening reduce crime? Evidence from New Haven, CT, 1996–2007

AU - Locke, Dexter H.

AU - Han, Seunghoon

AU - Kondo, Michelle C.

AU - Murphy-Dunning, Colleen

AU - Cox, Mary

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - For some volunteers, neighborhood safety is one of the reasons for becoming involved in community greening. For example, many volunteers of the Community Greenspace program at the Urban Resources Initiative in New Haven, Connecticut believe that there is a potential reduction in crime from community greening activities, even though it is not an explicit goal of the program. These types of community-led interventions are distinct from both existing tree canopy and large-scale municipally led initiatives. These types of interventions remain understudied with respect to the potential for reducing crime. We therefore used a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DID) approach to test whether more than a decade of street tree planting (1996–2007) in New Haven had an effect on crime levels at planting sites (n = 300) compared to control sites that received no Community Greenspace-planted trees (n = 893). We examined violent, property, and misdemeanor crimes (comprised of vandalism, prostitution, and narcotics crimes) individually and jointly to test for crime-type specific effects, while controlling for sociodemographic factors and spatio-temporal trends. In general, we found a null relationship between trees planted and crime on block faces per year at the p < 0.05 level. Increases in crime were not observed on treatment sites. We discuss implications for tree inventories and monitoring, study design, and techniques to assess impacts of tree planting efforts.

AB - For some volunteers, neighborhood safety is one of the reasons for becoming involved in community greening. For example, many volunteers of the Community Greenspace program at the Urban Resources Initiative in New Haven, Connecticut believe that there is a potential reduction in crime from community greening activities, even though it is not an explicit goal of the program. These types of community-led interventions are distinct from both existing tree canopy and large-scale municipally led initiatives. These types of interventions remain understudied with respect to the potential for reducing crime. We therefore used a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DID) approach to test whether more than a decade of street tree planting (1996–2007) in New Haven had an effect on crime levels at planting sites (n = 300) compared to control sites that received no Community Greenspace-planted trees (n = 893). We examined violent, property, and misdemeanor crimes (comprised of vandalism, prostitution, and narcotics crimes) individually and jointly to test for crime-type specific effects, while controlling for sociodemographic factors and spatio-temporal trends. In general, we found a null relationship between trees planted and crime on block faces per year at the p < 0.05 level. Increases in crime were not observed on treatment sites. We discuss implications for tree inventories and monitoring, study design, and techniques to assess impacts of tree planting efforts.

KW - Community-based greening

KW - Crime

KW - Difference-in-differences

KW - New Haven, CT

KW - Street trees

KW - Urban vegetation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013213129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013213129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.006

M3 - Article

VL - 161

SP - 72

EP - 79

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

ER -