Diagnosis and disposition are changed when board-certified emergency physicians use CT for non-traumatic abdominal pain

Aaron N Barksdale, Jeff Lee Hackman, Monica Gaddis, Matt Christopher Gratton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To determine the effect of abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan results on diagnosis and disposition of patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain who were evaluated by board-certified emergency physicians (EPs). Methods Prospective, observational study conducted at a safety-net facility with an emergency medicine residency and 65 000 annual adult visits. Patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain who underwent an abdominal CT from 3/2011 through 8/2011 were included. Decision to obtain CT was made by the EP. The computer order entry system required the EP to report the most likely diagnosis, and the management and disposition plan. After CT results, the same EP electronically again entered the most likely diagnosis and the planned management and disposition. CTs were interpreted by an attending radiologist. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests were used. Results Six hundred twenty-nine patients were entered and 547 remained after exclusions; 298 (54%) subjects had a change in diagnosis. In 6 categories, there was a statistically significant change, with non-specific abdominal pain the most common(P <.001); followed by renal colic (P <.001), appendicitis (P <.001), diverticulitis (P <.001), small bowel obstruction (P <.029), and gynecologic process (P <.001). The most common disposition plan was "admit for observation," which was reported in 262 patients and remained in only 122 post CT (47%); 301 (54%) patients whose initial plan was admission were ultimately managed otherwise. Conclusions Abdominal CT use by board certified EPs for nontraumatic abdominal pain changed diagnosis and disposition, with more sent home in lieu of admission. Diagnostic accuracy did not appear to be related to years of clinical experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1646-1650
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Abdominal Pain
Emergencies
Physicians
Renal Colic
Diverticulitis
Emergency Medicine
Appendicitis
Internship and Residency
Observational Studies
Observation
Prospective Studies
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Diagnosis and disposition are changed when board-certified emergency physicians use CT for non-traumatic abdominal pain. / Barksdale, Aaron N; Hackman, Jeff Lee; Gaddis, Monica; Gratton, Matt Christopher.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 1646-1650.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e41e1d25140842dcb365d431ad9dda01,
title = "Diagnosis and disposition are changed when board-certified emergency physicians use CT for non-traumatic abdominal pain",
abstract = "Objectives To determine the effect of abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan results on diagnosis and disposition of patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain who were evaluated by board-certified emergency physicians (EPs). Methods Prospective, observational study conducted at a safety-net facility with an emergency medicine residency and 65 000 annual adult visits. Patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain who underwent an abdominal CT from 3/2011 through 8/2011 were included. Decision to obtain CT was made by the EP. The computer order entry system required the EP to report the most likely diagnosis, and the management and disposition plan. After CT results, the same EP electronically again entered the most likely diagnosis and the planned management and disposition. CTs were interpreted by an attending radiologist. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests were used. Results Six hundred twenty-nine patients were entered and 547 remained after exclusions; 298 (54{\%}) subjects had a change in diagnosis. In 6 categories, there was a statistically significant change, with non-specific abdominal pain the most common(P <.001); followed by renal colic (P <.001), appendicitis (P <.001), diverticulitis (P <.001), small bowel obstruction (P <.029), and gynecologic process (P <.001). The most common disposition plan was {"}admit for observation,{"} which was reported in 262 patients and remained in only 122 post CT (47{\%}); 301 (54{\%}) patients whose initial plan was admission were ultimately managed otherwise. Conclusions Abdominal CT use by board certified EPs for nontraumatic abdominal pain changed diagnosis and disposition, with more sent home in lieu of admission. Diagnostic accuracy did not appear to be related to years of clinical experience.",
author = "Barksdale, {Aaron N} and Hackman, {Jeff Lee} and Monica Gaddis and Gratton, {Matt Christopher}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.082",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1646--1650",
journal = "The American journal of emergency medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis and disposition are changed when board-certified emergency physicians use CT for non-traumatic abdominal pain

AU - Barksdale, Aaron N

AU - Hackman, Jeff Lee

AU - Gaddis, Monica

AU - Gratton, Matt Christopher

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Objectives To determine the effect of abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan results on diagnosis and disposition of patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain who were evaluated by board-certified emergency physicians (EPs). Methods Prospective, observational study conducted at a safety-net facility with an emergency medicine residency and 65 000 annual adult visits. Patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain who underwent an abdominal CT from 3/2011 through 8/2011 were included. Decision to obtain CT was made by the EP. The computer order entry system required the EP to report the most likely diagnosis, and the management and disposition plan. After CT results, the same EP electronically again entered the most likely diagnosis and the planned management and disposition. CTs were interpreted by an attending radiologist. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests were used. Results Six hundred twenty-nine patients were entered and 547 remained after exclusions; 298 (54%) subjects had a change in diagnosis. In 6 categories, there was a statistically significant change, with non-specific abdominal pain the most common(P <.001); followed by renal colic (P <.001), appendicitis (P <.001), diverticulitis (P <.001), small bowel obstruction (P <.029), and gynecologic process (P <.001). The most common disposition plan was "admit for observation," which was reported in 262 patients and remained in only 122 post CT (47%); 301 (54%) patients whose initial plan was admission were ultimately managed otherwise. Conclusions Abdominal CT use by board certified EPs for nontraumatic abdominal pain changed diagnosis and disposition, with more sent home in lieu of admission. Diagnostic accuracy did not appear to be related to years of clinical experience.

AB - Objectives To determine the effect of abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan results on diagnosis and disposition of patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain who were evaluated by board-certified emergency physicians (EPs). Methods Prospective, observational study conducted at a safety-net facility with an emergency medicine residency and 65 000 annual adult visits. Patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain who underwent an abdominal CT from 3/2011 through 8/2011 were included. Decision to obtain CT was made by the EP. The computer order entry system required the EP to report the most likely diagnosis, and the management and disposition plan. After CT results, the same EP electronically again entered the most likely diagnosis and the planned management and disposition. CTs were interpreted by an attending radiologist. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests were used. Results Six hundred twenty-nine patients were entered and 547 remained after exclusions; 298 (54%) subjects had a change in diagnosis. In 6 categories, there was a statistically significant change, with non-specific abdominal pain the most common(P <.001); followed by renal colic (P <.001), appendicitis (P <.001), diverticulitis (P <.001), small bowel obstruction (P <.029), and gynecologic process (P <.001). The most common disposition plan was "admit for observation," which was reported in 262 patients and remained in only 122 post CT (47%); 301 (54%) patients whose initial plan was admission were ultimately managed otherwise. Conclusions Abdominal CT use by board certified EPs for nontraumatic abdominal pain changed diagnosis and disposition, with more sent home in lieu of admission. Diagnostic accuracy did not appear to be related to years of clinical experience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955210689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955210689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.082

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.082

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1646

EP - 1650

JO - The American journal of emergency medicine

JF - The American journal of emergency medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 11

ER -