Developmental differences in shape processing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Considerable evidence indicates that shape similarity plays a major role in object recognition, identification and categorization. However, little is known about shape processing and its development. Across four experiments, we addressed two related questions. First, what makes objects similar in shape? Second, how does the processing of shape similarity develop? We specifically asked whether children and adults determine shape similarity by using categories (e.g., straight vs. curved), as proposed by Biederman (1987), or whether they treat all shape variability uniformly, as proposed by Ullman (1998). Findings from Experiments 1 and 2 suggest that adults and 7-year-olds generally engage in a process in which they impose categories on shape variation and judge objects that fall within those categories as being similar in shape. Four-year-olds are far less likely to engage in such a process. Experiments 3 and 4 address whether 4-year-olds are more likely to treat shape similarity categorically (as older children and adults do) when the objects are given familiar names, functions, and internal properties. Naming did lead to more advanced treatment of shape similarity in some cases. Overall, these findings provide evidence of developmental differences in shape processing and suggest that knowledge of abstract properties of objects may affect the calculation of shape similarity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-56
Number of pages17
JournalCognitive Development
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Names
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Categorization
  • Object identification
  • Object recognition
  • Shape processing
  • Shape similarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Developmental differences in shape processing. / Sera, Maria D.; Millett, Katherine Gordon.

In: Cognitive Development, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 40-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{50f4e0ddb46d47c79989f97c00a23c5c,
title = "Developmental differences in shape processing",
abstract = "Considerable evidence indicates that shape similarity plays a major role in object recognition, identification and categorization. However, little is known about shape processing and its development. Across four experiments, we addressed two related questions. First, what makes objects similar in shape? Second, how does the processing of shape similarity develop? We specifically asked whether children and adults determine shape similarity by using categories (e.g., straight vs. curved), as proposed by Biederman (1987), or whether they treat all shape variability uniformly, as proposed by Ullman (1998). Findings from Experiments 1 and 2 suggest that adults and 7-year-olds generally engage in a process in which they impose categories on shape variation and judge objects that fall within those categories as being similar in shape. Four-year-olds are far less likely to engage in such a process. Experiments 3 and 4 address whether 4-year-olds are more likely to treat shape similarity categorically (as older children and adults do) when the objects are given familiar names, functions, and internal properties. Naming did lead to more advanced treatment of shape similarity in some cases. Overall, these findings provide evidence of developmental differences in shape processing and suggest that knowledge of abstract properties of objects may affect the calculation of shape similarity.",
keywords = "Categorization, Object identification, Object recognition, Shape processing, Shape similarity",
author = "Sera, {Maria D.} and Millett, {Katherine Gordon}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.07.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "40--56",
journal = "Cognitive Development",
issn = "0885-2014",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developmental differences in shape processing

AU - Sera, Maria D.

AU - Millett, Katherine Gordon

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Considerable evidence indicates that shape similarity plays a major role in object recognition, identification and categorization. However, little is known about shape processing and its development. Across four experiments, we addressed two related questions. First, what makes objects similar in shape? Second, how does the processing of shape similarity develop? We specifically asked whether children and adults determine shape similarity by using categories (e.g., straight vs. curved), as proposed by Biederman (1987), or whether they treat all shape variability uniformly, as proposed by Ullman (1998). Findings from Experiments 1 and 2 suggest that adults and 7-year-olds generally engage in a process in which they impose categories on shape variation and judge objects that fall within those categories as being similar in shape. Four-year-olds are far less likely to engage in such a process. Experiments 3 and 4 address whether 4-year-olds are more likely to treat shape similarity categorically (as older children and adults do) when the objects are given familiar names, functions, and internal properties. Naming did lead to more advanced treatment of shape similarity in some cases. Overall, these findings provide evidence of developmental differences in shape processing and suggest that knowledge of abstract properties of objects may affect the calculation of shape similarity.

AB - Considerable evidence indicates that shape similarity plays a major role in object recognition, identification and categorization. However, little is known about shape processing and its development. Across four experiments, we addressed two related questions. First, what makes objects similar in shape? Second, how does the processing of shape similarity develop? We specifically asked whether children and adults determine shape similarity by using categories (e.g., straight vs. curved), as proposed by Biederman (1987), or whether they treat all shape variability uniformly, as proposed by Ullman (1998). Findings from Experiments 1 and 2 suggest that adults and 7-year-olds generally engage in a process in which they impose categories on shape variation and judge objects that fall within those categories as being similar in shape. Four-year-olds are far less likely to engage in such a process. Experiments 3 and 4 address whether 4-year-olds are more likely to treat shape similarity categorically (as older children and adults do) when the objects are given familiar names, functions, and internal properties. Naming did lead to more advanced treatment of shape similarity in some cases. Overall, these findings provide evidence of developmental differences in shape processing and suggest that knowledge of abstract properties of objects may affect the calculation of shape similarity.

KW - Categorization

KW - Object identification

KW - Object recognition

KW - Shape processing

KW - Shape similarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951508244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951508244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.07.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79951508244

VL - 26

SP - 40

EP - 56

JO - Cognitive Development

JF - Cognitive Development

SN - 0885-2014

IS - 1

ER -