Development and content validity testing of the Cardiac Symptom Survey in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting often experience numerous symptoms after surgery. There is a need for a symptom tool for this population that is disease-specific, comprehensive, and responsive to change. Aims: The aims of this study were to describe the development and preliminary content validity testing of the Cardiac Symptom Survey (CSS), assess further content validity of the CSS through an expert panel, and assess responsiveness of the CSS to change. Methods: The original development of the CSS is described. An expert panel of four judges was used to rate the clarity of the items (content validity) and the relevance of the symptoms and items to the domain. Responsiveness to change of the CSS was assessed in a sample of 90 subjects who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Results: Percent agreement and content validity index coefficients ranged from .90 to 1.00. Repeated measures analyses of variance showed significant changes over time as hypothesized in some of the symptom evaluation and symptom response scores. Conclusion: Support is documented for both content validity and responsiveness of the CSS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-27
Number of pages11
JournalHeart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Bypass
Symptom Assessment
Surveys and Questionnaires
Analysis of Variance
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{b777e6c4ed5d4da0b7c143dd85e93166,
title = "Development and content validity testing of the Cardiac Symptom Survey in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting",
abstract = "Background: Patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting often experience numerous symptoms after surgery. There is a need for a symptom tool for this population that is disease-specific, comprehensive, and responsive to change. Aims: The aims of this study were to describe the development and preliminary content validity testing of the Cardiac Symptom Survey (CSS), assess further content validity of the CSS through an expert panel, and assess responsiveness of the CSS to change. Methods: The original development of the CSS is described. An expert panel of four judges was used to rate the clarity of the items (content validity) and the relevance of the symptoms and items to the domain. Responsiveness to change of the CSS was assessed in a sample of 90 subjects who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Results: Percent agreement and content validity index coefficients ranged from .90 to 1.00. Repeated measures analyses of variance showed significant changes over time as hypothesized in some of the symptom evaluation and symptom response scores. Conclusion: Support is documented for both content validity and responsiveness of the CSS.",
author = "Nieveen, {Janet Louise} and Zimmerman, {Lani M} and Barnason, {Susan Ann} and Yates, {Bernice C.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.12.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "17--27",
journal = "Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care",
issn = "0147-9563",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and content validity testing of the Cardiac Symptom Survey in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting

AU - Nieveen, Janet Louise

AU - Zimmerman, Lani M

AU - Barnason, Susan Ann

AU - Yates, Bernice C.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Background: Patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting often experience numerous symptoms after surgery. There is a need for a symptom tool for this population that is disease-specific, comprehensive, and responsive to change. Aims: The aims of this study were to describe the development and preliminary content validity testing of the Cardiac Symptom Survey (CSS), assess further content validity of the CSS through an expert panel, and assess responsiveness of the CSS to change. Methods: The original development of the CSS is described. An expert panel of four judges was used to rate the clarity of the items (content validity) and the relevance of the symptoms and items to the domain. Responsiveness to change of the CSS was assessed in a sample of 90 subjects who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Results: Percent agreement and content validity index coefficients ranged from .90 to 1.00. Repeated measures analyses of variance showed significant changes over time as hypothesized in some of the symptom evaluation and symptom response scores. Conclusion: Support is documented for both content validity and responsiveness of the CSS.

AB - Background: Patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting often experience numerous symptoms after surgery. There is a need for a symptom tool for this population that is disease-specific, comprehensive, and responsive to change. Aims: The aims of this study were to describe the development and preliminary content validity testing of the Cardiac Symptom Survey (CSS), assess further content validity of the CSS through an expert panel, and assess responsiveness of the CSS to change. Methods: The original development of the CSS is described. An expert panel of four judges was used to rate the clarity of the items (content validity) and the relevance of the symptoms and items to the domain. Responsiveness to change of the CSS was assessed in a sample of 90 subjects who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Results: Percent agreement and content validity index coefficients ranged from .90 to 1.00. Repeated measures analyses of variance showed significant changes over time as hypothesized in some of the symptom evaluation and symptom response scores. Conclusion: Support is documented for both content validity and responsiveness of the CSS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149011397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149011397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.12.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 18206523

AN - SCOPUS:38149011397

VL - 37

SP - 17

EP - 27

JO - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

JF - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

SN - 0147-9563

IS - 1

ER -