Developing paradoxical guidelines for communities of practice in organizations

Joeri Van Laere, Gerardus de Vreede, Henk G. Sol

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Communities of practice (CoPs) have been identified as a means to enable acquisition and sharing of tacit knowledge in organizations. CoPs complement or even replace approaches where the focus is on storing and retrieving codified knowledge in documents and systems. This paper highlights some of the problematic aspects of using CoPs as a tool to improve knowledge sharing. Theories on coordination are put forward as a theoretical frame to explain the role of CoPs in organizational functioning. Our study of CoPs in the Amsterdam Police Force shows how CoPs in organizations face several dilemmas. How can CoPs be self-directing and simultaneously contribute to organizational performance? How can they utilize the IT opportunities of contacting anybody, any time, any place and simultaneously circumvent the threats of low commitment and poor mutual understanding in virtual groups? How can members of CoPs produce shared repertoire without falling in the trap of groupthink? How can CoPs act as environments for sharing tacit as well as explicit knowledge? Coordination theory suggests how members of CoPs in organizations can deal with such competing values by making situational choices that reflect paradoxical guidelines. We discuss how police officers use such paradoxical guidelines in organizational prototyping sessions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006
Event14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006 - Goteborg, Sweden
Duration: Jun 12 2006Jun 14 2006

Conference

Conference14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006
CountrySweden
CityGoteborg
Period6/12/066/14/06

Fingerprint

Law enforcement

Keywords

  • Communities of practice
  • Competing values
  • Computer-mediated communication
  • Coordination theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems

Cite this

Van Laere, J., de Vreede, G., & Sol, H. G. (2006). Developing paradoxical guidelines for communities of practice in organizations. Paper presented at 14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006, Goteborg, Sweden.

Developing paradoxical guidelines for communities of practice in organizations. / Van Laere, Joeri; de Vreede, Gerardus; Sol, Henk G.

2006. Paper presented at 14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006, Goteborg, Sweden.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Van Laere, J, de Vreede, G & Sol, HG 2006, 'Developing paradoxical guidelines for communities of practice in organizations' Paper presented at 14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006, Goteborg, Sweden, 6/12/06 - 6/14/06, .
Van Laere J, de Vreede G, Sol HG. Developing paradoxical guidelines for communities of practice in organizations. 2006. Paper presented at 14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006, Goteborg, Sweden.
Van Laere, Joeri ; de Vreede, Gerardus ; Sol, Henk G. / Developing paradoxical guidelines for communities of practice in organizations. Paper presented at 14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006, Goteborg, Sweden.
@conference{2a3115246f684ccea7763681226be571,
title = "Developing paradoxical guidelines for communities of practice in organizations",
abstract = "Communities of practice (CoPs) have been identified as a means to enable acquisition and sharing of tacit knowledge in organizations. CoPs complement or even replace approaches where the focus is on storing and retrieving codified knowledge in documents and systems. This paper highlights some of the problematic aspects of using CoPs as a tool to improve knowledge sharing. Theories on coordination are put forward as a theoretical frame to explain the role of CoPs in organizational functioning. Our study of CoPs in the Amsterdam Police Force shows how CoPs in organizations face several dilemmas. How can CoPs be self-directing and simultaneously contribute to organizational performance? How can they utilize the IT opportunities of contacting anybody, any time, any place and simultaneously circumvent the threats of low commitment and poor mutual understanding in virtual groups? How can members of CoPs produce shared repertoire without falling in the trap of groupthink? How can CoPs act as environments for sharing tacit as well as explicit knowledge? Coordination theory suggests how members of CoPs in organizations can deal with such competing values by making situational choices that reflect paradoxical guidelines. We discuss how police officers use such paradoxical guidelines in organizational prototyping sessions.",
keywords = "Communities of practice, Competing values, Computer-mediated communication, Coordination theory",
author = "{Van Laere}, Joeri and {de Vreede}, Gerardus and Sol, {Henk G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
note = "14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006 ; Conference date: 12-06-2006 Through 14-06-2006",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Developing paradoxical guidelines for communities of practice in organizations

AU - Van Laere, Joeri

AU - de Vreede, Gerardus

AU - Sol, Henk G.

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Communities of practice (CoPs) have been identified as a means to enable acquisition and sharing of tacit knowledge in organizations. CoPs complement or even replace approaches where the focus is on storing and retrieving codified knowledge in documents and systems. This paper highlights some of the problematic aspects of using CoPs as a tool to improve knowledge sharing. Theories on coordination are put forward as a theoretical frame to explain the role of CoPs in organizational functioning. Our study of CoPs in the Amsterdam Police Force shows how CoPs in organizations face several dilemmas. How can CoPs be self-directing and simultaneously contribute to organizational performance? How can they utilize the IT opportunities of contacting anybody, any time, any place and simultaneously circumvent the threats of low commitment and poor mutual understanding in virtual groups? How can members of CoPs produce shared repertoire without falling in the trap of groupthink? How can CoPs act as environments for sharing tacit as well as explicit knowledge? Coordination theory suggests how members of CoPs in organizations can deal with such competing values by making situational choices that reflect paradoxical guidelines. We discuss how police officers use such paradoxical guidelines in organizational prototyping sessions.

AB - Communities of practice (CoPs) have been identified as a means to enable acquisition and sharing of tacit knowledge in organizations. CoPs complement or even replace approaches where the focus is on storing and retrieving codified knowledge in documents and systems. This paper highlights some of the problematic aspects of using CoPs as a tool to improve knowledge sharing. Theories on coordination are put forward as a theoretical frame to explain the role of CoPs in organizational functioning. Our study of CoPs in the Amsterdam Police Force shows how CoPs in organizations face several dilemmas. How can CoPs be self-directing and simultaneously contribute to organizational performance? How can they utilize the IT opportunities of contacting anybody, any time, any place and simultaneously circumvent the threats of low commitment and poor mutual understanding in virtual groups? How can members of CoPs produce shared repertoire without falling in the trap of groupthink? How can CoPs act as environments for sharing tacit as well as explicit knowledge? Coordination theory suggests how members of CoPs in organizations can deal with such competing values by making situational choices that reflect paradoxical guidelines. We discuss how police officers use such paradoxical guidelines in organizational prototyping sessions.

KW - Communities of practice

KW - Competing values

KW - Computer-mediated communication

KW - Coordination theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870651069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870651069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

ER -