Detection of BK polyomavirus after kidney transplantation

A comparison of urine electron microscopy with plasma polymerase chain reaction

justin D Westervelt, Barbara D. Alexander, Sylvia F. Costa, Sara E. Miller, David N. Howell, Stephen R. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection continues to be a significant source of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. The optimal screening method to detect BKV remains undetermined. In this retrospective analysis of 347 consecutive kidney transplant recipients, we compare the diagnostic and screening performance of urine electron microscopy (EM) with plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in testing for BKV, using biopsy-proved polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) as the gold standard. Sixty-nine of 347 recipients had a positive screening test for BKV infection. Twenty-nine patients underwent biopsy, and 11 were diagnosed with PVAN. Sensitivity rates of urine EM and plasma PCR were 88% and 100%, respectively. Specificity rates of urine EM and plasma PCR were 91% and 78%. There was no statistical difference in the operating characteristics of the two tests. The majority of both plasma PCR and urine EM tests were positive in the six months prior to a diagnostic biopsy confirming PVAN. In those patients who had evidence of BKV infection but did not have PVAN, the percentage of positive screening tests decreased with aggressive lowering of immunosuppression. We conclude that urine EM and plasma PCR both function well in screening for BKV infection and in the diagnosis of PVAN. There is an opportunity to detect viral replication, lower immunosuppression, and to prevent PVAN in this population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalClinical Transplantation
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

BK Virus
Polyomavirus
Polyomavirus Infections
Kidney Transplantation
Electron Microscopy
Urine
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Biopsy
Immunosuppression
Kidney
Allografts
Population

Keywords

  • BK polyomavirus
  • Diagnosis
  • Electron microscopy
  • Kidney transplant
  • Polyomavirus nephropathy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Detection of BK polyomavirus after kidney transplantation : A comparison of urine electron microscopy with plasma polymerase chain reaction. / Westervelt, justin D; Alexander, Barbara D.; Costa, Sylvia F.; Miller, Sara E.; Howell, David N.; Smith, Stephen R.

In: Clinical Transplantation, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Westervelt, justin D ; Alexander, Barbara D. ; Costa, Sylvia F. ; Miller, Sara E. ; Howell, David N. ; Smith, Stephen R. / Detection of BK polyomavirus after kidney transplantation : A comparison of urine electron microscopy with plasma polymerase chain reaction. In: Clinical Transplantation. 2013 ; Vol. 27, No. 1.
@article{3d1fc7005f7843a59ae5581ea79757b3,
title = "Detection of BK polyomavirus after kidney transplantation: A comparison of urine electron microscopy with plasma polymerase chain reaction",
abstract = "BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection continues to be a significant source of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. The optimal screening method to detect BKV remains undetermined. In this retrospective analysis of 347 consecutive kidney transplant recipients, we compare the diagnostic and screening performance of urine electron microscopy (EM) with plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in testing for BKV, using biopsy-proved polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) as the gold standard. Sixty-nine of 347 recipients had a positive screening test for BKV infection. Twenty-nine patients underwent biopsy, and 11 were diagnosed with PVAN. Sensitivity rates of urine EM and plasma PCR were 88{\%} and 100{\%}, respectively. Specificity rates of urine EM and plasma PCR were 91{\%} and 78{\%}. There was no statistical difference in the operating characteristics of the two tests. The majority of both plasma PCR and urine EM tests were positive in the six months prior to a diagnostic biopsy confirming PVAN. In those patients who had evidence of BKV infection but did not have PVAN, the percentage of positive screening tests decreased with aggressive lowering of immunosuppression. We conclude that urine EM and plasma PCR both function well in screening for BKV infection and in the diagnosis of PVAN. There is an opportunity to detect viral replication, lower immunosuppression, and to prevent PVAN in this population.",
keywords = "BK polyomavirus, Diagnosis, Electron microscopy, Kidney transplant, Polyomavirus nephropathy",
author = "Westervelt, {justin D} and Alexander, {Barbara D.} and Costa, {Sylvia F.} and Miller, {Sara E.} and Howell, {David N.} and Smith, {Stephen R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ctr.12048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
journal = "Clinical Transplantation",
issn = "0902-0063",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of BK polyomavirus after kidney transplantation

T2 - A comparison of urine electron microscopy with plasma polymerase chain reaction

AU - Westervelt, justin D

AU - Alexander, Barbara D.

AU - Costa, Sylvia F.

AU - Miller, Sara E.

AU - Howell, David N.

AU - Smith, Stephen R.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection continues to be a significant source of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. The optimal screening method to detect BKV remains undetermined. In this retrospective analysis of 347 consecutive kidney transplant recipients, we compare the diagnostic and screening performance of urine electron microscopy (EM) with plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in testing for BKV, using biopsy-proved polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) as the gold standard. Sixty-nine of 347 recipients had a positive screening test for BKV infection. Twenty-nine patients underwent biopsy, and 11 were diagnosed with PVAN. Sensitivity rates of urine EM and plasma PCR were 88% and 100%, respectively. Specificity rates of urine EM and plasma PCR were 91% and 78%. There was no statistical difference in the operating characteristics of the two tests. The majority of both plasma PCR and urine EM tests were positive in the six months prior to a diagnostic biopsy confirming PVAN. In those patients who had evidence of BKV infection but did not have PVAN, the percentage of positive screening tests decreased with aggressive lowering of immunosuppression. We conclude that urine EM and plasma PCR both function well in screening for BKV infection and in the diagnosis of PVAN. There is an opportunity to detect viral replication, lower immunosuppression, and to prevent PVAN in this population.

AB - BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection continues to be a significant source of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. The optimal screening method to detect BKV remains undetermined. In this retrospective analysis of 347 consecutive kidney transplant recipients, we compare the diagnostic and screening performance of urine electron microscopy (EM) with plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in testing for BKV, using biopsy-proved polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) as the gold standard. Sixty-nine of 347 recipients had a positive screening test for BKV infection. Twenty-nine patients underwent biopsy, and 11 were diagnosed with PVAN. Sensitivity rates of urine EM and plasma PCR were 88% and 100%, respectively. Specificity rates of urine EM and plasma PCR were 91% and 78%. There was no statistical difference in the operating characteristics of the two tests. The majority of both plasma PCR and urine EM tests were positive in the six months prior to a diagnostic biopsy confirming PVAN. In those patients who had evidence of BKV infection but did not have PVAN, the percentage of positive screening tests decreased with aggressive lowering of immunosuppression. We conclude that urine EM and plasma PCR both function well in screening for BKV infection and in the diagnosis of PVAN. There is an opportunity to detect viral replication, lower immunosuppression, and to prevent PVAN in this population.

KW - BK polyomavirus

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Electron microscopy

KW - Kidney transplant

KW - Polyomavirus nephropathy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873084341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873084341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ctr.12048

DO - 10.1111/ctr.12048

M3 - Article

VL - 27

JO - Clinical Transplantation

JF - Clinical Transplantation

SN - 0902-0063

IS - 1

ER -