Detecting Memory Impairment With a Modified Test Procedure: Manipulating Retention Interval With Centrally Presented Event Items

Robert F. Belli, Paul D. Windschitl, Thomas T. McCarthy, Steve E. Winfrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We suggest that detecting memory impairment with the modified test relies on long retention intervals that provide the necessary forgetting of event information for impairing effects of postevent misinformation to occur. We tested 288 Ss in four experiments that presented event items centrally, introduced verbal postevent items to a misled condition, and used the modified test, but differed by using either short (15 min) or long (5 to 7 days) retention intervals. As evidenced by poorer misled than control test performances, memory impairment only occurred with long retention intervals. Retrieval- and storage-based versions of memory-impairment hypotheses are assessed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)356-367
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1992

Fingerprint

event
Communication
experiment
performance
Retention (Psychology)
Impairment
Forgetting
Performance Test
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Detecting Memory Impairment With a Modified Test Procedure : Manipulating Retention Interval With Centrally Presented Event Items. / Belli, Robert F.; Windschitl, Paul D.; McCarthy, Thomas T.; Winfrey, Steve E.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 18, No. 2, 03.1992, p. 356-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8ddb8fc3dcaf46b38b04e4c74ef68d2e,
title = "Detecting Memory Impairment With a Modified Test Procedure: Manipulating Retention Interval With Centrally Presented Event Items",
abstract = "We suggest that detecting memory impairment with the modified test relies on long retention intervals that provide the necessary forgetting of event information for impairing effects of postevent misinformation to occur. We tested 288 Ss in four experiments that presented event items centrally, introduced verbal postevent items to a misled condition, and used the modified test, but differed by using either short (15 min) or long (5 to 7 days) retention intervals. As evidenced by poorer misled than control test performances, memory impairment only occurred with long retention intervals. Retrieval- and storage-based versions of memory-impairment hypotheses are assessed.",
author = "Belli, {Robert F.} and Windschitl, {Paul D.} and McCarthy, {Thomas T.} and Winfrey, {Steve E.}",
year = "1992",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.356",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "356--367",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detecting Memory Impairment With a Modified Test Procedure

T2 - Manipulating Retention Interval With Centrally Presented Event Items

AU - Belli, Robert F.

AU - Windschitl, Paul D.

AU - McCarthy, Thomas T.

AU - Winfrey, Steve E.

PY - 1992/3

Y1 - 1992/3

N2 - We suggest that detecting memory impairment with the modified test relies on long retention intervals that provide the necessary forgetting of event information for impairing effects of postevent misinformation to occur. We tested 288 Ss in four experiments that presented event items centrally, introduced verbal postevent items to a misled condition, and used the modified test, but differed by using either short (15 min) or long (5 to 7 days) retention intervals. As evidenced by poorer misled than control test performances, memory impairment only occurred with long retention intervals. Retrieval- and storage-based versions of memory-impairment hypotheses are assessed.

AB - We suggest that detecting memory impairment with the modified test relies on long retention intervals that provide the necessary forgetting of event information for impairing effects of postevent misinformation to occur. We tested 288 Ss in four experiments that presented event items centrally, introduced verbal postevent items to a misled condition, and used the modified test, but differed by using either short (15 min) or long (5 to 7 days) retention intervals. As evidenced by poorer misled than control test performances, memory impairment only occurred with long retention intervals. Retrieval- and storage-based versions of memory-impairment hypotheses are assessed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001554652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001554652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.356

DO - 10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.356

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001554652

VL - 18

SP - 356

EP - 367

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 2

ER -