Deficits in the pitch sensitivity of cochlear-implanted children speaking English or Mandarin

Mickael L D Deroche, Hui Ping Lu, Charles J. Limb, Yung Song Lin, Monita Chatterjee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sensitivity to complex pitch is notoriously poor in adults with cochlear implants (CIs), but it is unclear whether this is true for children with CIs. Many are implanted today at a very young age, and factors related to brain plasticity (age at implantation, duration of CI experience, and speaking a tonal language) might have strong influences on pitch sensitivity. School-aged children participated, speaking English or Mandarin, having normal hearing (NH) or wearing a CI, using their clinically assigned settings with envelope-based coding strategies. Percent correct was measured in three-interval three-alternative forced choice tasks, for the discrimination of fundamental frequency (F0) of broadband harmonic complexes, and for the discrimination of sinusoidal amplitude modulation rate (AMR) of broadband noise, with reference frequencies at 100 and 200 Hz to focus on voice pitch processing. Data were fitted using a maximum-likelihood technique. CI children displayed higher thresholds and shallower slopes than NH children in F0 discrimination, regardless of linguistic background. Thresholds and slopes were more similar between NH and CI children in AMR discrimination. Once the effect of chronological age was extracted from the variance, the aforementioned factors related to brain plasticity did not contribute significantly to the CI children's sensitivity to pitch. Unless different strategies attempt to encode fine structure information, potential benefits of plasticity may be missed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number00282
JournalFrontiers in Neuroscience
Volume8
Issue numberSEP
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Cochlea
Hearing
Age Factors
Brain
Linguistics
Noise
Language

Keywords

  • Auditory development
  • Cochlear implants
  • Pitch
  • Plasticity
  • Tonal language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Deficits in the pitch sensitivity of cochlear-implanted children speaking English or Mandarin. / Deroche, Mickael L D; Lu, Hui Ping; Limb, Charles J.; Lin, Yung Song; Chatterjee, Monita.

In: Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 8, No. SEP, 00282, 01.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deroche, Mickael L D ; Lu, Hui Ping ; Limb, Charles J. ; Lin, Yung Song ; Chatterjee, Monita. / Deficits in the pitch sensitivity of cochlear-implanted children speaking English or Mandarin. In: Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2014 ; Vol. 8, No. SEP.
@article{0a23c03b847642a387d8d1458af536f5,
title = "Deficits in the pitch sensitivity of cochlear-implanted children speaking English or Mandarin",
abstract = "Sensitivity to complex pitch is notoriously poor in adults with cochlear implants (CIs), but it is unclear whether this is true for children with CIs. Many are implanted today at a very young age, and factors related to brain plasticity (age at implantation, duration of CI experience, and speaking a tonal language) might have strong influences on pitch sensitivity. School-aged children participated, speaking English or Mandarin, having normal hearing (NH) or wearing a CI, using their clinically assigned settings with envelope-based coding strategies. Percent correct was measured in three-interval three-alternative forced choice tasks, for the discrimination of fundamental frequency (F0) of broadband harmonic complexes, and for the discrimination of sinusoidal amplitude modulation rate (AMR) of broadband noise, with reference frequencies at 100 and 200 Hz to focus on voice pitch processing. Data were fitted using a maximum-likelihood technique. CI children displayed higher thresholds and shallower slopes than NH children in F0 discrimination, regardless of linguistic background. Thresholds and slopes were more similar between NH and CI children in AMR discrimination. Once the effect of chronological age was extracted from the variance, the aforementioned factors related to brain plasticity did not contribute significantly to the CI children's sensitivity to pitch. Unless different strategies attempt to encode fine structure information, potential benefits of plasticity may be missed.",
keywords = "Auditory development, Cochlear implants, Pitch, Plasticity, Tonal language",
author = "Deroche, {Mickael L D} and Lu, {Hui Ping} and Limb, {Charles J.} and Lin, {Yung Song} and Monita Chatterjee",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fnins.2014.00282",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-4548",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "SEP",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deficits in the pitch sensitivity of cochlear-implanted children speaking English or Mandarin

AU - Deroche, Mickael L D

AU - Lu, Hui Ping

AU - Limb, Charles J.

AU - Lin, Yung Song

AU - Chatterjee, Monita

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Sensitivity to complex pitch is notoriously poor in adults with cochlear implants (CIs), but it is unclear whether this is true for children with CIs. Many are implanted today at a very young age, and factors related to brain plasticity (age at implantation, duration of CI experience, and speaking a tonal language) might have strong influences on pitch sensitivity. School-aged children participated, speaking English or Mandarin, having normal hearing (NH) or wearing a CI, using their clinically assigned settings with envelope-based coding strategies. Percent correct was measured in three-interval three-alternative forced choice tasks, for the discrimination of fundamental frequency (F0) of broadband harmonic complexes, and for the discrimination of sinusoidal amplitude modulation rate (AMR) of broadband noise, with reference frequencies at 100 and 200 Hz to focus on voice pitch processing. Data were fitted using a maximum-likelihood technique. CI children displayed higher thresholds and shallower slopes than NH children in F0 discrimination, regardless of linguistic background. Thresholds and slopes were more similar between NH and CI children in AMR discrimination. Once the effect of chronological age was extracted from the variance, the aforementioned factors related to brain plasticity did not contribute significantly to the CI children's sensitivity to pitch. Unless different strategies attempt to encode fine structure information, potential benefits of plasticity may be missed.

AB - Sensitivity to complex pitch is notoriously poor in adults with cochlear implants (CIs), but it is unclear whether this is true for children with CIs. Many are implanted today at a very young age, and factors related to brain plasticity (age at implantation, duration of CI experience, and speaking a tonal language) might have strong influences on pitch sensitivity. School-aged children participated, speaking English or Mandarin, having normal hearing (NH) or wearing a CI, using their clinically assigned settings with envelope-based coding strategies. Percent correct was measured in three-interval three-alternative forced choice tasks, for the discrimination of fundamental frequency (F0) of broadband harmonic complexes, and for the discrimination of sinusoidal amplitude modulation rate (AMR) of broadband noise, with reference frequencies at 100 and 200 Hz to focus on voice pitch processing. Data were fitted using a maximum-likelihood technique. CI children displayed higher thresholds and shallower slopes than NH children in F0 discrimination, regardless of linguistic background. Thresholds and slopes were more similar between NH and CI children in AMR discrimination. Once the effect of chronological age was extracted from the variance, the aforementioned factors related to brain plasticity did not contribute significantly to the CI children's sensitivity to pitch. Unless different strategies attempt to encode fine structure information, potential benefits of plasticity may be missed.

KW - Auditory development

KW - Cochlear implants

KW - Pitch

KW - Plasticity

KW - Tonal language

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907926222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907926222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2014.00282

DO - 10.3389/fnins.2014.00282

M3 - Article

C2 - 25249932

AN - SCOPUS:84907926222

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience

SN - 1662-4548

IS - SEP

M1 - 00282

ER -