Decision making after BRCA genetic testing

Laurie M. Connors, Nicoleta Voian, Yi Shi, Robin M. Lally, Stephen Edge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate women who have completed hereditary cancer risk assessment and BRCA genetic testing to determine if they considered themselves prepared to proceed with decision making regarding cancer screening and prevention options. Levels of decisional conflict were explored, as was their preference for information delivery. The prospective, descriptive survey was conducted at a breast and clinical genetics clinic at a comprehensive cancer center in the northeastern United States. Twenty-seven female participants completed the Preparation for Decision Making scale, Decisional Conflict Scale, and a demographic questionnaire. Scores were consistent with high levels of preparation for decision making and low decisional conflict. The face-to-face approach was the preferred method for information delivery. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a difference in the measured objectives based on cancer status but not based on BRCA status. The current information delivery approach is meeting the decision-making needs of women considered to be at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E58-E63
JournalClinical journal of oncology nursing
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Genetic Testing
Decision Making
Neoplasms
New England
Early Detection of Cancer
Ovarian Neoplasms
Breast
Demography
Breast Neoplasms
Conflict (Psychology)
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Cancer program development/evaluation
  • Communication
  • Genetics/genomics
  • Gynecologic malignancies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Decision making after BRCA genetic testing. / Connors, Laurie M.; Voian, Nicoleta; Shi, Yi; Lally, Robin M.; Edge, Stephen.

In: Clinical journal of oncology nursing, Vol. 18, No. 3, 06.2014, p. E58-E63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Connors, Laurie M. ; Voian, Nicoleta ; Shi, Yi ; Lally, Robin M. ; Edge, Stephen. / Decision making after BRCA genetic testing. In: Clinical journal of oncology nursing. 2014 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. E58-E63.
@article{425f15d59fd74987b1d2162039de2ea0,
title = "Decision making after BRCA genetic testing",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate women who have completed hereditary cancer risk assessment and BRCA genetic testing to determine if they considered themselves prepared to proceed with decision making regarding cancer screening and prevention options. Levels of decisional conflict were explored, as was their preference for information delivery. The prospective, descriptive survey was conducted at a breast and clinical genetics clinic at a comprehensive cancer center in the northeastern United States. Twenty-seven female participants completed the Preparation for Decision Making scale, Decisional Conflict Scale, and a demographic questionnaire. Scores were consistent with high levels of preparation for decision making and low decisional conflict. The face-to-face approach was the preferred method for information delivery. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a difference in the measured objectives based on cancer status but not based on BRCA status. The current information delivery approach is meeting the decision-making needs of women considered to be at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Cancer program development/evaluation, Communication, Genetics/genomics, Gynecologic malignancies",
author = "Connors, {Laurie M.} and Nicoleta Voian and Yi Shi and Lally, {Robin M.} and Stephen Edge",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1188/14.CJON.E58-E63",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "E58--E63",
journal = "Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing",
issn = "1092-1095",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision making after BRCA genetic testing

AU - Connors, Laurie M.

AU - Voian, Nicoleta

AU - Shi, Yi

AU - Lally, Robin M.

AU - Edge, Stephen

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate women who have completed hereditary cancer risk assessment and BRCA genetic testing to determine if they considered themselves prepared to proceed with decision making regarding cancer screening and prevention options. Levels of decisional conflict were explored, as was their preference for information delivery. The prospective, descriptive survey was conducted at a breast and clinical genetics clinic at a comprehensive cancer center in the northeastern United States. Twenty-seven female participants completed the Preparation for Decision Making scale, Decisional Conflict Scale, and a demographic questionnaire. Scores were consistent with high levels of preparation for decision making and low decisional conflict. The face-to-face approach was the preferred method for information delivery. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a difference in the measured objectives based on cancer status but not based on BRCA status. The current information delivery approach is meeting the decision-making needs of women considered to be at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate women who have completed hereditary cancer risk assessment and BRCA genetic testing to determine if they considered themselves prepared to proceed with decision making regarding cancer screening and prevention options. Levels of decisional conflict were explored, as was their preference for information delivery. The prospective, descriptive survey was conducted at a breast and clinical genetics clinic at a comprehensive cancer center in the northeastern United States. Twenty-seven female participants completed the Preparation for Decision Making scale, Decisional Conflict Scale, and a demographic questionnaire. Scores were consistent with high levels of preparation for decision making and low decisional conflict. The face-to-face approach was the preferred method for information delivery. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a difference in the measured objectives based on cancer status but not based on BRCA status. The current information delivery approach is meeting the decision-making needs of women considered to be at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Cancer program development/evaluation

KW - Communication

KW - Genetics/genomics

KW - Gynecologic malignancies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901625524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901625524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1188/14.CJON.E58-E63

DO - 10.1188/14.CJON.E58-E63

M3 - Article

C2 - 24867125

AN - SCOPUS:84901625524

VL - 18

SP - E58-E63

JO - Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing

JF - Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing

SN - 1092-1095

IS - 3

ER -