Decision-making about volitional impairment in sexually violent predators.

Cynthia Calkins Mercado, Brian H. Bornstein, Robert F. Schopp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Kansas v. Hendricks (1997) decision, in which the Supreme Court authorized post-sentence civil commitment for certain sex offenders, appeared to be constitutionally legitimized by limiting the class of offenders eligible for this special form of civil commitment to those who are "unable to control" their dangerousness. Nowhere in the available record, however, did the Court elucidate what they meant by this notion of volitional impairment. This study sought to examine factors that legal professionals (n=43), psychologists (n=40), and mock jurors (n=76) deem most relevant to a determination of sex offender volitional impairment. Participants, who were randomly assigned to a sexual predator commitment or an insanity hearing context, read a series of 16 vignettes that described a pedophilic offender and included combinations of variables hypothesized to be related to judgments of volitional impairment. Results suggested that participants, who as a group made remarkably high estimates of likelihood of future sexual violence, considered verbalization of control, history of sexual violence, and the context of the hearing as highly relevant to determinations of volitional impairment. Implications for policy and practice are explored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)587-602
Number of pages16
JournalLaw and human behavior
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

offender
Decision Making
decision making
Sex Offenses
commitment
sexual violence
Hearing
Dangerous Behavior
legal factors
psychologist
Supreme Court
Psychology
Predator
Impairment
Group
Offenders
Sexual Violence
Sex Offenders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Decision-making about volitional impairment in sexually violent predators. / Mercado, Cynthia Calkins; Bornstein, Brian H.; Schopp, Robert F.

In: Law and human behavior, Vol. 30, No. 5, 10.2006, p. 587-602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mercado, Cynthia Calkins ; Bornstein, Brian H. ; Schopp, Robert F. / Decision-making about volitional impairment in sexually violent predators. In: Law and human behavior. 2006 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 587-602.
@article{e806d62c4a4e46829c9d3be1088f55a8,
title = "Decision-making about volitional impairment in sexually violent predators.",
abstract = "The Kansas v. Hendricks (1997) decision, in which the Supreme Court authorized post-sentence civil commitment for certain sex offenders, appeared to be constitutionally legitimized by limiting the class of offenders eligible for this special form of civil commitment to those who are {"}unable to control{"} their dangerousness. Nowhere in the available record, however, did the Court elucidate what they meant by this notion of volitional impairment. This study sought to examine factors that legal professionals (n=43), psychologists (n=40), and mock jurors (n=76) deem most relevant to a determination of sex offender volitional impairment. Participants, who were randomly assigned to a sexual predator commitment or an insanity hearing context, read a series of 16 vignettes that described a pedophilic offender and included combinations of variables hypothesized to be related to judgments of volitional impairment. Results suggested that participants, who as a group made remarkably high estimates of likelihood of future sexual violence, considered verbalization of control, history of sexual violence, and the context of the hearing as highly relevant to determinations of volitional impairment. Implications for policy and practice are explored.",
author = "Mercado, {Cynthia Calkins} and Bornstein, {Brian H.} and Schopp, {Robert F.}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s10979-006-9055-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "587--602",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision-making about volitional impairment in sexually violent predators.

AU - Mercado, Cynthia Calkins

AU - Bornstein, Brian H.

AU - Schopp, Robert F.

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - The Kansas v. Hendricks (1997) decision, in which the Supreme Court authorized post-sentence civil commitment for certain sex offenders, appeared to be constitutionally legitimized by limiting the class of offenders eligible for this special form of civil commitment to those who are "unable to control" their dangerousness. Nowhere in the available record, however, did the Court elucidate what they meant by this notion of volitional impairment. This study sought to examine factors that legal professionals (n=43), psychologists (n=40), and mock jurors (n=76) deem most relevant to a determination of sex offender volitional impairment. Participants, who were randomly assigned to a sexual predator commitment or an insanity hearing context, read a series of 16 vignettes that described a pedophilic offender and included combinations of variables hypothesized to be related to judgments of volitional impairment. Results suggested that participants, who as a group made remarkably high estimates of likelihood of future sexual violence, considered verbalization of control, history of sexual violence, and the context of the hearing as highly relevant to determinations of volitional impairment. Implications for policy and practice are explored.

AB - The Kansas v. Hendricks (1997) decision, in which the Supreme Court authorized post-sentence civil commitment for certain sex offenders, appeared to be constitutionally legitimized by limiting the class of offenders eligible for this special form of civil commitment to those who are "unable to control" their dangerousness. Nowhere in the available record, however, did the Court elucidate what they meant by this notion of volitional impairment. This study sought to examine factors that legal professionals (n=43), psychologists (n=40), and mock jurors (n=76) deem most relevant to a determination of sex offender volitional impairment. Participants, who were randomly assigned to a sexual predator commitment or an insanity hearing context, read a series of 16 vignettes that described a pedophilic offender and included combinations of variables hypothesized to be related to judgments of volitional impairment. Results suggested that participants, who as a group made remarkably high estimates of likelihood of future sexual violence, considered verbalization of control, history of sexual violence, and the context of the hearing as highly relevant to determinations of volitional impairment. Implications for policy and practice are explored.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39049185252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39049185252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10979-006-9055-7

DO - 10.1007/s10979-006-9055-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 16951926

AN - SCOPUS:39049185252

VL - 30

SP - 587

EP - 602

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 5

ER -