Deception in cosmetics advertising: Examining cosmetics advertising claims in fashion magazine ads

Jie G. Fowler, Timothy H. Reisenwitz, Les Carlson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The FDA has only focused upon the physical safety of cosmetics and has ignored the significant reasonability of advertising claims. As such, the present article is intended to examine/ascertain the extent to which cosmetics claims contain deceptive content in fashion ads. Through a content analysis, the study reported herein revealed that cosmetics claims were not evenly distributed. To that end, the preponderance of the claims appeared to be described primarily by three categories (scientific, performance and subjective). The results also showed that more cosmetics claims were classified as deceptive than were deemed as acceptable. Close examination of these trends revealed that, for instance, most superiority claims were categorized as false, whereas scientific claims tended to be classified as vague or as omitting important information. Furthermore, performance claims were likely to be viewed as vague and endorsement claims were seen to be acceptable. The study concludes with practical and public policy suggestions that need to be addressed by advertisers and the FDA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-206
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Global Fashion Marketing
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

cosmetics
Cosmetics
magazine
Marketing
performance
content analysis
public policy
examination
Deception
trend
Food and Drug Administration

Keywords

  • Content analysis
  • Cosmetics
  • Deception
  • FDA
  • Fashion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Strategy and Management
  • Marketing
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Deception in cosmetics advertising : Examining cosmetics advertising claims in fashion magazine ads. / Fowler, Jie G.; Reisenwitz, Timothy H.; Carlson, Les.

In: Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 194-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{58fdbd3671cc4495b6d6a82aa999c5b2,
title = "Deception in cosmetics advertising: Examining cosmetics advertising claims in fashion magazine ads",
abstract = "The FDA has only focused upon the physical safety of cosmetics and has ignored the significant reasonability of advertising claims. As such, the present article is intended to examine/ascertain the extent to which cosmetics claims contain deceptive content in fashion ads. Through a content analysis, the study reported herein revealed that cosmetics claims were not evenly distributed. To that end, the preponderance of the claims appeared to be described primarily by three categories (scientific, performance and subjective). The results also showed that more cosmetics claims were classified as deceptive than were deemed as acceptable. Close examination of these trends revealed that, for instance, most superiority claims were categorized as false, whereas scientific claims tended to be classified as vague or as omitting important information. Furthermore, performance claims were likely to be viewed as vague and endorsement claims were seen to be acceptable. The study concludes with practical and public policy suggestions that need to be addressed by advertisers and the FDA.",
keywords = "Content analysis, Cosmetics, Deception, FDA, Fashion",
author = "Fowler, {Jie G.} and Reisenwitz, {Timothy H.} and Les Carlson",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/20932685.2015.1032319",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "194--206",
journal = "Journal of Global Fashion Marketing",
issn = "2093-2685",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deception in cosmetics advertising

T2 - Examining cosmetics advertising claims in fashion magazine ads

AU - Fowler, Jie G.

AU - Reisenwitz, Timothy H.

AU - Carlson, Les

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The FDA has only focused upon the physical safety of cosmetics and has ignored the significant reasonability of advertising claims. As such, the present article is intended to examine/ascertain the extent to which cosmetics claims contain deceptive content in fashion ads. Through a content analysis, the study reported herein revealed that cosmetics claims were not evenly distributed. To that end, the preponderance of the claims appeared to be described primarily by three categories (scientific, performance and subjective). The results also showed that more cosmetics claims were classified as deceptive than were deemed as acceptable. Close examination of these trends revealed that, for instance, most superiority claims were categorized as false, whereas scientific claims tended to be classified as vague or as omitting important information. Furthermore, performance claims were likely to be viewed as vague and endorsement claims were seen to be acceptable. The study concludes with practical and public policy suggestions that need to be addressed by advertisers and the FDA.

AB - The FDA has only focused upon the physical safety of cosmetics and has ignored the significant reasonability of advertising claims. As such, the present article is intended to examine/ascertain the extent to which cosmetics claims contain deceptive content in fashion ads. Through a content analysis, the study reported herein revealed that cosmetics claims were not evenly distributed. To that end, the preponderance of the claims appeared to be described primarily by three categories (scientific, performance and subjective). The results also showed that more cosmetics claims were classified as deceptive than were deemed as acceptable. Close examination of these trends revealed that, for instance, most superiority claims were categorized as false, whereas scientific claims tended to be classified as vague or as omitting important information. Furthermore, performance claims were likely to be viewed as vague and endorsement claims were seen to be acceptable. The study concludes with practical and public policy suggestions that need to be addressed by advertisers and the FDA.

KW - Content analysis

KW - Cosmetics

KW - Deception

KW - FDA

KW - Fashion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983732397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983732397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/20932685.2015.1032319

DO - 10.1080/20932685.2015.1032319

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84983732397

VL - 6

SP - 194

EP - 206

JO - Journal of Global Fashion Marketing

JF - Journal of Global Fashion Marketing

SN - 2093-2685

IS - 3

ER -