Data-Based Decision Making in Reading Interventions: A Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of the Effects for Struggling Readers

Marissa J. Filderman, Jessica R. Toste, Lisa Anne Didion, Peng Peng, Nathan H. Clemens

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For students with persistent reading difficulties, research suggests one of the most effective ways to intensify interventions is to individualize instruction through use of performance data—a process known as data-based decision making (DBDM). This article reports a synthesis and meta-analysis of studies of reading interventions containing DBDM for struggling readers, as well as the characteristics and procedures that support the efficacy of these interventions. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature published between 1975 and 2017 was conducted, resulting in 15 studies of reading interventions that incorporated DBDM for struggling readers in Grades K–12. A comparison of students who received reading interventions with DBDM with those in business-as-usual (BAU) comparison groups yielded a weighted mean effect of g =.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [.01 to.46]. A subset of six studies that compared students receiving similar reading interventions with and without DBDM yielded a weighted mean effect of g =.27, 95% CI = [.07,.47]. Implications for DBDM in reading interventions for struggling readers and areas for future research are described. In particular, experimental investigation is necessary to establish DBDM as an evidence-based practice for struggling readers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-187
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Special Education
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Reading
Decision Making
decision making
Students
confidence
Confidence Intervals
student
Evidence-Based Practice
instruction
Research
performance
evidence
Group

Keywords

  • data-based decision making
  • data-based individualization
  • intensive intervention
  • reading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Data-Based Decision Making in Reading Interventions : A Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of the Effects for Struggling Readers. / Filderman, Marissa J.; Toste, Jessica R.; Didion, Lisa Anne; Peng, Peng; Clemens, Nathan H.

In: Journal of Special Education, Vol. 52, No. 3, 01.11.2018, p. 174-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Filderman, Marissa J. ; Toste, Jessica R. ; Didion, Lisa Anne ; Peng, Peng ; Clemens, Nathan H. / Data-Based Decision Making in Reading Interventions : A Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of the Effects for Struggling Readers. In: Journal of Special Education. 2018 ; Vol. 52, No. 3. pp. 174-187.
@article{6fff3b888aee40ceb6b95fdac0b27d8e,
title = "Data-Based Decision Making in Reading Interventions: A Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of the Effects for Struggling Readers",
abstract = "For students with persistent reading difficulties, research suggests one of the most effective ways to intensify interventions is to individualize instruction through use of performance data—a process known as data-based decision making (DBDM). This article reports a synthesis and meta-analysis of studies of reading interventions containing DBDM for struggling readers, as well as the characteristics and procedures that support the efficacy of these interventions. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature published between 1975 and 2017 was conducted, resulting in 15 studies of reading interventions that incorporated DBDM for struggling readers in Grades K–12. A comparison of students who received reading interventions with DBDM with those in business-as-usual (BAU) comparison groups yielded a weighted mean effect of g =.24, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) = [.01 to.46]. A subset of six studies that compared students receiving similar reading interventions with and without DBDM yielded a weighted mean effect of g =.27, 95{\%} CI = [.07,.47]. Implications for DBDM in reading interventions for struggling readers and areas for future research are described. In particular, experimental investigation is necessary to establish DBDM as an evidence-based practice for struggling readers.",
keywords = "data-based decision making, data-based individualization, intensive intervention, reading",
author = "Filderman, {Marissa J.} and Toste, {Jessica R.} and Didion, {Lisa Anne} and Peng Peng and Clemens, {Nathan H.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022466918790001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "174--187",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data-Based Decision Making in Reading Interventions

T2 - A Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of the Effects for Struggling Readers

AU - Filderman, Marissa J.

AU - Toste, Jessica R.

AU - Didion, Lisa Anne

AU - Peng, Peng

AU - Clemens, Nathan H.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - For students with persistent reading difficulties, research suggests one of the most effective ways to intensify interventions is to individualize instruction through use of performance data—a process known as data-based decision making (DBDM). This article reports a synthesis and meta-analysis of studies of reading interventions containing DBDM for struggling readers, as well as the characteristics and procedures that support the efficacy of these interventions. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature published between 1975 and 2017 was conducted, resulting in 15 studies of reading interventions that incorporated DBDM for struggling readers in Grades K–12. A comparison of students who received reading interventions with DBDM with those in business-as-usual (BAU) comparison groups yielded a weighted mean effect of g =.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [.01 to.46]. A subset of six studies that compared students receiving similar reading interventions with and without DBDM yielded a weighted mean effect of g =.27, 95% CI = [.07,.47]. Implications for DBDM in reading interventions for struggling readers and areas for future research are described. In particular, experimental investigation is necessary to establish DBDM as an evidence-based practice for struggling readers.

AB - For students with persistent reading difficulties, research suggests one of the most effective ways to intensify interventions is to individualize instruction through use of performance data—a process known as data-based decision making (DBDM). This article reports a synthesis and meta-analysis of studies of reading interventions containing DBDM for struggling readers, as well as the characteristics and procedures that support the efficacy of these interventions. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature published between 1975 and 2017 was conducted, resulting in 15 studies of reading interventions that incorporated DBDM for struggling readers in Grades K–12. A comparison of students who received reading interventions with DBDM with those in business-as-usual (BAU) comparison groups yielded a weighted mean effect of g =.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [.01 to.46]. A subset of six studies that compared students receiving similar reading interventions with and without DBDM yielded a weighted mean effect of g =.27, 95% CI = [.07,.47]. Implications for DBDM in reading interventions for struggling readers and areas for future research are described. In particular, experimental investigation is necessary to establish DBDM as an evidence-based practice for struggling readers.

KW - data-based decision making

KW - data-based individualization

KW - intensive intervention

KW - reading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052527420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052527420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022466918790001

DO - 10.1177/0022466918790001

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85052527420

VL - 52

SP - 174

EP - 187

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 3

ER -