D-dimer and calf circumference in the evaluation of outpatient deep venous thrombosis

Jason M Johanning, David P. Franklin, David D. Thomas, James R. Elmore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Duplex ultrasonography (DU) is the primary method for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) but is relatively expensive and not always readily available. Attempts to exclude the diagnosis of DVT with D-dimer or clinical criteria independently have been unsuccessful. The goal of our study was to evaluate a second-generation rapid quantitative D-dimer and simple clinical parameters for screening of outpatients for DVT. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing DU of the lower extremities for suspected DVT were prospectively evaluated. Patients undergoing lower extremity venous ultrasound scan for suspected pulmonary embolism or already on anticoagulant therapy were excluded from the study. Data were analyzed to assess the optimal combination of characteristics to include and exclude proximal DVT. Results: One hundred fifty-six outpatients met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Elevated levels of D-dimer of 0.5 ng/mL or more were noted in 21 of 22 patients diagnosed with DVT, yielding a sensitivity of 95% and negative predictive value of 99%. Subjective symptoms of swelling or pain were present in 94% of all outpatients. Asymmetric calf swelling of more than 2.0 cm was noted in 14 of 22 patients (64%) with proximal DVT compared with 22 of 134 patients (16%) without DVT (P < .003). No single clinical history variable was significant on multivariate analysis. All outpatients with proximal DVT had either leg swelling of more than 2 cm or a positive D-dimer. Conclusion: A combination of a second-generation quantitative D-dimer and calf measurement provides an easy and effective means of excluding proximal DVT when screening outpatients. Patients with calf circumference 2.0 cm or less and a negative D-dimer may undergo nonemergent DU. Patients with a positive D-dimer or asymmetrical calf swelling of more than 2.0 cm alone or in combination should undergo emergent DU.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)877-880
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2002

Fingerprint

Venous Thrombosis
Outpatients
Ultrasonography
Lower Extremity
fibrin fragment D
Pulmonary Embolism
Anticoagulants
Leg
Multivariate Analysis
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

D-dimer and calf circumference in the evaluation of outpatient deep venous thrombosis. / Johanning, Jason M; Franklin, David P.; Thomas, David D.; Elmore, James R.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 5, 01.11.2002, p. 877-880.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johanning, Jason M ; Franklin, David P. ; Thomas, David D. ; Elmore, James R. / D-dimer and calf circumference in the evaluation of outpatient deep venous thrombosis. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2002 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 877-880.
@article{35fdc5217da249d199d77feafac62a17,
title = "D-dimer and calf circumference in the evaluation of outpatient deep venous thrombosis",
abstract = "Objective: Duplex ultrasonography (DU) is the primary method for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) but is relatively expensive and not always readily available. Attempts to exclude the diagnosis of DVT with D-dimer or clinical criteria independently have been unsuccessful. The goal of our study was to evaluate a second-generation rapid quantitative D-dimer and simple clinical parameters for screening of outpatients for DVT. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing DU of the lower extremities for suspected DVT were prospectively evaluated. Patients undergoing lower extremity venous ultrasound scan for suspected pulmonary embolism or already on anticoagulant therapy were excluded from the study. Data were analyzed to assess the optimal combination of characteristics to include and exclude proximal DVT. Results: One hundred fifty-six outpatients met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Elevated levels of D-dimer of 0.5 ng/mL or more were noted in 21 of 22 patients diagnosed with DVT, yielding a sensitivity of 95{\%} and negative predictive value of 99{\%}. Subjective symptoms of swelling or pain were present in 94{\%} of all outpatients. Asymmetric calf swelling of more than 2.0 cm was noted in 14 of 22 patients (64{\%}) with proximal DVT compared with 22 of 134 patients (16{\%}) without DVT (P < .003). No single clinical history variable was significant on multivariate analysis. All outpatients with proximal DVT had either leg swelling of more than 2 cm or a positive D-dimer. Conclusion: A combination of a second-generation quantitative D-dimer and calf measurement provides an easy and effective means of excluding proximal DVT when screening outpatients. Patients with calf circumference 2.0 cm or less and a negative D-dimer may undergo nonemergent DU. Patients with a positive D-dimer or asymmetrical calf swelling of more than 2.0 cm alone or in combination should undergo emergent DU.",
author = "Johanning, {Jason M} and Franklin, {David P.} and Thomas, {David D.} and Elmore, {James R.}",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1067/mva.2002.129247",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "877--880",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - D-dimer and calf circumference in the evaluation of outpatient deep venous thrombosis

AU - Johanning, Jason M

AU - Franklin, David P.

AU - Thomas, David D.

AU - Elmore, James R.

PY - 2002/11/1

Y1 - 2002/11/1

N2 - Objective: Duplex ultrasonography (DU) is the primary method for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) but is relatively expensive and not always readily available. Attempts to exclude the diagnosis of DVT with D-dimer or clinical criteria independently have been unsuccessful. The goal of our study was to evaluate a second-generation rapid quantitative D-dimer and simple clinical parameters for screening of outpatients for DVT. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing DU of the lower extremities for suspected DVT were prospectively evaluated. Patients undergoing lower extremity venous ultrasound scan for suspected pulmonary embolism or already on anticoagulant therapy were excluded from the study. Data were analyzed to assess the optimal combination of characteristics to include and exclude proximal DVT. Results: One hundred fifty-six outpatients met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Elevated levels of D-dimer of 0.5 ng/mL or more were noted in 21 of 22 patients diagnosed with DVT, yielding a sensitivity of 95% and negative predictive value of 99%. Subjective symptoms of swelling or pain were present in 94% of all outpatients. Asymmetric calf swelling of more than 2.0 cm was noted in 14 of 22 patients (64%) with proximal DVT compared with 22 of 134 patients (16%) without DVT (P < .003). No single clinical history variable was significant on multivariate analysis. All outpatients with proximal DVT had either leg swelling of more than 2 cm or a positive D-dimer. Conclusion: A combination of a second-generation quantitative D-dimer and calf measurement provides an easy and effective means of excluding proximal DVT when screening outpatients. Patients with calf circumference 2.0 cm or less and a negative D-dimer may undergo nonemergent DU. Patients with a positive D-dimer or asymmetrical calf swelling of more than 2.0 cm alone or in combination should undergo emergent DU.

AB - Objective: Duplex ultrasonography (DU) is the primary method for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) but is relatively expensive and not always readily available. Attempts to exclude the diagnosis of DVT with D-dimer or clinical criteria independently have been unsuccessful. The goal of our study was to evaluate a second-generation rapid quantitative D-dimer and simple clinical parameters for screening of outpatients for DVT. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing DU of the lower extremities for suspected DVT were prospectively evaluated. Patients undergoing lower extremity venous ultrasound scan for suspected pulmonary embolism or already on anticoagulant therapy were excluded from the study. Data were analyzed to assess the optimal combination of characteristics to include and exclude proximal DVT. Results: One hundred fifty-six outpatients met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Elevated levels of D-dimer of 0.5 ng/mL or more were noted in 21 of 22 patients diagnosed with DVT, yielding a sensitivity of 95% and negative predictive value of 99%. Subjective symptoms of swelling or pain were present in 94% of all outpatients. Asymmetric calf swelling of more than 2.0 cm was noted in 14 of 22 patients (64%) with proximal DVT compared with 22 of 134 patients (16%) without DVT (P < .003). No single clinical history variable was significant on multivariate analysis. All outpatients with proximal DVT had either leg swelling of more than 2 cm or a positive D-dimer. Conclusion: A combination of a second-generation quantitative D-dimer and calf measurement provides an easy and effective means of excluding proximal DVT when screening outpatients. Patients with calf circumference 2.0 cm or less and a negative D-dimer may undergo nonemergent DU. Patients with a positive D-dimer or asymmetrical calf swelling of more than 2.0 cm alone or in combination should undergo emergent DU.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036845408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036845408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mva.2002.129247

DO - 10.1067/mva.2002.129247

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 877

EP - 880

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 5

ER -