Current knowledge regarding the biology of pneumoperitoneum-based surgery

Chandrakanth Are, M. A. Talamini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laparoscopy has gained wide acceptance rapidly, making it difficult for surgeons to keep abreast of the continual advances. Initially performed on healthy young patients, the perceived advantages of laparoscopy included minimal trauma, better pain control, and improved cosmesis, as compared with open procedures. The spectrum of indications widened rapidly, and soon elderly patients and ill patients with sepsis also were being approached laparoscopically. With this came the realization that the advantages of the less invasive aspects of laparoscopic surgery were accompanied by the yet unproven effects from the pathophysiology of the induced pneumoperitoneum. Although most agree regarding advantages of minimal access surgery, consensus is lacking on the consequences of the induced pneumoperitoneum. Several of the laparoscopy- related complications result from pneumoperitoneum. Therefore, the title "minimal access surgery" may be more appropriate than "minimally invasive surgery." Relative contraindications and some absolute contraindications to laparoscopic procedures have disappeared. The threshold for performing laparoscopic surgery also has been lowered for several conditions, perhaps mostly because of a novel technique's availability. This chapter elaborates on the spectrum of physiologic effects from pneumoperitoneum used during laparoscopic surgery, which result from the combined effects of pneumoperitoneum mechanics and the metabolic qualities of the gas used. Although alternative gases have been proposed, carbon dioxide remains the standard gas of choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-63
Number of pages12
JournalProblems in General Surgery
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pneumoperitoneum
Laparoscopy
Gases
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Mechanics
Carbon Dioxide
Sepsis
Consensus
Pain
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Current knowledge regarding the biology of pneumoperitoneum-based surgery. / Are, Chandrakanth; Talamini, M. A.

In: Problems in General Surgery, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 52-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5775e89c888e4aa4be9ed82c81e72629,
title = "Current knowledge regarding the biology of pneumoperitoneum-based surgery",
abstract = "Laparoscopy has gained wide acceptance rapidly, making it difficult for surgeons to keep abreast of the continual advances. Initially performed on healthy young patients, the perceived advantages of laparoscopy included minimal trauma, better pain control, and improved cosmesis, as compared with open procedures. The spectrum of indications widened rapidly, and soon elderly patients and ill patients with sepsis also were being approached laparoscopically. With this came the realization that the advantages of the less invasive aspects of laparoscopic surgery were accompanied by the yet unproven effects from the pathophysiology of the induced pneumoperitoneum. Although most agree regarding advantages of minimal access surgery, consensus is lacking on the consequences of the induced pneumoperitoneum. Several of the laparoscopy- related complications result from pneumoperitoneum. Therefore, the title {"}minimal access surgery{"} may be more appropriate than {"}minimally invasive surgery.{"} Relative contraindications and some absolute contraindications to laparoscopic procedures have disappeared. The threshold for performing laparoscopic surgery also has been lowered for several conditions, perhaps mostly because of a novel technique's availability. This chapter elaborates on the spectrum of physiologic effects from pneumoperitoneum used during laparoscopic surgery, which result from the combined effects of pneumoperitoneum mechanics and the metabolic qualities of the gas used. Although alternative gases have been proposed, carbon dioxide remains the standard gas of choice.",
author = "Chandrakanth Are and Talamini, {M. A.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00013452-200103000-00008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "52--63",
journal = "Problems in General Surgery",
issn = "0739-8328",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current knowledge regarding the biology of pneumoperitoneum-based surgery

AU - Are, Chandrakanth

AU - Talamini, M. A.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Laparoscopy has gained wide acceptance rapidly, making it difficult for surgeons to keep abreast of the continual advances. Initially performed on healthy young patients, the perceived advantages of laparoscopy included minimal trauma, better pain control, and improved cosmesis, as compared with open procedures. The spectrum of indications widened rapidly, and soon elderly patients and ill patients with sepsis also were being approached laparoscopically. With this came the realization that the advantages of the less invasive aspects of laparoscopic surgery were accompanied by the yet unproven effects from the pathophysiology of the induced pneumoperitoneum. Although most agree regarding advantages of minimal access surgery, consensus is lacking on the consequences of the induced pneumoperitoneum. Several of the laparoscopy- related complications result from pneumoperitoneum. Therefore, the title "minimal access surgery" may be more appropriate than "minimally invasive surgery." Relative contraindications and some absolute contraindications to laparoscopic procedures have disappeared. The threshold for performing laparoscopic surgery also has been lowered for several conditions, perhaps mostly because of a novel technique's availability. This chapter elaborates on the spectrum of physiologic effects from pneumoperitoneum used during laparoscopic surgery, which result from the combined effects of pneumoperitoneum mechanics and the metabolic qualities of the gas used. Although alternative gases have been proposed, carbon dioxide remains the standard gas of choice.

AB - Laparoscopy has gained wide acceptance rapidly, making it difficult for surgeons to keep abreast of the continual advances. Initially performed on healthy young patients, the perceived advantages of laparoscopy included minimal trauma, better pain control, and improved cosmesis, as compared with open procedures. The spectrum of indications widened rapidly, and soon elderly patients and ill patients with sepsis also were being approached laparoscopically. With this came the realization that the advantages of the less invasive aspects of laparoscopic surgery were accompanied by the yet unproven effects from the pathophysiology of the induced pneumoperitoneum. Although most agree regarding advantages of minimal access surgery, consensus is lacking on the consequences of the induced pneumoperitoneum. Several of the laparoscopy- related complications result from pneumoperitoneum. Therefore, the title "minimal access surgery" may be more appropriate than "minimally invasive surgery." Relative contraindications and some absolute contraindications to laparoscopic procedures have disappeared. The threshold for performing laparoscopic surgery also has been lowered for several conditions, perhaps mostly because of a novel technique's availability. This chapter elaborates on the spectrum of physiologic effects from pneumoperitoneum used during laparoscopic surgery, which result from the combined effects of pneumoperitoneum mechanics and the metabolic qualities of the gas used. Although alternative gases have been proposed, carbon dioxide remains the standard gas of choice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034859741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034859741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00013452-200103000-00008

DO - 10.1097/00013452-200103000-00008

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 52

EP - 63

JO - Problems in General Surgery

JF - Problems in General Surgery

SN - 0739-8328

IS - 1

ER -