Cross-Training with Imperfect Training Schemes

Burak Büke, Ozgur Araz, John W. Fowler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cross-training workers is one of the most efficient ways of achieving flexibility in manufacturing and service systems for increasing responsiveness to demand variability. However, it is generally the case that cross-trained employees are not as productive on a specific task as employees who were originally trained for that task. Also, the productivity of the cross-trained workers depends on when they are cross-trained. In this work, we consider a two-stage model to analyze the effects of variations in productivity levels on cross-training policies. We define a new metric called achievable capacity and show that it plays a key role in determining the structure of the problem. If cross-training can be done in a consistent manner, the achievable capacity is not affected when the training is done, which implies that the cross-training decisions are independent of the opportunity cost of lost demand and are based on a trade-off between cross-training costs at different times. When the productivities of workers trained at different times differ, there is a three-way trade-off between cross-training costs at different times and the opportunity cost of lost demand due to lost achievable capacity. We analyze the effects of variability and show that if the productivity levels of workers trained at different times are consistent, the decision maker is inclined to defer the cross-training decisions as the variability of demand or productivity levels increases. However, when the productivities of workers trained at different times differ, an increase in the variability may make investing more in cross-training earlier more preferable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1216-1231
Number of pages16
JournalProduction and Operations Management
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Productivity
Costs
Personnel
Cross-training
Workers
Opportunity cost
Employees
Trade-offs

Keywords

  • cross-training
  • flexibility
  • newsvendor networks
  • productivity factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Cross-Training with Imperfect Training Schemes. / Büke, Burak; Araz, Ozgur; Fowler, John W.

In: Production and Operations Management, Vol. 25, No. 7, 01.07.2016, p. 1216-1231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Büke, Burak ; Araz, Ozgur ; Fowler, John W. / Cross-Training with Imperfect Training Schemes. In: Production and Operations Management. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 1216-1231.
@article{4c577edafd9b41a784688818b3dc2cf0,
title = "Cross-Training with Imperfect Training Schemes",
abstract = "Cross-training workers is one of the most efficient ways of achieving flexibility in manufacturing and service systems for increasing responsiveness to demand variability. However, it is generally the case that cross-trained employees are not as productive on a specific task as employees who were originally trained for that task. Also, the productivity of the cross-trained workers depends on when they are cross-trained. In this work, we consider a two-stage model to analyze the effects of variations in productivity levels on cross-training policies. We define a new metric called achievable capacity and show that it plays a key role in determining the structure of the problem. If cross-training can be done in a consistent manner, the achievable capacity is not affected when the training is done, which implies that the cross-training decisions are independent of the opportunity cost of lost demand and are based on a trade-off between cross-training costs at different times. When the productivities of workers trained at different times differ, there is a three-way trade-off between cross-training costs at different times and the opportunity cost of lost demand due to lost achievable capacity. We analyze the effects of variability and show that if the productivity levels of workers trained at different times are consistent, the decision maker is inclined to defer the cross-training decisions as the variability of demand or productivity levels increases. However, when the productivities of workers trained at different times differ, an increase in the variability may make investing more in cross-training earlier more preferable.",
keywords = "cross-training, flexibility, newsvendor networks, productivity factors",
author = "Burak B{\"u}ke and Ozgur Araz and Fowler, {John W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/poms.12543",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1216--1231",
journal = "Production and Operations Management",
issn = "1059-1478",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-Training with Imperfect Training Schemes

AU - Büke, Burak

AU - Araz, Ozgur

AU - Fowler, John W.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Cross-training workers is one of the most efficient ways of achieving flexibility in manufacturing and service systems for increasing responsiveness to demand variability. However, it is generally the case that cross-trained employees are not as productive on a specific task as employees who were originally trained for that task. Also, the productivity of the cross-trained workers depends on when they are cross-trained. In this work, we consider a two-stage model to analyze the effects of variations in productivity levels on cross-training policies. We define a new metric called achievable capacity and show that it plays a key role in determining the structure of the problem. If cross-training can be done in a consistent manner, the achievable capacity is not affected when the training is done, which implies that the cross-training decisions are independent of the opportunity cost of lost demand and are based on a trade-off between cross-training costs at different times. When the productivities of workers trained at different times differ, there is a three-way trade-off between cross-training costs at different times and the opportunity cost of lost demand due to lost achievable capacity. We analyze the effects of variability and show that if the productivity levels of workers trained at different times are consistent, the decision maker is inclined to defer the cross-training decisions as the variability of demand or productivity levels increases. However, when the productivities of workers trained at different times differ, an increase in the variability may make investing more in cross-training earlier more preferable.

AB - Cross-training workers is one of the most efficient ways of achieving flexibility in manufacturing and service systems for increasing responsiveness to demand variability. However, it is generally the case that cross-trained employees are not as productive on a specific task as employees who were originally trained for that task. Also, the productivity of the cross-trained workers depends on when they are cross-trained. In this work, we consider a two-stage model to analyze the effects of variations in productivity levels on cross-training policies. We define a new metric called achievable capacity and show that it plays a key role in determining the structure of the problem. If cross-training can be done in a consistent manner, the achievable capacity is not affected when the training is done, which implies that the cross-training decisions are independent of the opportunity cost of lost demand and are based on a trade-off between cross-training costs at different times. When the productivities of workers trained at different times differ, there is a three-way trade-off between cross-training costs at different times and the opportunity cost of lost demand due to lost achievable capacity. We analyze the effects of variability and show that if the productivity levels of workers trained at different times are consistent, the decision maker is inclined to defer the cross-training decisions as the variability of demand or productivity levels increases. However, when the productivities of workers trained at different times differ, an increase in the variability may make investing more in cross-training earlier more preferable.

KW - cross-training

KW - flexibility

KW - newsvendor networks

KW - productivity factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958279923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958279923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/poms.12543

DO - 10.1111/poms.12543

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958279923

VL - 25

SP - 1216

EP - 1231

JO - Production and Operations Management

JF - Production and Operations Management

SN - 1059-1478

IS - 7

ER -