Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Korean version of the identification functional ankle instability (IdFAI)

Jupil Ko, Adam B. Rosen, Cathleen N. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To cross-culturally adapt the Identification Functional Ankle Instability for use with Korean-speaking participants. Methods: The English version of the IdFAI was cross-culturally adapted into Korean based on the guidelines. The psychometric properties in the Korean version of the IdFAI were measured for test-retest reliability, internal consistency, criterion-related validity, discriminative validity, and measurement error 181 native Korean-speakers. Results: Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) between the English and Korean versions of the IdFAI for test–retest reliability was 0.98 (standard error of measurement = 1.41). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.89 for the Korean versions of IdFAI. The Korean versions of the IdFAI had a strong correlation with the SF-36 (rs = −0.69, p <.001) and the Korean version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (rs = −0.65, p <.001). The cutoff score of >10 was the optimal cutoff score to distinguish between the group memberships. The minimally detectable change of the Korean versions of the IdFAI score was 3.91. Conclusion: The Korean versions of the IdFAI have shown to be an excellent, reliable, and valid instrument. The Korean versions of the IdFAI can be utilized to assess the presence of Chronic Ankle Instability by researchers and clinicians working among Korean-speaking populations.Implications for rehabilitation The high recurrence rate of sprains may result into Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). The Identification of Functional Ankle Instability Tool (IdFAI) has been validated and recommended to identify patients with Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). The Korean version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability Tool (IdFAI) may be also recommend to researchers and clinicians for assessing the presence of Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI) in Korean-speaking population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3185-3190
Number of pages6
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
Volume40
Issue number26
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 18 2018

Fingerprint

Ankle
Research Personnel
Sprains and Strains
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Population
Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Korean version
  • Patient report outcome
  • reliability
  • translation
  • validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Korean version of the identification functional ankle instability (IdFAI). / Ko, Jupil; Rosen, Adam B.; Brown, Cathleen N.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 40, No. 26, 18.12.2018, p. 3185-3190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{96877ef9e8a745f195de299270a0315e,
title = "Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Korean version of the identification functional ankle instability (IdFAI)",
abstract = "Purpose: To cross-culturally adapt the Identification Functional Ankle Instability for use with Korean-speaking participants. Methods: The English version of the IdFAI was cross-culturally adapted into Korean based on the guidelines. The psychometric properties in the Korean version of the IdFAI were measured for test-retest reliability, internal consistency, criterion-related validity, discriminative validity, and measurement error 181 native Korean-speakers. Results: Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) between the English and Korean versions of the IdFAI for test–retest reliability was 0.98 (standard error of measurement = 1.41). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.89 for the Korean versions of IdFAI. The Korean versions of the IdFAI had a strong correlation with the SF-36 (rs = −0.69, p <.001) and the Korean version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (rs = −0.65, p <.001). The cutoff score of >10 was the optimal cutoff score to distinguish between the group memberships. The minimally detectable change of the Korean versions of the IdFAI score was 3.91. Conclusion: The Korean versions of the IdFAI have shown to be an excellent, reliable, and valid instrument. The Korean versions of the IdFAI can be utilized to assess the presence of Chronic Ankle Instability by researchers and clinicians working among Korean-speaking populations.Implications for rehabilitation The high recurrence rate of sprains may result into Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). The Identification of Functional Ankle Instability Tool (IdFAI) has been validated and recommended to identify patients with Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). The Korean version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability Tool (IdFAI) may be also recommend to researchers and clinicians for assessing the presence of Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI) in Korean-speaking population.",
keywords = "Korean version, Patient report outcome, reliability, translation, validity",
author = "Jupil Ko and Rosen, {Adam B.} and Brown, {Cathleen N.}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/09638288.2017.1375032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "3185--3190",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "26",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Korean version of the identification functional ankle instability (IdFAI)

AU - Ko, Jupil

AU - Rosen, Adam B.

AU - Brown, Cathleen N.

PY - 2018/12/18

Y1 - 2018/12/18

N2 - Purpose: To cross-culturally adapt the Identification Functional Ankle Instability for use with Korean-speaking participants. Methods: The English version of the IdFAI was cross-culturally adapted into Korean based on the guidelines. The psychometric properties in the Korean version of the IdFAI were measured for test-retest reliability, internal consistency, criterion-related validity, discriminative validity, and measurement error 181 native Korean-speakers. Results: Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) between the English and Korean versions of the IdFAI for test–retest reliability was 0.98 (standard error of measurement = 1.41). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.89 for the Korean versions of IdFAI. The Korean versions of the IdFAI had a strong correlation with the SF-36 (rs = −0.69, p <.001) and the Korean version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (rs = −0.65, p <.001). The cutoff score of >10 was the optimal cutoff score to distinguish between the group memberships. The minimally detectable change of the Korean versions of the IdFAI score was 3.91. Conclusion: The Korean versions of the IdFAI have shown to be an excellent, reliable, and valid instrument. The Korean versions of the IdFAI can be utilized to assess the presence of Chronic Ankle Instability by researchers and clinicians working among Korean-speaking populations.Implications for rehabilitation The high recurrence rate of sprains may result into Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). The Identification of Functional Ankle Instability Tool (IdFAI) has been validated and recommended to identify patients with Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). The Korean version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability Tool (IdFAI) may be also recommend to researchers and clinicians for assessing the presence of Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI) in Korean-speaking population.

AB - Purpose: To cross-culturally adapt the Identification Functional Ankle Instability for use with Korean-speaking participants. Methods: The English version of the IdFAI was cross-culturally adapted into Korean based on the guidelines. The psychometric properties in the Korean version of the IdFAI were measured for test-retest reliability, internal consistency, criterion-related validity, discriminative validity, and measurement error 181 native Korean-speakers. Results: Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) between the English and Korean versions of the IdFAI for test–retest reliability was 0.98 (standard error of measurement = 1.41). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.89 for the Korean versions of IdFAI. The Korean versions of the IdFAI had a strong correlation with the SF-36 (rs = −0.69, p <.001) and the Korean version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (rs = −0.65, p <.001). The cutoff score of >10 was the optimal cutoff score to distinguish between the group memberships. The minimally detectable change of the Korean versions of the IdFAI score was 3.91. Conclusion: The Korean versions of the IdFAI have shown to be an excellent, reliable, and valid instrument. The Korean versions of the IdFAI can be utilized to assess the presence of Chronic Ankle Instability by researchers and clinicians working among Korean-speaking populations.Implications for rehabilitation The high recurrence rate of sprains may result into Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). The Identification of Functional Ankle Instability Tool (IdFAI) has been validated and recommended to identify patients with Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). The Korean version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability Tool (IdFAI) may be also recommend to researchers and clinicians for assessing the presence of Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI) in Korean-speaking population.

KW - Korean version

KW - Patient report outcome

KW - reliability

KW - translation

KW - validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029424934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029424934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2017.1375032

DO - 10.1080/09638288.2017.1375032

M3 - Article

C2 - 28899201

AN - SCOPUS:85029424934

VL - 40

SP - 3185

EP - 3190

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

IS - 26

ER -