Criminal thinking patterns: Are child molesters unique?

Mary A. Hatch-Maillette, Mario J Scalora, Matthew T. Huss, Jerome V. Baumgartner

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the ability of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) to reliably differentiate between men with and without histories of child molestation crimes at a maximum-security state hospital forensic mental health unit. Results showed that as hypothesized, molesters (n = 28) were less likely than non-sex offenders (n = 35) to exhibit thinking errors captured by the Cutoff, Entitlement, and to a lesser extent, the Cognitive Indolence, Discontinuity, and Power Orientation scales of the PICTS. The findings support its use in targeting general criminal thinking errors for treatment in mixed-offender populations, as well as its use in sex offender populations to augment other sex offense cognitive distortion measures when designing treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)102-117
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Psychology
Equipment and Supplies
State Hospitals
Aptitude
Sex Offenses
Crime
Population
Mental Health
Thinking
Therapeutics
Offenders
Psychological
Power (Psychology)
History
Entitlement
Sex Offenders
Offence
Discontinuity
State Security

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Criminal thinking patterns : Are child molesters unique? / Hatch-Maillette, Mary A.; Scalora, Mario J; Huss, Matthew T.; Baumgartner, Jerome V.

In: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 102-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Hatch-Maillette, Mary A. ; Scalora, Mario J ; Huss, Matthew T. ; Baumgartner, Jerome V. / Criminal thinking patterns : Are child molesters unique?. In: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2001 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 102-117.
@article{fd113bfc9182477eb484ca123ec85c09,
title = "Criminal thinking patterns: Are child molesters unique?",
abstract = "This study examined the ability of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) to reliably differentiate between men with and without histories of child molestation crimes at a maximum-security state hospital forensic mental health unit. Results showed that as hypothesized, molesters (n = 28) were less likely than non-sex offenders (n = 35) to exhibit thinking errors captured by the Cutoff, Entitlement, and to a lesser extent, the Cognitive Indolence, Discontinuity, and Power Orientation scales of the PICTS. The findings support its use in targeting general criminal thinking errors for treatment in mixed-offender populations, as well as its use in sex offender populations to augment other sex offense cognitive distortion measures when designing treatment.",
author = "Hatch-Maillette, {Mary A.} and Scalora, {Mario J} and Huss, {Matthew T.} and Baumgartner, {Jerome V.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0306624X01451007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "102--117",
journal = "International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology",
issn = "0306-624X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criminal thinking patterns

T2 - Are child molesters unique?

AU - Hatch-Maillette, Mary A.

AU - Scalora, Mario J

AU - Huss, Matthew T.

AU - Baumgartner, Jerome V.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - This study examined the ability of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) to reliably differentiate between men with and without histories of child molestation crimes at a maximum-security state hospital forensic mental health unit. Results showed that as hypothesized, molesters (n = 28) were less likely than non-sex offenders (n = 35) to exhibit thinking errors captured by the Cutoff, Entitlement, and to a lesser extent, the Cognitive Indolence, Discontinuity, and Power Orientation scales of the PICTS. The findings support its use in targeting general criminal thinking errors for treatment in mixed-offender populations, as well as its use in sex offender populations to augment other sex offense cognitive distortion measures when designing treatment.

AB - This study examined the ability of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) to reliably differentiate between men with and without histories of child molestation crimes at a maximum-security state hospital forensic mental health unit. Results showed that as hypothesized, molesters (n = 28) were less likely than non-sex offenders (n = 35) to exhibit thinking errors captured by the Cutoff, Entitlement, and to a lesser extent, the Cognitive Indolence, Discontinuity, and Power Orientation scales of the PICTS. The findings support its use in targeting general criminal thinking errors for treatment in mixed-offender populations, as well as its use in sex offender populations to augment other sex offense cognitive distortion measures when designing treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035135469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035135469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0306624X01451007

DO - 10.1177/0306624X01451007

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0035135469

VL - 45

SP - 102

EP - 117

JO - International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

JF - International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

SN - 0306-624X

IS - 1

ER -