Crash testing and analysis of work-zone sign supports

Karla A. Polivka, Ron Faller, John R. Rohde, Dean L. Sicking

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A variety of traffic-controlling devices are used in work zones; some of these are not normally found on the roadside or in the traveled way outside of the work zones. These devices are used to enhance the safety of the work zones by controlling the traffic through these areas. Because of the placement of the traffic control devices, the devices themselves may be potentially hazardous to both workers and errant vehicles. The impact performance of many work-zone traffic control devices is mainly unknown, and to date limited crash testing has been conducted under the criteria of NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. The results of full-scale crash testing of flexible panel work-zone sign stands were evaluated and analyzed to quantify the features that successful devices shared, as well as common features of those devices that failed salient safety criteria. Parameters considered included sign base and upright properties, sign height, cross-member properties, and ancillary details. Results pointed to three problematic, fundamental design issues: (a) combinations of base and upright stiffness and strength that generally lead to significant wind-shield damage, (b) cross members that lead to windshield damage in the end-on (90°) impact orientation, and (c) appurtenances that have an impact on performance. Although there are a significant number of variables that control the performance of a given device, these generalizations offer a basis for the evaluation of the fundamental design elements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-104
Number of pages9
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number1797
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Traffic control
Testing
Windshields
Roadsides
Stiffness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Crash testing and analysis of work-zone sign supports. / Polivka, Karla A.; Faller, Ron; Rohde, John R.; Sicking, Dean L.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 1797, 01.01.2002, p. 96-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Polivka, Karla A. ; Faller, Ron ; Rohde, John R. ; Sicking, Dean L. / Crash testing and analysis of work-zone sign supports. In: Transportation Research Record. 2002 ; No. 1797. pp. 96-104.
@article{f977a0ccd09243b0a8cf26c93e0b639e,
title = "Crash testing and analysis of work-zone sign supports",
abstract = "A variety of traffic-controlling devices are used in work zones; some of these are not normally found on the roadside or in the traveled way outside of the work zones. These devices are used to enhance the safety of the work zones by controlling the traffic through these areas. Because of the placement of the traffic control devices, the devices themselves may be potentially hazardous to both workers and errant vehicles. The impact performance of many work-zone traffic control devices is mainly unknown, and to date limited crash testing has been conducted under the criteria of NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. The results of full-scale crash testing of flexible panel work-zone sign stands were evaluated and analyzed to quantify the features that successful devices shared, as well as common features of those devices that failed salient safety criteria. Parameters considered included sign base and upright properties, sign height, cross-member properties, and ancillary details. Results pointed to three problematic, fundamental design issues: (a) combinations of base and upright stiffness and strength that generally lead to significant wind-shield damage, (b) cross members that lead to windshield damage in the end-on (90°) impact orientation, and (c) appurtenances that have an impact on performance. Although there are a significant number of variables that control the performance of a given device, these generalizations offer a basis for the evaluation of the fundamental design elements.",
author = "Polivka, {Karla A.} and Ron Faller and Rohde, {John R.} and Sicking, {Dean L.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3141/1797-12",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "96--104",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "1797",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crash testing and analysis of work-zone sign supports

AU - Polivka, Karla A.

AU - Faller, Ron

AU - Rohde, John R.

AU - Sicking, Dean L.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - A variety of traffic-controlling devices are used in work zones; some of these are not normally found on the roadside or in the traveled way outside of the work zones. These devices are used to enhance the safety of the work zones by controlling the traffic through these areas. Because of the placement of the traffic control devices, the devices themselves may be potentially hazardous to both workers and errant vehicles. The impact performance of many work-zone traffic control devices is mainly unknown, and to date limited crash testing has been conducted under the criteria of NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. The results of full-scale crash testing of flexible panel work-zone sign stands were evaluated and analyzed to quantify the features that successful devices shared, as well as common features of those devices that failed salient safety criteria. Parameters considered included sign base and upright properties, sign height, cross-member properties, and ancillary details. Results pointed to three problematic, fundamental design issues: (a) combinations of base and upright stiffness and strength that generally lead to significant wind-shield damage, (b) cross members that lead to windshield damage in the end-on (90°) impact orientation, and (c) appurtenances that have an impact on performance. Although there are a significant number of variables that control the performance of a given device, these generalizations offer a basis for the evaluation of the fundamental design elements.

AB - A variety of traffic-controlling devices are used in work zones; some of these are not normally found on the roadside or in the traveled way outside of the work zones. These devices are used to enhance the safety of the work zones by controlling the traffic through these areas. Because of the placement of the traffic control devices, the devices themselves may be potentially hazardous to both workers and errant vehicles. The impact performance of many work-zone traffic control devices is mainly unknown, and to date limited crash testing has been conducted under the criteria of NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. The results of full-scale crash testing of flexible panel work-zone sign stands were evaluated and analyzed to quantify the features that successful devices shared, as well as common features of those devices that failed salient safety criteria. Parameters considered included sign base and upright properties, sign height, cross-member properties, and ancillary details. Results pointed to three problematic, fundamental design issues: (a) combinations of base and upright stiffness and strength that generally lead to significant wind-shield damage, (b) cross members that lead to windshield damage in the end-on (90°) impact orientation, and (c) appurtenances that have an impact on performance. Although there are a significant number of variables that control the performance of a given device, these generalizations offer a basis for the evaluation of the fundamental design elements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036999952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036999952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3141/1797-12

DO - 10.3141/1797-12

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036999952

SP - 96

EP - 104

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 1797

ER -