Cortical localization of external urethral sphincter activation by transcranial electrical stimulation

Siavash S. Haghighi, S. Agrawal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation (rTES) was used to activate descending output to the external urethral sphincter muscle. Methods: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from external urethral sphincter (EUS), and anterior tibial (TA) muscles following high voltage rTES in 9 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgery. Anesthesia was achieved by continuous propofollnarcotic infusion without paralytic agents. Anodal cortical stimulation was delivered at C4/C3, C2/C1, and Cz/Fz locations in each patient. Latency and amplitude of the MEP was measured and compared for each bipolar stimulation montage. Results: The mean latency was 20.24 ± 1.3 msec. for Cz/Fz; 20.19 ± 1.1 msec. for C4/C3 and 20.19 #± 1.1 msec. for C2/C1. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in latency between the three sites (F(2,15) = 0.004; p > 0.05). The mean amplitude was 3 7.14 ± 24.3 μV for Cz/Fz; 113.33 ± 100.6 μV for C4/C3; and 85 ± 73.9 μV for C2/C1. A significant difference between the amplitudes at three sites was observed (F(2,8) = 5.2; p < 0.05). The amplitude at C4/C3 was significantly greater than amplitude at Cz/Fz (t (8) = 3.08; p < 0.05), but data did not give enough evidence to believe that difference between amplitudes for site C4/C3 & C2/C1 was significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: This study shows that the intraoperative MEP monitoring of the EUS is a feasible method. Furthermore, activation of descending axonal outflow to the EUS muscle is best achieved by cortical stimulation directed from C4 to C3 or C2 to C1 points.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-348
Number of pages6
JournalElectromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume46
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 1 2006

Fingerprint

Urethra
Motor Evoked Potentials
Muscles
Skeletal Muscle
Spine
Anesthesia
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Keywords

  • Cortical localization
  • External urethral sphincter
  • Motor evoked potential
  • Transcranial electrical stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Cortical localization of external urethral sphincter activation by transcranial electrical stimulation. / Haghighi, Siavash S.; Agrawal, S.

In: Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 46, No. 6, 01.11.2006, p. 343-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7665de2b37d14150a57a85459d242641,
title = "Cortical localization of external urethral sphincter activation by transcranial electrical stimulation",
abstract = "Purpose: Repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation (rTES) was used to activate descending output to the external urethral sphincter muscle. Methods: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from external urethral sphincter (EUS), and anterior tibial (TA) muscles following high voltage rTES in 9 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgery. Anesthesia was achieved by continuous propofollnarcotic infusion without paralytic agents. Anodal cortical stimulation was delivered at C4/C3, C2/C1, and Cz/Fz locations in each patient. Latency and amplitude of the MEP was measured and compared for each bipolar stimulation montage. Results: The mean latency was 20.24 ± 1.3 msec. for Cz/Fz; 20.19 ± 1.1 msec. for C4/C3 and 20.19 #± 1.1 msec. for C2/C1. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in latency between the three sites (F(2,15) = 0.004; p > 0.05). The mean amplitude was 3 7.14 ± 24.3 μV for Cz/Fz; 113.33 ± 100.6 μV for C4/C3; and 85 ± 73.9 μV for C2/C1. A significant difference between the amplitudes at three sites was observed (F(2,8) = 5.2; p < 0.05). The amplitude at C4/C3 was significantly greater than amplitude at Cz/Fz (t (8) = 3.08; p < 0.05), but data did not give enough evidence to believe that difference between amplitudes for site C4/C3 & C2/C1 was significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: This study shows that the intraoperative MEP monitoring of the EUS is a feasible method. Furthermore, activation of descending axonal outflow to the EUS muscle is best achieved by cortical stimulation directed from C4 to C3 or C2 to C1 points.",
keywords = "Cortical localization, External urethral sphincter, Motor evoked potential, Transcranial electrical stimulation",
author = "Haghighi, {Siavash S.} and S. Agrawal",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "343--348",
journal = "Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "0301-150X",
publisher = "Editions Nauwelaerts SA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cortical localization of external urethral sphincter activation by transcranial electrical stimulation

AU - Haghighi, Siavash S.

AU - Agrawal, S.

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - Purpose: Repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation (rTES) was used to activate descending output to the external urethral sphincter muscle. Methods: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from external urethral sphincter (EUS), and anterior tibial (TA) muscles following high voltage rTES in 9 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgery. Anesthesia was achieved by continuous propofollnarcotic infusion without paralytic agents. Anodal cortical stimulation was delivered at C4/C3, C2/C1, and Cz/Fz locations in each patient. Latency and amplitude of the MEP was measured and compared for each bipolar stimulation montage. Results: The mean latency was 20.24 ± 1.3 msec. for Cz/Fz; 20.19 ± 1.1 msec. for C4/C3 and 20.19 #± 1.1 msec. for C2/C1. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in latency between the three sites (F(2,15) = 0.004; p > 0.05). The mean amplitude was 3 7.14 ± 24.3 μV for Cz/Fz; 113.33 ± 100.6 μV for C4/C3; and 85 ± 73.9 μV for C2/C1. A significant difference between the amplitudes at three sites was observed (F(2,8) = 5.2; p < 0.05). The amplitude at C4/C3 was significantly greater than amplitude at Cz/Fz (t (8) = 3.08; p < 0.05), but data did not give enough evidence to believe that difference between amplitudes for site C4/C3 & C2/C1 was significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: This study shows that the intraoperative MEP monitoring of the EUS is a feasible method. Furthermore, activation of descending axonal outflow to the EUS muscle is best achieved by cortical stimulation directed from C4 to C3 or C2 to C1 points.

AB - Purpose: Repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation (rTES) was used to activate descending output to the external urethral sphincter muscle. Methods: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from external urethral sphincter (EUS), and anterior tibial (TA) muscles following high voltage rTES in 9 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgery. Anesthesia was achieved by continuous propofollnarcotic infusion without paralytic agents. Anodal cortical stimulation was delivered at C4/C3, C2/C1, and Cz/Fz locations in each patient. Latency and amplitude of the MEP was measured and compared for each bipolar stimulation montage. Results: The mean latency was 20.24 ± 1.3 msec. for Cz/Fz; 20.19 ± 1.1 msec. for C4/C3 and 20.19 #± 1.1 msec. for C2/C1. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in latency between the three sites (F(2,15) = 0.004; p > 0.05). The mean amplitude was 3 7.14 ± 24.3 μV for Cz/Fz; 113.33 ± 100.6 μV for C4/C3; and 85 ± 73.9 μV for C2/C1. A significant difference between the amplitudes at three sites was observed (F(2,8) = 5.2; p < 0.05). The amplitude at C4/C3 was significantly greater than amplitude at Cz/Fz (t (8) = 3.08; p < 0.05), but data did not give enough evidence to believe that difference between amplitudes for site C4/C3 & C2/C1 was significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: This study shows that the intraoperative MEP monitoring of the EUS is a feasible method. Furthermore, activation of descending axonal outflow to the EUS muscle is best achieved by cortical stimulation directed from C4 to C3 or C2 to C1 points.

KW - Cortical localization

KW - External urethral sphincter

KW - Motor evoked potential

KW - Transcranial electrical stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750995550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750995550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17147076

AN - SCOPUS:33750995550

VL - 46

SP - 343

EP - 348

JO - Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 0301-150X

IS - 6

ER -