Correspondence between the results of functional analyses and brief functional analyses

Colin S. Muething, Nathan A. Call, Joanna Lomas Mevers, Amanda N. Zangrillo, Seth B. Clark, Andrea R. Reavis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to examine the correspondence between brief functional analyses and more thorough functional analyses as described in the model of functional assessment proposed by Vollmer et al.1 Methods: A panel of trained clinicians indicated the presence/absence of specific functions of problem behavior based on graphic results from brief functional analyses and functional analyses conducted with 19 participants. These conclusions were compared across assessments. Results: The functions identified by the panel based on results of brief functional analyses had low correspondence with those of the more thorough functional analysis conducted with the same participants. Conclusions: Although brief-functional analyses appear regularly in clinical practice and the literature, findings from this study suggest that results may differ from those of more thorough functional analyses. Additional study is necessary to determine the cause of discrepant results between these two methodologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)549-559
Number of pages11
JournalDevelopmental Neurorehabilitation
Volume20
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 17 2017

Fingerprint

Problem Behavior

Keywords

  • Brief functional analysis
  • functional analysis
  • functional assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Rehabilitation
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Correspondence between the results of functional analyses and brief functional analyses. / Muething, Colin S.; Call, Nathan A.; Lomas Mevers, Joanna; Zangrillo, Amanda N.; Clark, Seth B.; Reavis, Andrea R.

In: Developmental Neurorehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 8, 17.11.2017, p. 549-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Muething, Colin S. ; Call, Nathan A. ; Lomas Mevers, Joanna ; Zangrillo, Amanda N. ; Clark, Seth B. ; Reavis, Andrea R. / Correspondence between the results of functional analyses and brief functional analyses. In: Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 2017 ; Vol. 20, No. 8. pp. 549-559.
@article{9643ecb2c2854267a750eeaa309c8bd5,
title = "Correspondence between the results of functional analyses and brief functional analyses",
abstract = "Purpose: This study sought to examine the correspondence between brief functional analyses and more thorough functional analyses as described in the model of functional assessment proposed by Vollmer et al.1 Methods: A panel of trained clinicians indicated the presence/absence of specific functions of problem behavior based on graphic results from brief functional analyses and functional analyses conducted with 19 participants. These conclusions were compared across assessments. Results: The functions identified by the panel based on results of brief functional analyses had low correspondence with those of the more thorough functional analysis conducted with the same participants. Conclusions: Although brief-functional analyses appear regularly in clinical practice and the literature, findings from this study suggest that results may differ from those of more thorough functional analyses. Additional study is necessary to determine the cause of discrepant results between these two methodologies.",
keywords = "Brief functional analysis, functional analysis, functional assessment",
author = "Muething, {Colin S.} and Call, {Nathan A.} and {Lomas Mevers}, Joanna and Zangrillo, {Amanda N.} and Clark, {Seth B.} and Reavis, {Andrea R.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/17518423.2017.1338776",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "549--559",
journal = "Developmental Neurorehabilitation",
issn = "1751-8423",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correspondence between the results of functional analyses and brief functional analyses

AU - Muething, Colin S.

AU - Call, Nathan A.

AU - Lomas Mevers, Joanna

AU - Zangrillo, Amanda N.

AU - Clark, Seth B.

AU - Reavis, Andrea R.

PY - 2017/11/17

Y1 - 2017/11/17

N2 - Purpose: This study sought to examine the correspondence between brief functional analyses and more thorough functional analyses as described in the model of functional assessment proposed by Vollmer et al.1 Methods: A panel of trained clinicians indicated the presence/absence of specific functions of problem behavior based on graphic results from brief functional analyses and functional analyses conducted with 19 participants. These conclusions were compared across assessments. Results: The functions identified by the panel based on results of brief functional analyses had low correspondence with those of the more thorough functional analysis conducted with the same participants. Conclusions: Although brief-functional analyses appear regularly in clinical practice and the literature, findings from this study suggest that results may differ from those of more thorough functional analyses. Additional study is necessary to determine the cause of discrepant results between these two methodologies.

AB - Purpose: This study sought to examine the correspondence between brief functional analyses and more thorough functional analyses as described in the model of functional assessment proposed by Vollmer et al.1 Methods: A panel of trained clinicians indicated the presence/absence of specific functions of problem behavior based on graphic results from brief functional analyses and functional analyses conducted with 19 participants. These conclusions were compared across assessments. Results: The functions identified by the panel based on results of brief functional analyses had low correspondence with those of the more thorough functional analysis conducted with the same participants. Conclusions: Although brief-functional analyses appear regularly in clinical practice and the literature, findings from this study suggest that results may differ from those of more thorough functional analyses. Additional study is necessary to determine the cause of discrepant results between these two methodologies.

KW - Brief functional analysis

KW - functional analysis

KW - functional assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022226944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85022226944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17518423.2017.1338776

DO - 10.1080/17518423.2017.1338776

M3 - Article

C2 - 28692332

AN - SCOPUS:85022226944

VL - 20

SP - 549

EP - 559

JO - Developmental Neurorehabilitation

JF - Developmental Neurorehabilitation

SN - 1751-8423

IS - 8

ER -