The unit of the abscissa in Fig. 7c was reported incorrectly as m3 g1 in the published article. The correct unit should be cm3 g1 as shown in the corrected ?gure panel below (note that the ?gure caption remains unchanged): (figure presented).Moreover, on page 10329, the text "The porosity of matrix per unit mass increased from 91.3 m3 g1 to 411 m3 g1" should instead read: "The porosity of matrix per unit mass increased from 91.3 cm3 g1 to 411 cm3 g1". The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Materials Science(all)