Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes

Tukezban Huseynova, George O. Waring IV, Cynthia Roberts, Ronald R. Krueger, Minoru Tomita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate corneal biomechanical deformation response using Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and Corvis ST data. Design Prospective observational case-control study. Methods A total of 1262 eyes of 795 patients were enrolled. Three groups were established, according to the corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc): Group I (10-13 mm Hg), Group II (14-17 mm Hg), and Group III (18-21 mm Hg). Each group included 3 subgroups, based on central corneal thickness (CCT): Subgroups 1 (465-510 μm), 2 (510-555 μm), and 3 (555-600 μm). In addition, similar groups of CCT were divided into subgroups of IOPcc. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were derived from ORA. The parameters of highest concavity with the parameters of first and second applanation were recorded from Corvis ST. Results CH and CRF, applanation 1 time, and radius of curvature at highest concavity showed significant differences between CCT subgroups for each IOPcc group (P <.0001). CH, applanation 1 and 2 time, and applanation 2 velocity, as well as deformation amplitude (DA), showed significant differences by IOP subgroups for all CCT groups. IOPcc is correlated negatively with CH (r = -0.38, P <.0001). There are positive correlations of IOPcc with applanation 1 time, applanation 2 velocity, and radius and negative correlations with applanation 2 time (r = -0.54, P <.0001), applanation 1 velocity (r = -0.118, P <.0001), and DA (r = -0.362, P <.0001). Conclusion ORA and Corvis ST parameters are informative in the evaluation of corneal biomechanics. IOP is important in deformation response evaluation and must be taken into consideration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)885-893
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican journal of ophthalmology
Volume157
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Intraocular Pressure
Biomechanical Phenomena
R Factors
Case-Control Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes. / Huseynova, Tukezban; Waring IV, George O.; Roberts, Cynthia; Krueger, Ronald R.; Tomita, Minoru.

In: American journal of ophthalmology, Vol. 157, No. 4, 04.2014, p. 885-893.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f5ef930f1f9d4cea8d751d23984ae019,
title = "Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes",
abstract = "Purpose To evaluate corneal biomechanical deformation response using Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and Corvis ST data. Design Prospective observational case-control study. Methods A total of 1262 eyes of 795 patients were enrolled. Three groups were established, according to the corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc): Group I (10-13 mm Hg), Group II (14-17 mm Hg), and Group III (18-21 mm Hg). Each group included 3 subgroups, based on central corneal thickness (CCT): Subgroups 1 (465-510 μm), 2 (510-555 μm), and 3 (555-600 μm). In addition, similar groups of CCT were divided into subgroups of IOPcc. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were derived from ORA. The parameters of highest concavity with the parameters of first and second applanation were recorded from Corvis ST. Results CH and CRF, applanation 1 time, and radius of curvature at highest concavity showed significant differences between CCT subgroups for each IOPcc group (P <.0001). CH, applanation 1 and 2 time, and applanation 2 velocity, as well as deformation amplitude (DA), showed significant differences by IOP subgroups for all CCT groups. IOPcc is correlated negatively with CH (r = -0.38, P <.0001). There are positive correlations of IOPcc with applanation 1 time, applanation 2 velocity, and radius and negative correlations with applanation 2 time (r = -0.54, P <.0001), applanation 1 velocity (r = -0.118, P <.0001), and DA (r = -0.362, P <.0001). Conclusion ORA and Corvis ST parameters are informative in the evaluation of corneal biomechanics. IOP is important in deformation response evaluation and must be taken into consideration.",
author = "Tukezban Huseynova and {Waring IV}, {George O.} and Cynthia Roberts and Krueger, {Ronald R.} and Minoru Tomita",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "157",
pages = "885--893",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes

AU - Huseynova, Tukezban

AU - Waring IV, George O.

AU - Roberts, Cynthia

AU - Krueger, Ronald R.

AU - Tomita, Minoru

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - Purpose To evaluate corneal biomechanical deformation response using Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and Corvis ST data. Design Prospective observational case-control study. Methods A total of 1262 eyes of 795 patients were enrolled. Three groups were established, according to the corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc): Group I (10-13 mm Hg), Group II (14-17 mm Hg), and Group III (18-21 mm Hg). Each group included 3 subgroups, based on central corneal thickness (CCT): Subgroups 1 (465-510 μm), 2 (510-555 μm), and 3 (555-600 μm). In addition, similar groups of CCT were divided into subgroups of IOPcc. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were derived from ORA. The parameters of highest concavity with the parameters of first and second applanation were recorded from Corvis ST. Results CH and CRF, applanation 1 time, and radius of curvature at highest concavity showed significant differences between CCT subgroups for each IOPcc group (P <.0001). CH, applanation 1 and 2 time, and applanation 2 velocity, as well as deformation amplitude (DA), showed significant differences by IOP subgroups for all CCT groups. IOPcc is correlated negatively with CH (r = -0.38, P <.0001). There are positive correlations of IOPcc with applanation 1 time, applanation 2 velocity, and radius and negative correlations with applanation 2 time (r = -0.54, P <.0001), applanation 1 velocity (r = -0.118, P <.0001), and DA (r = -0.362, P <.0001). Conclusion ORA and Corvis ST parameters are informative in the evaluation of corneal biomechanics. IOP is important in deformation response evaluation and must be taken into consideration.

AB - Purpose To evaluate corneal biomechanical deformation response using Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and Corvis ST data. Design Prospective observational case-control study. Methods A total of 1262 eyes of 795 patients were enrolled. Three groups were established, according to the corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc): Group I (10-13 mm Hg), Group II (14-17 mm Hg), and Group III (18-21 mm Hg). Each group included 3 subgroups, based on central corneal thickness (CCT): Subgroups 1 (465-510 μm), 2 (510-555 μm), and 3 (555-600 μm). In addition, similar groups of CCT were divided into subgroups of IOPcc. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were derived from ORA. The parameters of highest concavity with the parameters of first and second applanation were recorded from Corvis ST. Results CH and CRF, applanation 1 time, and radius of curvature at highest concavity showed significant differences between CCT subgroups for each IOPcc group (P <.0001). CH, applanation 1 and 2 time, and applanation 2 velocity, as well as deformation amplitude (DA), showed significant differences by IOP subgroups for all CCT groups. IOPcc is correlated negatively with CH (r = -0.38, P <.0001). There are positive correlations of IOPcc with applanation 1 time, applanation 2 velocity, and radius and negative correlations with applanation 2 time (r = -0.54, P <.0001), applanation 1 velocity (r = -0.118, P <.0001), and DA (r = -0.362, P <.0001). Conclusion ORA and Corvis ST parameters are informative in the evaluation of corneal biomechanics. IOP is important in deformation response evaluation and must be taken into consideration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896067746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896067746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.024

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 24388837

AN - SCOPUS:84896067746

VL - 157

SP - 885

EP - 893

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 4

ER -