Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level

K. M. Killinger, C. R. Calkins, W. J. Umberger, D. M. Feuz, Kent M Eskridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine consumer sensory acceptance and value of beef steaks differing in marbling level (high = upper 2/3 USDA Choice and low = USDA Select), but similar in Warner-Bratzler shear value, consumers in Chicago and San Francisco (n = 124 per city) evaluated two matched pairs of high- and low-marbled strip steaks, and had the opportunity to participate in a silent, sealed-bid auction to purchase steaks from the same strip loins as the samples. Consumers who purchased steaks also evaluated the steaks when prepared in their homes. Based on overall acceptability ratings, consumers were categorized into three groups: 1) those who consistently found high marbling more acceptable, 2) those who consistently found low marbling more acceptable, and 3) those who were indifferent. Consumers who evaluated at least one high-marbled and one low-marbled sample in their home were included in an evaluation environment analysis (n = 50). High-marbled steaks were rated higher (P < 0.01) in juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability than low-marbled steaks. In Chicago, consumers tended to bid more (P < 0.10) for high-marbled steaks, whereas consumers in San Francisco did not. Consumers who found high-marbled steaks more acceptable and those who found low-marbled steaks more acceptable were willing to pay more (P < 0.01) for the more acceptable product. Consumers who evaluated high- and low-marbled samples in both the laboratory and home environments rated high- and low-marbled samples similar (P > 0.10) in flavor, juiciness, tenderness and overall acceptability when evaluating the steaks in their homes. In addition, these consumers were willing to pay similar (P > 0.10) amounts for high- and low-marbled samples in both environments. Overall, consumers found high-marbled steaks to be more acceptable than low-marbled steaks in flavor and overall acceptability when tenderness differences were minimized in the laboratory environment. Consumers were willing to pay more for their preference, whether that preference was for high-marbled or low-marbled steaks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3294-3301
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of animal science
Volume82
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1 2004

Fingerprint

steaks
marbling
United States Department of Agriculture
beef
San Francisco
USDA
loins (meat cut)
flavor
Red Meat
auctions
juiciness
sampling
shears

Keywords

  • Beef Quality
  • Consumer Panels
  • Consumer Prices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Genetics

Cite this

Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level. / Killinger, K. M.; Calkins, C. R.; Umberger, W. J.; Feuz, D. M.; Eskridge, Kent M.

In: Journal of animal science, Vol. 82, No. 11, 01.11.2004, p. 3294-3301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Killinger, K. M. ; Calkins, C. R. ; Umberger, W. J. ; Feuz, D. M. ; Eskridge, Kent M. / Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level. In: Journal of animal science. 2004 ; Vol. 82, No. 11. pp. 3294-3301.
@article{d2794d75e02247fd8857bb562eccae04,
title = "Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level",
abstract = "To determine consumer sensory acceptance and value of beef steaks differing in marbling level (high = upper 2/3 USDA Choice and low = USDA Select), but similar in Warner-Bratzler shear value, consumers in Chicago and San Francisco (n = 124 per city) evaluated two matched pairs of high- and low-marbled strip steaks, and had the opportunity to participate in a silent, sealed-bid auction to purchase steaks from the same strip loins as the samples. Consumers who purchased steaks also evaluated the steaks when prepared in their homes. Based on overall acceptability ratings, consumers were categorized into three groups: 1) those who consistently found high marbling more acceptable, 2) those who consistently found low marbling more acceptable, and 3) those who were indifferent. Consumers who evaluated at least one high-marbled and one low-marbled sample in their home were included in an evaluation environment analysis (n = 50). High-marbled steaks were rated higher (P < 0.01) in juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability than low-marbled steaks. In Chicago, consumers tended to bid more (P < 0.10) for high-marbled steaks, whereas consumers in San Francisco did not. Consumers who found high-marbled steaks more acceptable and those who found low-marbled steaks more acceptable were willing to pay more (P < 0.01) for the more acceptable product. Consumers who evaluated high- and low-marbled samples in both the laboratory and home environments rated high- and low-marbled samples similar (P > 0.10) in flavor, juiciness, tenderness and overall acceptability when evaluating the steaks in their homes. In addition, these consumers were willing to pay similar (P > 0.10) amounts for high- and low-marbled samples in both environments. Overall, consumers found high-marbled steaks to be more acceptable than low-marbled steaks in flavor and overall acceptability when tenderness differences were minimized in the laboratory environment. Consumers were willing to pay more for their preference, whether that preference was for high-marbled or low-marbled steaks.",
keywords = "Beef Quality, Consumer Panels, Consumer Prices",
author = "Killinger, {K. M.} and Calkins, {C. R.} and Umberger, {W. J.} and Feuz, {D. M.} and Eskridge, {Kent M}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "3294--3301",
journal = "Journal of Animal Science",
issn = "0021-8812",
publisher = "American Society of Animal Science",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level

AU - Killinger, K. M.

AU - Calkins, C. R.

AU - Umberger, W. J.

AU - Feuz, D. M.

AU - Eskridge, Kent M

PY - 2004/11/1

Y1 - 2004/11/1

N2 - To determine consumer sensory acceptance and value of beef steaks differing in marbling level (high = upper 2/3 USDA Choice and low = USDA Select), but similar in Warner-Bratzler shear value, consumers in Chicago and San Francisco (n = 124 per city) evaluated two matched pairs of high- and low-marbled strip steaks, and had the opportunity to participate in a silent, sealed-bid auction to purchase steaks from the same strip loins as the samples. Consumers who purchased steaks also evaluated the steaks when prepared in their homes. Based on overall acceptability ratings, consumers were categorized into three groups: 1) those who consistently found high marbling more acceptable, 2) those who consistently found low marbling more acceptable, and 3) those who were indifferent. Consumers who evaluated at least one high-marbled and one low-marbled sample in their home were included in an evaluation environment analysis (n = 50). High-marbled steaks were rated higher (P < 0.01) in juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability than low-marbled steaks. In Chicago, consumers tended to bid more (P < 0.10) for high-marbled steaks, whereas consumers in San Francisco did not. Consumers who found high-marbled steaks more acceptable and those who found low-marbled steaks more acceptable were willing to pay more (P < 0.01) for the more acceptable product. Consumers who evaluated high- and low-marbled samples in both the laboratory and home environments rated high- and low-marbled samples similar (P > 0.10) in flavor, juiciness, tenderness and overall acceptability when evaluating the steaks in their homes. In addition, these consumers were willing to pay similar (P > 0.10) amounts for high- and low-marbled samples in both environments. Overall, consumers found high-marbled steaks to be more acceptable than low-marbled steaks in flavor and overall acceptability when tenderness differences were minimized in the laboratory environment. Consumers were willing to pay more for their preference, whether that preference was for high-marbled or low-marbled steaks.

AB - To determine consumer sensory acceptance and value of beef steaks differing in marbling level (high = upper 2/3 USDA Choice and low = USDA Select), but similar in Warner-Bratzler shear value, consumers in Chicago and San Francisco (n = 124 per city) evaluated two matched pairs of high- and low-marbled strip steaks, and had the opportunity to participate in a silent, sealed-bid auction to purchase steaks from the same strip loins as the samples. Consumers who purchased steaks also evaluated the steaks when prepared in their homes. Based on overall acceptability ratings, consumers were categorized into three groups: 1) those who consistently found high marbling more acceptable, 2) those who consistently found low marbling more acceptable, and 3) those who were indifferent. Consumers who evaluated at least one high-marbled and one low-marbled sample in their home were included in an evaluation environment analysis (n = 50). High-marbled steaks were rated higher (P < 0.01) in juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability than low-marbled steaks. In Chicago, consumers tended to bid more (P < 0.10) for high-marbled steaks, whereas consumers in San Francisco did not. Consumers who found high-marbled steaks more acceptable and those who found low-marbled steaks more acceptable were willing to pay more (P < 0.01) for the more acceptable product. Consumers who evaluated high- and low-marbled samples in both the laboratory and home environments rated high- and low-marbled samples similar (P > 0.10) in flavor, juiciness, tenderness and overall acceptability when evaluating the steaks in their homes. In addition, these consumers were willing to pay similar (P > 0.10) amounts for high- and low-marbled samples in both environments. Overall, consumers found high-marbled steaks to be more acceptable than low-marbled steaks in flavor and overall acceptability when tenderness differences were minimized in the laboratory environment. Consumers were willing to pay more for their preference, whether that preference was for high-marbled or low-marbled steaks.

KW - Beef Quality

KW - Consumer Panels

KW - Consumer Prices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7244261947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7244261947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 3294

EP - 3301

JO - Journal of Animal Science

JF - Journal of Animal Science

SN - 0021-8812

IS - 11

ER -