Consistency of the counting talk test for exercise prescription

Brant D. Loose, Ann M. Christiansen, Jill E. Smolczyk, Kelsey L. Roberts, Anna Budziszewska, Crystal G. Hollatz, Joseph F. Norman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the consistency of the counting talk test (CTT) method for estimating exercise intensity across various modes of exercise in healthy young adults. Thirty-six individuals completed the study, which required participation in 3 separate sessions within a 2-week time period. During the first session, the individuals completed a maximal effort treadmill test from which each individual's heart rate reserve (HRR) was calculated. During the second and third sessions, the subjects participated in 2 modes of exercise in each session for a total of 4 different modes of exercise. The individuals exercised at 40% HRR, 50% HRR, 60% HRR, 75% HRR, and 85% HRR. The heart rate (HR), CTT, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded at each workload. Based on the individual's resting CTT (CTTrest), the % CTT for each exercise stage was then calculated. Pearson correlations demonstrated moderate to good correlations between the CTT and HRR methods and the CTT and RPE methods for estimating exercise intensity. This study found that for the individuals with CTTrest ≤25, moderate to vigorous intensity exercise as recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine HRR guidelines could be achieved by exercising at a level of 40-50% CTT rest. Individuals with a CTTrest ≥25, exercising at a level of 30-40% CTTrest would place them in the moderate to vigorous exercise intensity range. A high degree of reliability was demonstrated using the CTT method across the various modes of aerobic exercise. As such, independent of the exercise mode, the CTT was found to be an easy and consistent method for prescribing moderate to vigorous aerobic exercise intensity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1701-1707
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of strength and conditioning research
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Fingerprint

Exercise Test
Prescriptions
Exercise
Heart Rate
Workload
Young Adult
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Aerobic exercise
  • Exercise intensity
  • Exercise prescription

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Loose, B. D., Christiansen, A. M., Smolczyk, J. E., Roberts, K. L., Budziszewska, A., Hollatz, C. G., & Norman, J. F. (2012). Consistency of the counting talk test for exercise prescription. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 26(6), 1701-1707. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234e84c

Consistency of the counting talk test for exercise prescription. / Loose, Brant D.; Christiansen, Ann M.; Smolczyk, Jill E.; Roberts, Kelsey L.; Budziszewska, Anna; Hollatz, Crystal G.; Norman, Joseph F.

In: Journal of strength and conditioning research, Vol. 26, No. 6, 01.06.2012, p. 1701-1707.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Loose, BD, Christiansen, AM, Smolczyk, JE, Roberts, KL, Budziszewska, A, Hollatz, CG & Norman, JF 2012, 'Consistency of the counting talk test for exercise prescription', Journal of strength and conditioning research, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1701-1707. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234e84c
Loose BD, Christiansen AM, Smolczyk JE, Roberts KL, Budziszewska A, Hollatz CG et al. Consistency of the counting talk test for exercise prescription. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2012 Jun 1;26(6):1701-1707. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234e84c
Loose, Brant D. ; Christiansen, Ann M. ; Smolczyk, Jill E. ; Roberts, Kelsey L. ; Budziszewska, Anna ; Hollatz, Crystal G. ; Norman, Joseph F. / Consistency of the counting talk test for exercise prescription. In: Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 1701-1707.
@article{ff2d3e32cd144b3fa78d169a41ec3b38,
title = "Consistency of the counting talk test for exercise prescription",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to assess the consistency of the counting talk test (CTT) method for estimating exercise intensity across various modes of exercise in healthy young adults. Thirty-six individuals completed the study, which required participation in 3 separate sessions within a 2-week time period. During the first session, the individuals completed a maximal effort treadmill test from which each individual's heart rate reserve (HRR) was calculated. During the second and third sessions, the subjects participated in 2 modes of exercise in each session for a total of 4 different modes of exercise. The individuals exercised at 40{\%} HRR, 50{\%} HRR, 60{\%} HRR, 75{\%} HRR, and 85{\%} HRR. The heart rate (HR), CTT, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded at each workload. Based on the individual's resting CTT (CTTrest), the {\%} CTT for each exercise stage was then calculated. Pearson correlations demonstrated moderate to good correlations between the CTT and HRR methods and the CTT and RPE methods for estimating exercise intensity. This study found that for the individuals with CTTrest ≤25, moderate to vigorous intensity exercise as recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine HRR guidelines could be achieved by exercising at a level of 40-50{\%} CTT rest. Individuals with a CTTrest ≥25, exercising at a level of 30-40{\%} CTTrest would place them in the moderate to vigorous exercise intensity range. A high degree of reliability was demonstrated using the CTT method across the various modes of aerobic exercise. As such, independent of the exercise mode, the CTT was found to be an easy and consistent method for prescribing moderate to vigorous aerobic exercise intensity.",
keywords = "Aerobic exercise, Exercise intensity, Exercise prescription",
author = "Loose, {Brant D.} and Christiansen, {Ann M.} and Smolczyk, {Jill E.} and Roberts, {Kelsey L.} and Anna Budziszewska and Hollatz, {Crystal G.} and Norman, {Joseph F.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234e84c",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1701--1707",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consistency of the counting talk test for exercise prescription

AU - Loose, Brant D.

AU - Christiansen, Ann M.

AU - Smolczyk, Jill E.

AU - Roberts, Kelsey L.

AU - Budziszewska, Anna

AU - Hollatz, Crystal G.

AU - Norman, Joseph F.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to assess the consistency of the counting talk test (CTT) method for estimating exercise intensity across various modes of exercise in healthy young adults. Thirty-six individuals completed the study, which required participation in 3 separate sessions within a 2-week time period. During the first session, the individuals completed a maximal effort treadmill test from which each individual's heart rate reserve (HRR) was calculated. During the second and third sessions, the subjects participated in 2 modes of exercise in each session for a total of 4 different modes of exercise. The individuals exercised at 40% HRR, 50% HRR, 60% HRR, 75% HRR, and 85% HRR. The heart rate (HR), CTT, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded at each workload. Based on the individual's resting CTT (CTTrest), the % CTT for each exercise stage was then calculated. Pearson correlations demonstrated moderate to good correlations between the CTT and HRR methods and the CTT and RPE methods for estimating exercise intensity. This study found that for the individuals with CTTrest ≤25, moderate to vigorous intensity exercise as recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine HRR guidelines could be achieved by exercising at a level of 40-50% CTT rest. Individuals with a CTTrest ≥25, exercising at a level of 30-40% CTTrest would place them in the moderate to vigorous exercise intensity range. A high degree of reliability was demonstrated using the CTT method across the various modes of aerobic exercise. As such, independent of the exercise mode, the CTT was found to be an easy and consistent method for prescribing moderate to vigorous aerobic exercise intensity.

AB - The purpose of this study was to assess the consistency of the counting talk test (CTT) method for estimating exercise intensity across various modes of exercise in healthy young adults. Thirty-six individuals completed the study, which required participation in 3 separate sessions within a 2-week time period. During the first session, the individuals completed a maximal effort treadmill test from which each individual's heart rate reserve (HRR) was calculated. During the second and third sessions, the subjects participated in 2 modes of exercise in each session for a total of 4 different modes of exercise. The individuals exercised at 40% HRR, 50% HRR, 60% HRR, 75% HRR, and 85% HRR. The heart rate (HR), CTT, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded at each workload. Based on the individual's resting CTT (CTTrest), the % CTT for each exercise stage was then calculated. Pearson correlations demonstrated moderate to good correlations between the CTT and HRR methods and the CTT and RPE methods for estimating exercise intensity. This study found that for the individuals with CTTrest ≤25, moderate to vigorous intensity exercise as recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine HRR guidelines could be achieved by exercising at a level of 40-50% CTT rest. Individuals with a CTTrest ≥25, exercising at a level of 30-40% CTTrest would place them in the moderate to vigorous exercise intensity range. A high degree of reliability was demonstrated using the CTT method across the various modes of aerobic exercise. As such, independent of the exercise mode, the CTT was found to be an easy and consistent method for prescribing moderate to vigorous aerobic exercise intensity.

KW - Aerobic exercise

KW - Exercise intensity

KW - Exercise prescription

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863676474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863676474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234e84c

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234e84c

M3 - Article

C2 - 21904237

AN - SCOPUS:84863676474

VL - 26

SP - 1701

EP - 1707

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 6

ER -