Conflict of interest in the procurement of organs from cadavers following withdrawal of life support.

B. W. Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The University of Pittsburgh policy for procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadaver donors recognizes the potential for conflicts of interest between caring for a "hopelessly ill" patient who has forgone life-sustaining treatment and caring for a potential organ donor. The policy calls for a separation between those medical personnel who care for the gravely ill patient and those involved with the care of transplant recipients. While such a separation is possible in theory, it is difficult or impossible to attain in practice. However, such a separation of duties would be unnecessary if an arbitrator were appointed to monitor the proceedings as they take place on a case-by-case basis. In this way, the biases--real or potential--of the individuals involved could be identified, and the harmful effects of the unavoidable conflicts of interest could be minimized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-187
Number of pages9
JournalKennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Volume3
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1 1993

Fingerprint

Conflict of Interest
Tissue and Organ Procurement
conflict of interest
Cadaver
withdrawal
Tissue Donors
medical care
personnel
recipient
trend
Organs
Procurement
Therapeutics
Transplant Recipients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Conflict of interest in the procurement of organs from cadavers following withdrawal of life support. / Shaw, B. W.

In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.06.1993, p. 179-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9081c1a5a0a34805b5e203735a5fca1c,
title = "Conflict of interest in the procurement of organs from cadavers following withdrawal of life support.",
abstract = "The University of Pittsburgh policy for procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadaver donors recognizes the potential for conflicts of interest between caring for a {"}hopelessly ill{"} patient who has forgone life-sustaining treatment and caring for a potential organ donor. The policy calls for a separation between those medical personnel who care for the gravely ill patient and those involved with the care of transplant recipients. While such a separation is possible in theory, it is difficult or impossible to attain in practice. However, such a separation of duties would be unnecessary if an arbitrator were appointed to monitor the proceedings as they take place on a case-by-case basis. In this way, the biases--real or potential--of the individuals involved could be identified, and the harmful effects of the unavoidable conflicts of interest could be minimized.",
author = "Shaw, {B. W.}",
year = "1993",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "179--187",
journal = "Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal",
issn = "1054-6863",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict of interest in the procurement of organs from cadavers following withdrawal of life support.

AU - Shaw, B. W.

PY - 1993/6/1

Y1 - 1993/6/1

N2 - The University of Pittsburgh policy for procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadaver donors recognizes the potential for conflicts of interest between caring for a "hopelessly ill" patient who has forgone life-sustaining treatment and caring for a potential organ donor. The policy calls for a separation between those medical personnel who care for the gravely ill patient and those involved with the care of transplant recipients. While such a separation is possible in theory, it is difficult or impossible to attain in practice. However, such a separation of duties would be unnecessary if an arbitrator were appointed to monitor the proceedings as they take place on a case-by-case basis. In this way, the biases--real or potential--of the individuals involved could be identified, and the harmful effects of the unavoidable conflicts of interest could be minimized.

AB - The University of Pittsburgh policy for procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadaver donors recognizes the potential for conflicts of interest between caring for a "hopelessly ill" patient who has forgone life-sustaining treatment and caring for a potential organ donor. The policy calls for a separation between those medical personnel who care for the gravely ill patient and those involved with the care of transplant recipients. While such a separation is possible in theory, it is difficult or impossible to attain in practice. However, such a separation of duties would be unnecessary if an arbitrator were appointed to monitor the proceedings as they take place on a case-by-case basis. In this way, the biases--real or potential--of the individuals involved could be identified, and the harmful effects of the unavoidable conflicts of interest could be minimized.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027620896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027620896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10126530

AN - SCOPUS:0027620896

VL - 3

SP - 179

EP - 187

JO - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

JF - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

SN - 1054-6863

IS - 2

ER -