Conducting a drought-specific THIRA (Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment)

A powerful tool for integrating all-hazard mitigation and drought planning efforts to increase drought mitigation quality

Elliot D. Wickham, Deborah Bathke, Tarik L Abdel-Monem, Tonya Bernadt, Denise J Bulling, Lisa Marie Pytlik Zillig, Crystal Stiles, Nicole Wall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the United States, drought is the second costliest natural disaster, which leads to the need for increased drought mitigation efforts over time. However, drought planning has lagged behind other hazard mitigation efforts, which is likely due to the lack of a national drought planning policy. Although the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires all jurisdictions have a hazard mitigation plan (HMP) to receive pre-disaster mitigation funds, drought has only recently been a requirement in HMPs. In 2012, Nebraska witnessed its worse drought in recent history, which exposed the gaps in drought planning effectiveness at all jurisdictional levels. To address potential drought planning gaps, we developed, conducted, and evaluated a Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA), a FEMA risk assessment process, which solely focused on drought. This drought-specific THIRA consisted of a one-day workshop in which stakeholders and agency experts from the Platte River Basin in Nebraska worked collaboratively to determine the necessary resources for successfully managing a worst-case drought scenario in the region. We analyzed the findings of this workshop and compared them against the current drought planning activities in the Platte River Basin and found that the current drought planning activities would not be effective against a worst-case drought, in terms of reducing drought vulnerability and increasing preparedness and response efforts. Our use of a drought-specific THIRA and drought plan evaluation provides both a quality process to increase drought mitigation efforts and a process to strengthen the integration between stand-alone drought plans and hazard mitigation plans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101227
JournalInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Volume39
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

Drought
drought
Risk assessment
risk assessment
Hazards
mitigation
hazard
threat
Planning
planning
Catchments
Disasters
river basin
Rivers
river

Keywords

  • Drought
  • Hazard mitigation plan (HMP)
  • Mitigation
  • Planning
  • THIRA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Safety Research
  • Geology

Cite this

@article{7d00dc439b9f4cc08dbce4b4042ca7b1,
title = "Conducting a drought-specific THIRA (Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment): A powerful tool for integrating all-hazard mitigation and drought planning efforts to increase drought mitigation quality",
abstract = "In the United States, drought is the second costliest natural disaster, which leads to the need for increased drought mitigation efforts over time. However, drought planning has lagged behind other hazard mitigation efforts, which is likely due to the lack of a national drought planning policy. Although the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires all jurisdictions have a hazard mitigation plan (HMP) to receive pre-disaster mitigation funds, drought has only recently been a requirement in HMPs. In 2012, Nebraska witnessed its worse drought in recent history, which exposed the gaps in drought planning effectiveness at all jurisdictional levels. To address potential drought planning gaps, we developed, conducted, and evaluated a Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA), a FEMA risk assessment process, which solely focused on drought. This drought-specific THIRA consisted of a one-day workshop in which stakeholders and agency experts from the Platte River Basin in Nebraska worked collaboratively to determine the necessary resources for successfully managing a worst-case drought scenario in the region. We analyzed the findings of this workshop and compared them against the current drought planning activities in the Platte River Basin and found that the current drought planning activities would not be effective against a worst-case drought, in terms of reducing drought vulnerability and increasing preparedness and response efforts. Our use of a drought-specific THIRA and drought plan evaluation provides both a quality process to increase drought mitigation efforts and a process to strengthen the integration between stand-alone drought plans and hazard mitigation plans.",
keywords = "Drought, Hazard mitigation plan (HMP), Mitigation, Planning, THIRA",
author = "Wickham, {Elliot D.} and Deborah Bathke and Abdel-Monem, {Tarik L} and Tonya Bernadt and Bulling, {Denise J} and {Pytlik Zillig}, {Lisa Marie} and Crystal Stiles and Nicole Wall",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101227",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
journal = "International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction",
issn = "2212-4209",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conducting a drought-specific THIRA (Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment)

T2 - A powerful tool for integrating all-hazard mitigation and drought planning efforts to increase drought mitigation quality

AU - Wickham, Elliot D.

AU - Bathke, Deborah

AU - Abdel-Monem, Tarik L

AU - Bernadt, Tonya

AU - Bulling, Denise J

AU - Pytlik Zillig, Lisa Marie

AU - Stiles, Crystal

AU - Wall, Nicole

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - In the United States, drought is the second costliest natural disaster, which leads to the need for increased drought mitigation efforts over time. However, drought planning has lagged behind other hazard mitigation efforts, which is likely due to the lack of a national drought planning policy. Although the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires all jurisdictions have a hazard mitigation plan (HMP) to receive pre-disaster mitigation funds, drought has only recently been a requirement in HMPs. In 2012, Nebraska witnessed its worse drought in recent history, which exposed the gaps in drought planning effectiveness at all jurisdictional levels. To address potential drought planning gaps, we developed, conducted, and evaluated a Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA), a FEMA risk assessment process, which solely focused on drought. This drought-specific THIRA consisted of a one-day workshop in which stakeholders and agency experts from the Platte River Basin in Nebraska worked collaboratively to determine the necessary resources for successfully managing a worst-case drought scenario in the region. We analyzed the findings of this workshop and compared them against the current drought planning activities in the Platte River Basin and found that the current drought planning activities would not be effective against a worst-case drought, in terms of reducing drought vulnerability and increasing preparedness and response efforts. Our use of a drought-specific THIRA and drought plan evaluation provides both a quality process to increase drought mitigation efforts and a process to strengthen the integration between stand-alone drought plans and hazard mitigation plans.

AB - In the United States, drought is the second costliest natural disaster, which leads to the need for increased drought mitigation efforts over time. However, drought planning has lagged behind other hazard mitigation efforts, which is likely due to the lack of a national drought planning policy. Although the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires all jurisdictions have a hazard mitigation plan (HMP) to receive pre-disaster mitigation funds, drought has only recently been a requirement in HMPs. In 2012, Nebraska witnessed its worse drought in recent history, which exposed the gaps in drought planning effectiveness at all jurisdictional levels. To address potential drought planning gaps, we developed, conducted, and evaluated a Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA), a FEMA risk assessment process, which solely focused on drought. This drought-specific THIRA consisted of a one-day workshop in which stakeholders and agency experts from the Platte River Basin in Nebraska worked collaboratively to determine the necessary resources for successfully managing a worst-case drought scenario in the region. We analyzed the findings of this workshop and compared them against the current drought planning activities in the Platte River Basin and found that the current drought planning activities would not be effective against a worst-case drought, in terms of reducing drought vulnerability and increasing preparedness and response efforts. Our use of a drought-specific THIRA and drought plan evaluation provides both a quality process to increase drought mitigation efforts and a process to strengthen the integration between stand-alone drought plans and hazard mitigation plans.

KW - Drought

KW - Hazard mitigation plan (HMP)

KW - Mitigation

KW - Planning

KW - THIRA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068932590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068932590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101227

DO - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101227

M3 - Article

VL - 39

JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

SN - 2212-4209

M1 - 101227

ER -