Conditioned stimulus determinants of conditioned response form in pavlovian fear conditioning

Stephen D. Kim, Steven Rivers, Rick A. Bevins, John J.B. Ayres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four experiments using barpress conditioned suppression in rats found that tone evoked more freezing (immobility) than did light. Still, tone and light appeared to have similar conditioned value as assessed by suppression in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, and by blocking, second-order conditioning, and overconditioning assays in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Experiment 4 arranged for tone to evoke less suppression than light but more freezing. Results suggest that in fear conditioning, the nature of the conditioned stimulus affects the form of conditioned responding (strong vs. weak freezing). This conclusion extends one drawn by P. C. Holland (1977) on the basis of his work in appetitive conditioning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-104
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

conditioned behavior
fearfulness
conditioning
Freezing
Fear
freezing
Light
experiment
rats
assay
assays
Conditioning (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Conditioned stimulus determinants of conditioned response form in pavlovian fear conditioning. / Kim, Stephen D.; Rivers, Steven; Bevins, Rick A.; Ayres, John J.B.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 87-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{897f0c62b0024c83b32c97f2b342aeda,
title = "Conditioned stimulus determinants of conditioned response form in pavlovian fear conditioning",
abstract = "Four experiments using barpress conditioned suppression in rats found that tone evoked more freezing (immobility) than did light. Still, tone and light appeared to have similar conditioned value as assessed by suppression in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, and by blocking, second-order conditioning, and overconditioning assays in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Experiment 4 arranged for tone to evoke less suppression than light but more freezing. Results suggest that in fear conditioning, the nature of the conditioned stimulus affects the form of conditioned responding (strong vs. weak freezing). This conclusion extends one drawn by P. C. Holland (1977) on the basis of his work in appetitive conditioning.",
author = "Kim, {Stephen D.} and Steven Rivers and Bevins, {Rick A.} and Ayres, {John J.B.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0097-7403.22.1.87",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "87--104",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes",
issn = "0097-7403",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conditioned stimulus determinants of conditioned response form in pavlovian fear conditioning

AU - Kim, Stephen D.

AU - Rivers, Steven

AU - Bevins, Rick A.

AU - Ayres, John J.B.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Four experiments using barpress conditioned suppression in rats found that tone evoked more freezing (immobility) than did light. Still, tone and light appeared to have similar conditioned value as assessed by suppression in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, and by blocking, second-order conditioning, and overconditioning assays in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Experiment 4 arranged for tone to evoke less suppression than light but more freezing. Results suggest that in fear conditioning, the nature of the conditioned stimulus affects the form of conditioned responding (strong vs. weak freezing). This conclusion extends one drawn by P. C. Holland (1977) on the basis of his work in appetitive conditioning.

AB - Four experiments using barpress conditioned suppression in rats found that tone evoked more freezing (immobility) than did light. Still, tone and light appeared to have similar conditioned value as assessed by suppression in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, and by blocking, second-order conditioning, and overconditioning assays in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Experiment 4 arranged for tone to evoke less suppression than light but more freezing. Results suggest that in fear conditioning, the nature of the conditioned stimulus affects the form of conditioned responding (strong vs. weak freezing). This conclusion extends one drawn by P. C. Holland (1977) on the basis of his work in appetitive conditioning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029684902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029684902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0097-7403.22.1.87

DO - 10.1037/0097-7403.22.1.87

M3 - Article

C2 - 8568499

AN - SCOPUS:0029684902

VL - 22

SP - 87

EP - 104

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

SN - 0097-7403

IS - 1

ER -