Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs: A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research

Vicki L. Plano Clark, Nancy Anderson, Jessica A. Wertz, Yuchun Zhou, Karen Schumacher, Christine Miaskowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Longitudinal research is well suited for investigating phenomena that change over time. With the growing acceptance of mixed methods, researchers are combining qualitative and quantitative approaches within longitudinal research. However, little attention has been paid to how researchers integrate longitudinal mixed methods databases. The purpose of this methodological review was to describe how researchers combine mixed methods and longitudinal approaches in practice and delineate dimensions and issues inherent within these complex designs. We examined published empirical studies from the health sciences that self-identified as longitudinal and mixed methods. Our results identify major dimensions, variations, and issues for designing longitudinal mixed methods research and suggest recommendations for researchers interested in using this complex approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-319
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Mixed Methods Research
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 22 2015

Fingerprint

Mixed Methods
health science
Health
Empirical Study
acceptance
Design
Review
Mixed methods
Recommendations
Integrate
Longitudinal research

Keywords

  • health sciences
  • longitudinal research
  • mixed methods designs
  • procedural issues
  • repeated measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this

Plano Clark, V. L., Anderson, N., Wertz, J. A., Zhou, Y., Schumacher, K., & Miaskowski, C. (2015). Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs: A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(4), 297-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814543563

Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs : A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research. / Plano Clark, Vicki L.; Anderson, Nancy; Wertz, Jessica A.; Zhou, Yuchun; Schumacher, Karen; Miaskowski, Christine.

In: Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, 22.10.2015, p. 297-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Plano Clark, VL, Anderson, N, Wertz, JA, Zhou, Y, Schumacher, K & Miaskowski, C 2015, 'Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs: A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research', Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 297-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814543563
Plano Clark, Vicki L. ; Anderson, Nancy ; Wertz, Jessica A. ; Zhou, Yuchun ; Schumacher, Karen ; Miaskowski, Christine. / Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs : A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research. In: Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2015 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 297-319.
@article{0a5b5dc9f5b64eb1a97357f08b129769,
title = "Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs: A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research",
abstract = "Longitudinal research is well suited for investigating phenomena that change over time. With the growing acceptance of mixed methods, researchers are combining qualitative and quantitative approaches within longitudinal research. However, little attention has been paid to how researchers integrate longitudinal mixed methods databases. The purpose of this methodological review was to describe how researchers combine mixed methods and longitudinal approaches in practice and delineate dimensions and issues inherent within these complex designs. We examined published empirical studies from the health sciences that self-identified as longitudinal and mixed methods. Our results identify major dimensions, variations, and issues for designing longitudinal mixed methods research and suggest recommendations for researchers interested in using this complex approach.",
keywords = "health sciences, longitudinal research, mixed methods designs, procedural issues, repeated measures",
author = "{Plano Clark}, {Vicki L.} and Nancy Anderson and Wertz, {Jessica A.} and Yuchun Zhou and Karen Schumacher and Christine Miaskowski",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1177/1558689814543563",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "297--319",
journal = "Journal of Mixed Methods Research",
issn = "1558-6898",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs

T2 - A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research

AU - Plano Clark, Vicki L.

AU - Anderson, Nancy

AU - Wertz, Jessica A.

AU - Zhou, Yuchun

AU - Schumacher, Karen

AU - Miaskowski, Christine

PY - 2015/10/22

Y1 - 2015/10/22

N2 - Longitudinal research is well suited for investigating phenomena that change over time. With the growing acceptance of mixed methods, researchers are combining qualitative and quantitative approaches within longitudinal research. However, little attention has been paid to how researchers integrate longitudinal mixed methods databases. The purpose of this methodological review was to describe how researchers combine mixed methods and longitudinal approaches in practice and delineate dimensions and issues inherent within these complex designs. We examined published empirical studies from the health sciences that self-identified as longitudinal and mixed methods. Our results identify major dimensions, variations, and issues for designing longitudinal mixed methods research and suggest recommendations for researchers interested in using this complex approach.

AB - Longitudinal research is well suited for investigating phenomena that change over time. With the growing acceptance of mixed methods, researchers are combining qualitative and quantitative approaches within longitudinal research. However, little attention has been paid to how researchers integrate longitudinal mixed methods databases. The purpose of this methodological review was to describe how researchers combine mixed methods and longitudinal approaches in practice and delineate dimensions and issues inherent within these complex designs. We examined published empirical studies from the health sciences that self-identified as longitudinal and mixed methods. Our results identify major dimensions, variations, and issues for designing longitudinal mixed methods research and suggest recommendations for researchers interested in using this complex approach.

KW - health sciences

KW - longitudinal research

KW - mixed methods designs

KW - procedural issues

KW - repeated measures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942081932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942081932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1558689814543563

DO - 10.1177/1558689814543563

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942081932

VL - 9

SP - 297

EP - 319

JO - Journal of Mixed Methods Research

JF - Journal of Mixed Methods Research

SN - 1558-6898

IS - 4

ER -