Conceptual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics

Ginamarie M. Scott, Devin C. Lonergan, Michael D. Mumford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

122 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research points to the importance of conceptual combination in creative thought. One way people might generate new combinations is through feature search and mapping - an analogical approach. Another way people might generate new combinations is through the integration and elaboration of event models - a case-based approach. To contrast these two approaches, 190 undergraduates were asked to review material describing multiple educational programs and devise a new high school curriculum using heuristics applying to 1 of these 2 approaches. The programs presented were varied with respect to the number of prior programs presented, their similarity, and divergence from current educational practices. It was found that effective use of appropriate heuristics was related to the quality, originality, and elegance of obtained solutions. Use of heuristics associated with an analogical approach led to better performance when a larger number of prior programs was presented. Use of heuristics associated with a case-based approach led to better performance when a smaller number of prior programs was presented. Implications for the use of these 2 alternative approaches in creative thought are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-98
Number of pages20
JournalCreativity Research Journal
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2 2005

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Knowledge Structure
Conceptual Combination
Heuristics
Research
Education
Thought
Originality
High School
School Curriculum
Divergence
Elegance
Elaboration
Undergraduate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Conceptual combination : Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. / Scott, Ginamarie M.; Lonergan, Devin C.; Mumford, Michael D.

In: Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, 02.05.2005, p. 79-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, Ginamarie M. ; Lonergan, Devin C. ; Mumford, Michael D. / Conceptual combination : Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. In: Creativity Research Journal. 2005 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 79-98.
@article{4e363a77c8c14dbb860e64727c4f2aad,
title = "Conceptual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics",
abstract = "Prior research points to the importance of conceptual combination in creative thought. One way people might generate new combinations is through feature search and mapping - an analogical approach. Another way people might generate new combinations is through the integration and elaboration of event models - a case-based approach. To contrast these two approaches, 190 undergraduates were asked to review material describing multiple educational programs and devise a new high school curriculum using heuristics applying to 1 of these 2 approaches. The programs presented were varied with respect to the number of prior programs presented, their similarity, and divergence from current educational practices. It was found that effective use of appropriate heuristics was related to the quality, originality, and elegance of obtained solutions. Use of heuristics associated with an analogical approach led to better performance when a larger number of prior programs was presented. Use of heuristics associated with a case-based approach led to better performance when a smaller number of prior programs was presented. Implications for the use of these 2 alternative approaches in creative thought are discussed.",
author = "Scott, {Ginamarie M.} and Lonergan, {Devin C.} and Mumford, {Michael D.}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1207/s15326934crj1701_7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "79--98",
journal = "Creativity Research Journal",
issn = "1040-0419",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptual combination

T2 - Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics

AU - Scott, Ginamarie M.

AU - Lonergan, Devin C.

AU - Mumford, Michael D.

PY - 2005/5/2

Y1 - 2005/5/2

N2 - Prior research points to the importance of conceptual combination in creative thought. One way people might generate new combinations is through feature search and mapping - an analogical approach. Another way people might generate new combinations is through the integration and elaboration of event models - a case-based approach. To contrast these two approaches, 190 undergraduates were asked to review material describing multiple educational programs and devise a new high school curriculum using heuristics applying to 1 of these 2 approaches. The programs presented were varied with respect to the number of prior programs presented, their similarity, and divergence from current educational practices. It was found that effective use of appropriate heuristics was related to the quality, originality, and elegance of obtained solutions. Use of heuristics associated with an analogical approach led to better performance when a larger number of prior programs was presented. Use of heuristics associated with a case-based approach led to better performance when a smaller number of prior programs was presented. Implications for the use of these 2 alternative approaches in creative thought are discussed.

AB - Prior research points to the importance of conceptual combination in creative thought. One way people might generate new combinations is through feature search and mapping - an analogical approach. Another way people might generate new combinations is through the integration and elaboration of event models - a case-based approach. To contrast these two approaches, 190 undergraduates were asked to review material describing multiple educational programs and devise a new high school curriculum using heuristics applying to 1 of these 2 approaches. The programs presented were varied with respect to the number of prior programs presented, their similarity, and divergence from current educational practices. It was found that effective use of appropriate heuristics was related to the quality, originality, and elegance of obtained solutions. Use of heuristics associated with an analogical approach led to better performance when a larger number of prior programs was presented. Use of heuristics associated with a case-based approach led to better performance when a smaller number of prior programs was presented. Implications for the use of these 2 alternative approaches in creative thought are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444362243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17444362243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15326934crj1701_7

DO - 10.1207/s15326934crj1701_7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:17444362243

VL - 17

SP - 79

EP - 98

JO - Creativity Research Journal

JF - Creativity Research Journal

SN - 1040-0419

IS - 1

ER -