Compressed natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas as alternative fuels

Massoum Moussavi, Motasem Al-Turk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of alternative fuels in the transportation industry has gained a strong support in recent years. In this paper an attempt was made to evaluate the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and compressed natural gas (NG) by 25 LPG-bifuel and 14 NG-bifuel vehicles that are operated by 33 transit systems throughout Nebraska. A set of performance measures such as average fuel efficiency in kilometers per liter, average fuel cost per kilometer, average oil consumption, and average operation and maintenance cost for alternatively fueled vehicles were calculated and compared with similar performance measures of gasoline powered vehicles. The results of the study showed that the average fuel efficiency of gasoline is greater than those of LPG and NG, and the average fuel costs (dollars per kilometer) for LPG and NG are smaller than those for gasoline for most of the vehicles under this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-179
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Energy Engineering
Volume119
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1993

Fingerprint

liquefied petroleum gas
Compressed natural gas
alternative fuel
Alternative fuels
Liquefied petroleum gas
natural gas
Gasoline
Natural gas
Natural gas vehicles
cost
Costs
vehicle
oil
industry
Industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Compressed natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas as alternative fuels. / Moussavi, Massoum; Al-Turk, Motasem.

In: Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 3, 12.1993, p. 168-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{086fba6aed534f06953f7a587e0990eb,
title = "Compressed natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas as alternative fuels",
abstract = "The use of alternative fuels in the transportation industry has gained a strong support in recent years. In this paper an attempt was made to evaluate the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and compressed natural gas (NG) by 25 LPG-bifuel and 14 NG-bifuel vehicles that are operated by 33 transit systems throughout Nebraska. A set of performance measures such as average fuel efficiency in kilometers per liter, average fuel cost per kilometer, average oil consumption, and average operation and maintenance cost for alternatively fueled vehicles were calculated and compared with similar performance measures of gasoline powered vehicles. The results of the study showed that the average fuel efficiency of gasoline is greater than those of LPG and NG, and the average fuel costs (dollars per kilometer) for LPG and NG are smaller than those for gasoline for most of the vehicles under this study.",
author = "Massoum Moussavi and Motasem Al-Turk",
year = "1993",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1993)119:3(168)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "168--179",
journal = "Journal of Energy Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9402",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compressed natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas as alternative fuels

AU - Moussavi, Massoum

AU - Al-Turk, Motasem

PY - 1993/12

Y1 - 1993/12

N2 - The use of alternative fuels in the transportation industry has gained a strong support in recent years. In this paper an attempt was made to evaluate the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and compressed natural gas (NG) by 25 LPG-bifuel and 14 NG-bifuel vehicles that are operated by 33 transit systems throughout Nebraska. A set of performance measures such as average fuel efficiency in kilometers per liter, average fuel cost per kilometer, average oil consumption, and average operation and maintenance cost for alternatively fueled vehicles were calculated and compared with similar performance measures of gasoline powered vehicles. The results of the study showed that the average fuel efficiency of gasoline is greater than those of LPG and NG, and the average fuel costs (dollars per kilometer) for LPG and NG are smaller than those for gasoline for most of the vehicles under this study.

AB - The use of alternative fuels in the transportation industry has gained a strong support in recent years. In this paper an attempt was made to evaluate the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and compressed natural gas (NG) by 25 LPG-bifuel and 14 NG-bifuel vehicles that are operated by 33 transit systems throughout Nebraska. A set of performance measures such as average fuel efficiency in kilometers per liter, average fuel cost per kilometer, average oil consumption, and average operation and maintenance cost for alternatively fueled vehicles were calculated and compared with similar performance measures of gasoline powered vehicles. The results of the study showed that the average fuel efficiency of gasoline is greater than those of LPG and NG, and the average fuel costs (dollars per kilometer) for LPG and NG are smaller than those for gasoline for most of the vehicles under this study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027802025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027802025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1993)119:3(168)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1993)119:3(168)

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0027802025

VL - 119

SP - 168

EP - 179

JO - Journal of Energy Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Energy Engineering - ASCE

SN - 0733-9402

IS - 3

ER -