Comprehension of single versus combined modality information by people with aphasia

Jessica A. Brown, Sarah E. Wallace, Kelly Knollman-Porter, Karen A Hux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Every adult with aphasia displays a unique constellation of language comprehension skills and varies in the benefit derived from different content presentation formats. For many, multiple modality presentation enhances comprehension. This study’s purpose was to determine the comprehension benefits for people with mild, moderate, and severe aphasia when hearing, reading, or simultaneously hearing and reading single sentences. Method: Twenty-seven adults with aphasia performed a repeated-measures experiment across 3 conditions. Participants read and/or listened to sentence stimuli and selected from 4 images the 1 matching the sentence. Participants also indicated condition preference. Results: Participants demonstrated significantly greatest accuracy during simultaneous written and auditory stimulus presentation. Performance patterns varied within aphasia severity groups. Individuals with mild and moderate aphasia demonstrated minimal performance differences across conditions, and people with severe aphasia were significantly more accurate in the combined modality than the written-only modality. Overall, participants required the longest response time in the written-only condition; however, participants were most efficient with auditory content. Condition preferences did not always mirror accuracy; however, the majority reported a preference for combined content presentation. Conclusions: Results suggest some people with aphasia may benefit from combined auditory and written modalities to enhance comprehension efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)278-292
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume28
Issue number1S
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Aphasia
speech disorder
comprehension
Hearing
Reading
stimulus
Reaction Time
performance
Language
experiment
language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Comprehension of single versus combined modality information by people with aphasia. / Brown, Jessica A.; Wallace, Sarah E.; Knollman-Porter, Kelly; Hux, Karen A.

In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 28, No. 1S, 01.03.2019, p. 278-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, Jessica A. ; Wallace, Sarah E. ; Knollman-Porter, Kelly ; Hux, Karen A. / Comprehension of single versus combined modality information by people with aphasia. In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 1S. pp. 278-292.
@article{78df445b05bd44c388e3c5846a146538,
title = "Comprehension of single versus combined modality information by people with aphasia",
abstract = "Purpose: Every adult with aphasia displays a unique constellation of language comprehension skills and varies in the benefit derived from different content presentation formats. For many, multiple modality presentation enhances comprehension. This study’s purpose was to determine the comprehension benefits for people with mild, moderate, and severe aphasia when hearing, reading, or simultaneously hearing and reading single sentences. Method: Twenty-seven adults with aphasia performed a repeated-measures experiment across 3 conditions. Participants read and/or listened to sentence stimuli and selected from 4 images the 1 matching the sentence. Participants also indicated condition preference. Results: Participants demonstrated significantly greatest accuracy during simultaneous written and auditory stimulus presentation. Performance patterns varied within aphasia severity groups. Individuals with mild and moderate aphasia demonstrated minimal performance differences across conditions, and people with severe aphasia were significantly more accurate in the combined modality than the written-only modality. Overall, participants required the longest response time in the written-only condition; however, participants were most efficient with auditory content. Condition preferences did not always mirror accuracy; however, the majority reported a preference for combined content presentation. Conclusions: Results suggest some people with aphasia may benefit from combined auditory and written modalities to enhance comprehension efforts.",
author = "Brown, {Jessica A.} and Wallace, {Sarah E.} and Kelly Knollman-Porter and Hux, {Karen A}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0132",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "278--292",
journal = "American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology",
issn = "1058-0360",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "1S",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comprehension of single versus combined modality information by people with aphasia

AU - Brown, Jessica A.

AU - Wallace, Sarah E.

AU - Knollman-Porter, Kelly

AU - Hux, Karen A

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Purpose: Every adult with aphasia displays a unique constellation of language comprehension skills and varies in the benefit derived from different content presentation formats. For many, multiple modality presentation enhances comprehension. This study’s purpose was to determine the comprehension benefits for people with mild, moderate, and severe aphasia when hearing, reading, or simultaneously hearing and reading single sentences. Method: Twenty-seven adults with aphasia performed a repeated-measures experiment across 3 conditions. Participants read and/or listened to sentence stimuli and selected from 4 images the 1 matching the sentence. Participants also indicated condition preference. Results: Participants demonstrated significantly greatest accuracy during simultaneous written and auditory stimulus presentation. Performance patterns varied within aphasia severity groups. Individuals with mild and moderate aphasia demonstrated minimal performance differences across conditions, and people with severe aphasia were significantly more accurate in the combined modality than the written-only modality. Overall, participants required the longest response time in the written-only condition; however, participants were most efficient with auditory content. Condition preferences did not always mirror accuracy; however, the majority reported a preference for combined content presentation. Conclusions: Results suggest some people with aphasia may benefit from combined auditory and written modalities to enhance comprehension efforts.

AB - Purpose: Every adult with aphasia displays a unique constellation of language comprehension skills and varies in the benefit derived from different content presentation formats. For many, multiple modality presentation enhances comprehension. This study’s purpose was to determine the comprehension benefits for people with mild, moderate, and severe aphasia when hearing, reading, or simultaneously hearing and reading single sentences. Method: Twenty-seven adults with aphasia performed a repeated-measures experiment across 3 conditions. Participants read and/or listened to sentence stimuli and selected from 4 images the 1 matching the sentence. Participants also indicated condition preference. Results: Participants demonstrated significantly greatest accuracy during simultaneous written and auditory stimulus presentation. Performance patterns varied within aphasia severity groups. Individuals with mild and moderate aphasia demonstrated minimal performance differences across conditions, and people with severe aphasia were significantly more accurate in the combined modality than the written-only modality. Overall, participants required the longest response time in the written-only condition; however, participants were most efficient with auditory content. Condition preferences did not always mirror accuracy; however, the majority reported a preference for combined content presentation. Conclusions: Results suggest some people with aphasia may benefit from combined auditory and written modalities to enhance comprehension efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052136170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052136170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0132

DO - 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0132

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 278

EP - 292

JO - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

JF - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

SN - 1058-0360

IS - 1S

ER -