Comparisons of voluntary and evoked rate of torque development and rate of velocity development during isokinetic muscle actions

Nathaniel D.M. Jenkins, Ty B. Palmer, Joel T Cramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The rate of torque development (RTD) and the rate of velocity development (RVD) have previously been described as related; however, a direct comparison has not been performed. Objective: The purposes of this study were to compare voluntary and evoked RVD and RTD during the same maximal isokinetic leg extensions muscle actions and to indirectly explore the influence of motor unit discharge frequency on these variables. Methods: Sixteen men completed three maximal voluntary and three maximal evoked isokinetic leg extension muscle actions at 60°·s-1. Peak RVD, general RVD, peak RTD, and electromechanical delay (EMD) were calculated from the voluntary and evoked muscle actions. Voluntary and evoked RTD and RVD were also calculated for each 10 ms epoch up to 200 ms of the muscle actions. Results: There was no interaction between voluntary and evoked RVD across time (p=0.12), but there was an interaction for RTD (p<0.01). However, peak RTD occurred prior to the isokinetic load range. Peak RTD (p<0.001), peak RVD (p< 0.01), general RVD (p< 0.01), isokinetic load range (p<0.001), EMD (p<0.001), and PT (p<0.001) were greater for voluntary than evoked muscle actions, which was expected due to the influence of voluntary motor unit firing rates. Conclusions: Overall, these results suggested that the calculation of RTD during the acceleration phase of an isokinetic muscle action may not be valid due to the unknown load and increasing velocity. Furthermore, the RVD may be influenced by motor unit firing rate, but to a lesser extent than RTD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-261
Number of pages9
JournalIsokinetics and Exercise Science
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 16 2013

Fingerprint

Torque
Muscles
Leg
Skeletal Muscle

Keywords

  • Acceleration range of motion
  • Electrical stimulation
  • Explosive neuromuscular characteristics
  • Involuntary
  • Rapid force production

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Comparisons of voluntary and evoked rate of torque development and rate of velocity development during isokinetic muscle actions. / Jenkins, Nathaniel D.M.; Palmer, Ty B.; Cramer, Joel T.

In: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, Vol. 21, No. 3, 16.09.2013, p. 253-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4375fbb2160344f697ab9f36df47b524,
title = "Comparisons of voluntary and evoked rate of torque development and rate of velocity development during isokinetic muscle actions",
abstract = "Background: The rate of torque development (RTD) and the rate of velocity development (RVD) have previously been described as related; however, a direct comparison has not been performed. Objective: The purposes of this study were to compare voluntary and evoked RVD and RTD during the same maximal isokinetic leg extensions muscle actions and to indirectly explore the influence of motor unit discharge frequency on these variables. Methods: Sixteen men completed three maximal voluntary and three maximal evoked isokinetic leg extension muscle actions at 60°·s-1. Peak RVD, general RVD, peak RTD, and electromechanical delay (EMD) were calculated from the voluntary and evoked muscle actions. Voluntary and evoked RTD and RVD were also calculated for each 10 ms epoch up to 200 ms of the muscle actions. Results: There was no interaction between voluntary and evoked RVD across time (p=0.12), but there was an interaction for RTD (p<0.01). However, peak RTD occurred prior to the isokinetic load range. Peak RTD (p<0.001), peak RVD (p< 0.01), general RVD (p< 0.01), isokinetic load range (p<0.001), EMD (p<0.001), and PT (p<0.001) were greater for voluntary than evoked muscle actions, which was expected due to the influence of voluntary motor unit firing rates. Conclusions: Overall, these results suggested that the calculation of RTD during the acceleration phase of an isokinetic muscle action may not be valid due to the unknown load and increasing velocity. Furthermore, the RVD may be influenced by motor unit firing rate, but to a lesser extent than RTD.",
keywords = "Acceleration range of motion, Electrical stimulation, Explosive neuromuscular characteristics, Involuntary, Rapid force production",
author = "Jenkins, {Nathaniel D.M.} and Palmer, {Ty B.} and Cramer, {Joel T}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.3233/IES-130504",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "253--261",
journal = "Isokinetics and Exercise Science",
issn = "0959-3020",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of voluntary and evoked rate of torque development and rate of velocity development during isokinetic muscle actions

AU - Jenkins, Nathaniel D.M.

AU - Palmer, Ty B.

AU - Cramer, Joel T

PY - 2013/9/16

Y1 - 2013/9/16

N2 - Background: The rate of torque development (RTD) and the rate of velocity development (RVD) have previously been described as related; however, a direct comparison has not been performed. Objective: The purposes of this study were to compare voluntary and evoked RVD and RTD during the same maximal isokinetic leg extensions muscle actions and to indirectly explore the influence of motor unit discharge frequency on these variables. Methods: Sixteen men completed three maximal voluntary and three maximal evoked isokinetic leg extension muscle actions at 60°·s-1. Peak RVD, general RVD, peak RTD, and electromechanical delay (EMD) were calculated from the voluntary and evoked muscle actions. Voluntary and evoked RTD and RVD were also calculated for each 10 ms epoch up to 200 ms of the muscle actions. Results: There was no interaction between voluntary and evoked RVD across time (p=0.12), but there was an interaction for RTD (p<0.01). However, peak RTD occurred prior to the isokinetic load range. Peak RTD (p<0.001), peak RVD (p< 0.01), general RVD (p< 0.01), isokinetic load range (p<0.001), EMD (p<0.001), and PT (p<0.001) were greater for voluntary than evoked muscle actions, which was expected due to the influence of voluntary motor unit firing rates. Conclusions: Overall, these results suggested that the calculation of RTD during the acceleration phase of an isokinetic muscle action may not be valid due to the unknown load and increasing velocity. Furthermore, the RVD may be influenced by motor unit firing rate, but to a lesser extent than RTD.

AB - Background: The rate of torque development (RTD) and the rate of velocity development (RVD) have previously been described as related; however, a direct comparison has not been performed. Objective: The purposes of this study were to compare voluntary and evoked RVD and RTD during the same maximal isokinetic leg extensions muscle actions and to indirectly explore the influence of motor unit discharge frequency on these variables. Methods: Sixteen men completed three maximal voluntary and three maximal evoked isokinetic leg extension muscle actions at 60°·s-1. Peak RVD, general RVD, peak RTD, and electromechanical delay (EMD) were calculated from the voluntary and evoked muscle actions. Voluntary and evoked RTD and RVD were also calculated for each 10 ms epoch up to 200 ms of the muscle actions. Results: There was no interaction between voluntary and evoked RVD across time (p=0.12), but there was an interaction for RTD (p<0.01). However, peak RTD occurred prior to the isokinetic load range. Peak RTD (p<0.001), peak RVD (p< 0.01), general RVD (p< 0.01), isokinetic load range (p<0.001), EMD (p<0.001), and PT (p<0.001) were greater for voluntary than evoked muscle actions, which was expected due to the influence of voluntary motor unit firing rates. Conclusions: Overall, these results suggested that the calculation of RTD during the acceleration phase of an isokinetic muscle action may not be valid due to the unknown load and increasing velocity. Furthermore, the RVD may be influenced by motor unit firing rate, but to a lesser extent than RTD.

KW - Acceleration range of motion

KW - Electrical stimulation

KW - Explosive neuromuscular characteristics

KW - Involuntary

KW - Rapid force production

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883712540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883712540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/IES-130504

DO - 10.3233/IES-130504

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 253

EP - 261

JO - Isokinetics and Exercise Science

JF - Isokinetics and Exercise Science

SN - 0959-3020

IS - 3

ER -