Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women

M. A. Olsen, A. R. Sambol, V. A. Bohnert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen, Syva Microtrak, was compared with Abbott Chlamydiazyme to evaluate the performance of the Microtrak assay in the diagnosis of chlamydial genital tract infection in women. Duplicate endocervical swabs from 550 women were tested by both methods, and discrepancies were resolved by direct immunofluorescence on pelleted material from the collection tubes. Forty-six specimens were positive by the Syva Microtrak assay (resolved sensitivity, 95%), and 34 specimens were positive by the Chlamydiazyme assay (resolved sensitivity, 79%). The results from this small study suggest that the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme for the detection of chlamydial antigen in endocervical specimens. This test should be useful for the diagnosis of chlamydial genital tract infection in females.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-156
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Volume119
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Reproductive Tract Infections
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Antigens
Direct Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Chlamydia trachomatis
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women. / Olsen, M. A.; Sambol, A. R.; Bohnert, V. A.

In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 119, No. 2, 01.01.1995, p. 153-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3f17afbc6c574fb18ae5ef6c76a907ab,
title = "Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women",
abstract = "An enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen, Syva Microtrak, was compared with Abbott Chlamydiazyme to evaluate the performance of the Microtrak assay in the diagnosis of chlamydial genital tract infection in women. Duplicate endocervical swabs from 550 women were tested by both methods, and discrepancies were resolved by direct immunofluorescence on pelleted material from the collection tubes. Forty-six specimens were positive by the Syva Microtrak assay (resolved sensitivity, 95{\%}), and 34 specimens were positive by the Chlamydiazyme assay (resolved sensitivity, 79{\%}). The results from this small study suggest that the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme for the detection of chlamydial antigen in endocervical specimens. This test should be useful for the diagnosis of chlamydial genital tract infection in females.",
author = "Olsen, {M. A.} and Sambol, {A. R.} and Bohnert, {V. A.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "153--156",
journal = "Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0003-9985",
publisher = "College of American Pathologists",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women

AU - Olsen, M. A.

AU - Sambol, A. R.

AU - Bohnert, V. A.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - An enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen, Syva Microtrak, was compared with Abbott Chlamydiazyme to evaluate the performance of the Microtrak assay in the diagnosis of chlamydial genital tract infection in women. Duplicate endocervical swabs from 550 women were tested by both methods, and discrepancies were resolved by direct immunofluorescence on pelleted material from the collection tubes. Forty-six specimens were positive by the Syva Microtrak assay (resolved sensitivity, 95%), and 34 specimens were positive by the Chlamydiazyme assay (resolved sensitivity, 79%). The results from this small study suggest that the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme for the detection of chlamydial antigen in endocervical specimens. This test should be useful for the diagnosis of chlamydial genital tract infection in females.

AB - An enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen, Syva Microtrak, was compared with Abbott Chlamydiazyme to evaluate the performance of the Microtrak assay in the diagnosis of chlamydial genital tract infection in women. Duplicate endocervical swabs from 550 women were tested by both methods, and discrepancies were resolved by direct immunofluorescence on pelleted material from the collection tubes. Forty-six specimens were positive by the Syva Microtrak assay (resolved sensitivity, 95%), and 34 specimens were positive by the Chlamydiazyme assay (resolved sensitivity, 79%). The results from this small study suggest that the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme for the detection of chlamydial antigen in endocervical specimens. This test should be useful for the diagnosis of chlamydial genital tract infection in females.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028837029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028837029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7848062

AN - SCOPUS:0028837029

VL - 119

SP - 153

EP - 156

JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0003-9985

IS - 2

ER -